House GOPers Scramble To Explain Why O'Care Repeal Bill Doesn't Apply To Them
Source: Talking Points Memo
By ALICE OLLSTEIN Published APRIL 26, 2017 11:57 AM
Republicans huddled Wednesday morning in the basement of the Capitol, their first meeting following a two-week recess, and emerged with mixed messages about a provision in the latest version of their Obamacare repeal bill that could exempt members of Congress and their staffers from some of the most radical changes to the law.
Those changesdrafted in hopes of bringing the American Health Care Act back from the political graveinclude the ability for states to waive certain regulations, allowing insurers to charge older and sicker patients much more for coverage, and allowing states to require insurance plans cover fewer essential health benefits.
The text of a new amendment released Tuesday night includes a carve-out for members of Congress, allowing them to retain all of the essential health benefits and cost protections under the Affordable Care Act.
Several members of Congress, all of whom are required by law to be on D.C.s health care exchange, admitted Wednesday that they have no idea if they can be protected from these waivers.
Read more: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/obamacare-republicans-exemption-waiver-ahca
aggiesal
(8,914 posts)What a bunch of bull $hit!
Dustlawyer
(10,495 posts)THEY HAVE NO IDEA IF THEY CAN BE PROTECTED from these waivers."
They know what affects their own insurance, I know they talked about it amongst themselves!
Ligyron
(7,632 posts)Let's see if the MSM even covers this.
I swear, if Americans let this slide I'm done with them, I think.
TeamPooka
(24,226 posts)Line up suckers.
Lanius
(599 posts)left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)"... allowing insurers to charge older and sicker patients much more for coverage"
I'm 70, with diabetes and heart problems.
karynnj
(59,503 posts)conditions.
karynnj
(59,503 posts)is on the exchange -- hoping to embarrass Democrats, who would lose at least one Senator (which they could not afford) by putting in that rule.
In retrospect, it was BRILLIANT of the Democrats to do that ... and a carve out now would be a political loser for Republicans.
greymattermom
(5,754 posts)if they declare a residence and vote outside the District. Or if they vote for House or Senate at all.
christx30
(6,241 posts)Some animals are more equal than others.
The House GOP is helpfully playing the part of the pigs.