House Dems' campaign arm raises $31M in first quarter
Source: The Hill
BY LISA HAGEN - 04/14/17 07:57 AM EDT
The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) raised $13.2 million in March, closing out the first fundraising quarter with a record $31 million in donations.
The DCCCs fundraising haul, provided first to The Hill, trails the National Republican Congressional Committees (NRCC) March and first-quarter hauls. The NRCC raised $15.5 million in March and ended the first three months of the year with nearly $36 million in contributions.
But the DCCC touted its online fundraising, which vastly outpaced its GOP counterpart. House Democrats raised a record $13.6 million online in the first quarter, compared to the NRCC's $1.7 million online during that same time, according to Link to tweet
" target="_blank">National Journal.
The DCCC says it received 750,000 contributions online and had 121,000 first-time donors. The campaign committee ended March with more than $16 million cash on hand. Our record-breaking fundraising is a clear reflection of the urgency that people have towards fighting back against a reckless Republican agenda, including ongoing efforts to rip apart the Affordable Care Act, said DCCC spokesman Tyler Law.
Read more: http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/328794-house-dems-campaign-arm-raises-31m-in-first-quarter
Me.
(35,454 posts)for his campaign in Kansas?
BannonsLiver
(16,387 posts)Forgive me, but I'm skeptical.
Me.
(35,454 posts)But how about trying before lying down for a loss. In their realm $20K is a pittance.
BannonsLiver
(16,387 posts)Me.
(35,454 posts)jackssonjack
(79 posts)I don't understand are these totals. What am I missing? These are listed as Independent Expenditures, Communication Costs and Coordinated Expenses as of April 03, 2017.
Grand Total: $80,321,076
Total For Democrats: $664,818
Total Against Democrats: $0
Total For Republicans: $0
Total Against Republicans: $1,873,347
But there are several Republicans who are recipients of DCCC funds.
Me.
(35,454 posts)I was wrong. Which is good to be able to say about this.
I'm blind as a bat so I expand the pages a lot and thought the amounts under the "total" column were under the "for" column for whatever reason. Old eyes coupled with a brain cramp, I guess.
So good to read and appreciate you coming back to say so.
Hekate
(90,699 posts)Hekate
(90,699 posts)BannonsLiver
(16,387 posts)I choose to meet good news with a smile, not by pissing all over it.