House Dems' campaign arm raises $31M in first quarter
Source: The Hill
BY LISA HAGEN - 04/14/17 07:57 AM EDT
The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) raised $13.2 million in March, closing out the first fundraising quarter with a record $31 million in donations.
The DCCCs fundraising haul, provided first to The Hill, trails the National Republican Congressional Committees (NRCC) March and first-quarter hauls. The NRCC raised $15.5 million in March and ended the first three months of the year with nearly $36 million in contributions.
But the DCCC touted its online fundraising, which vastly outpaced its GOP counterpart. House Democrats raised a record $13.6 million online in the first quarter, compared to the NRCC's $1.7 million online during that same time, according to Link to tweet
" target="_blank">National Journal.
The DCCC says it received 750,000 contributions online and had 121,000 first-time donors. The campaign committee ended March with more than $16 million cash on hand. Our record-breaking fundraising is a clear reflection of the urgency that people have towards fighting back against a reckless Republican agenda, including ongoing efforts to rip apart the Affordable Care Act, said DCCC spokesman Tyler Law.
Read more: http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/328794-house-dems-campaign-arm-raises-31m-in-first-quarter
Me.
(35,454 posts)for his campaign in Kansas?
BannonsLiver
(20,316 posts)Forgive me, but I'm skeptical.
Me.
(35,454 posts)But how about trying before lying down for a loss. In their realm $20K is a pittance.
BannonsLiver
(20,316 posts)Me.
(35,454 posts)jackssonjack
(79 posts)I don't understand are these totals. What am I missing? These are listed as Independent Expenditures, Communication Costs and Coordinated Expenses as of April 03, 2017.
Grand Total: $80,321,076
Total For Democrats: $664,818
Total Against Democrats: $0
Total For Republicans: $0
Total Against Republicans: $1,873,347
But there are several Republicans who are recipients of DCCC funds.
Me.
(35,454 posts)I was wrong. Which is good to be able to say about this.
I'm blind as a bat so I expand the pages a lot and thought the amounts under the "total" column were under the "for" column for whatever reason.
So good to read and appreciate you coming back to say so.
Hekate
(100,133 posts)Hekate
(100,133 posts)BannonsLiver
(20,316 posts)I choose to meet good news with a smile, not by pissing all over it.
