Donald Trump to strip all funding from State Department team promoting women's rights around the w
Source: Independent
Leaked plan comes as First Daughter Ivanka defends her father's record with
Donald Trump plans to strip all funding from a State Department bureau that promotes the rights of women around the world, it has emerged.
Oxfam America led criticism of the move, saying said cutting funds for the Office of Global Womens Issues would have dire consequences for millions of people, as well as our global standing.
Documents first leaked to Foreign Policy showed plans to reduce the offices 2016 budget of $8.25 million (£6.43 million) to zero in 2018, though the Presidents budget will still have to make it past Congress.
Its clear that womens empowerment and gender equality are on the chopping block in this budget, Oxfam vice president for policy, Paul OBrien, said.
............
Read more: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/donald-trump-budget-2018-state-department-cut-office-global-womens-issues-oxfam-ivanka-a7701631.html
Trump would do this just to spit in Hillary's face!!
Caroline O.? @RVAwonk 3h3 hours ago
Caroline O. Retweeted AM Joy w/Joy Reid
Hillary Clinton established the Office of Global Women's Issues as Secretary of State. Now Trump is working to dismantle it.
AM Joy w/Joy Reid?Verified account @amjoyshow
#Trump to strip all funding from State Department team promoting women's rights around the world
Link to tweet
underpants
(182,803 posts)Solly Mack
(90,767 posts)tanyev
(42,559 posts)And then her foundation can funnel it into Trump bank accounts.
notdarkyet
(2,226 posts)cstanleytech
(26,291 posts)RKP5637
(67,108 posts)Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)"Here I am in all my glory. Living proof, as I sit here in the W.H., shoulder to shoulder with the President, that he cares about women and sees them as real people, as important to the world and the country."
While Trump and his team in the background repeal the fair pay act, cut funding for birth control, cut funding to promote women's rights.
Notice how she makes an appearance and statement immediately before or after the admin. does an anti-woman act. That's her job. To distract and try to present an alternate reality.
Make no mistake: She and her father are chums; she's the favorite; she is not about to think, do, or say anything to upset him or interfere with her inheritance.
Warpy
(111,261 posts)so the screaming man-baby is hitting back. This is just another temper tantrum.
Turns out all those women who booed her were absolutely right. We could have told them so.
VigilantG
(374 posts)Speak unless hubby says so!
What a despicable, sad, desperate man! He knows he is going down sooner or later and will just keep sticking it to everyone he can until he is stopped.
The Repug party is just as guilty IMO, for letting him do everything he is doing...to keep their own agenda.
cstanleytech
(26,291 posts)in the first place by empowering people like Trump by giving them a place in their party.
RKP5637
(67,108 posts)says what they all think. There used to be a distinction, but now it seems to have melded together.
bucolic_frolic
(43,163 posts)there is going to be blowback against Trump and the GOP for this upending of
American political values
The GOP calls it a culture war, but it's now larger than that, it is a war for the
soul of mankind
We. Will. Win. This.
FreepFryer
(7,077 posts)karynnj
(59,503 posts)are for the most part still there. Not a coincidence, many fight as soon as any steps back are proposed. President Obama, speaking after the election, said "You know, the path that this country has taken has never been a straight line. We zig and zag and sometimes we move in ways that some people think is forward and others think is moving back, and that's OK. " https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/11/09/transcript-president-obamas-remarks-on-donald-trumps-election/?utm_term=.19a92ea916a9
Those of us who have lived the last 50 plus years, know that women, minorities and gays are more accepted and have more rights than when we kids. While fighting to maintain those rights, we should recognize that we have had wins that are are now deeply embedded. Our children started at a different point than we did. Where a teacher in my Junior year of high school would not let me take "mathematician" when we looked at possible careers, by the time that I graduated college, women (including me) graduating with good grades as math majors were in high demand. My daughter and her fiancee have had only positive experiences planning their wedding - unlike my sister and the woman she had to wait 30 years before she could marry under the law. On both of these things, it is not just laws, but the culture that has changed.
I think what we need to do is to work on getting back one of the Houses of Congress in 2018 and winning back the Presidency. Note that anything Trump has done unilaterally, can be reversed unilaterally. The biggest damage that will come from 2016 is the shift on the Supreme Court.
As to the State Department advocacy for women, the fact that Trump has not even nominated people, other than the Secretary, for any of the political positions and his SD has removed career people at the top level suggests to me that this announcement was designed to infuriate exactly the people infuriated. It is ONE small part of dismantling a valuable resource the US has had in the world. That department - and likely the ones dealing with climate change, global health, USAID etc -- will all have to be fought for in Congress when the State Department budget is approved. Here, we may find surprising allies. GW Bush has already advocated that PEPFAR, which was passed when he was President, that deals with AIDS and other disease is something that we need to continue. The AIDS piece started as Democratic legislation (Kerry, who gained Frist as cosponsor) that became a bipartisan SFRC bill (Lugar/Biden) that Bush included in his budget. We WILL lose most battles, but we need to fight as hard as we can - so when we take power again there is support for them.
bucolic_frolic
(43,163 posts)will be virtually irreversible. The faster we get Russian influence investigated
the better off we will be. The coverup is underway. See Keith Olbermann #62
and #63.
karynnj
(59,503 posts)As to deregulation, if the regulation source was an executive order (ie many EPA regulations) - they can be reinstated. If they are legislation based - example Dodd/Frank - if they are overturned or weakened, they are harder to restore unless we have the numbers of votes to do it.
I suspect that where the investigation is going is towards making people, below Trump, the sole scapegoats. However, I suspect that if Republicans begin to see Trump as a liability, he will be dropped on a dime. Iran Contra and Watergate are examples where some investigators - with differing success - DID follow the cases upward. In both cases, it was against Presidents who had earlier been far more respected than Trump ever was.
However, the removal of Trump -- leads to Pence, who is more of an advocate for the religious right than Trump. He is no better on social issues or the environment.
C_U_L8R
(45,002 posts)Why does she even bother.
Achilleaze
(15,543 posts)And of course the republican assault is led by their puny-handed Draft-Dodger & Pussy Grabber-in-Chief.
Deplorable.
madaboutharry
(40,211 posts)Lucky Luciano
(11,256 posts)Nitram
(22,801 posts)Brogrizzly
(145 posts)yuiyoshida
(41,831 posts)When you sign up to be a Right Winger GOP member, you sign up, in your own blood.
OldRedneck
(1,397 posts)After all, Ivanka just returned from Germany where she told an international gathering of women that her father was the greatest champion of women's rights ever.
She wouldn't lie, would she??
Glimmer of Hope
(5,823 posts)yuiyoshida
(41,831 posts)Fuck all the Trumps, the Republicans and especially FOX NEWS!
riversedge
(70,221 posts)yuiyoshida
(41,831 posts)smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)leftyladyfrommo
(18,868 posts)I look at his picture now and just can't believe how ugly he is.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)I don't know if it's because my hatred for him keeps growing or if he acutally IS getting uglier.
leftyladyfrommo
(18,868 posts)Everyone in that whole family just looks awful to me.
riversedge
(70,221 posts)WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)own destinies, unencumbered by financial and other help.
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,340 posts)or at least the rights of Ivanka.
Ivanka, of course, praises his father for his support of her rights.
njhoneybadger
(3,910 posts)karynnj
(59,503 posts)unless he helps their agenda. IF he has done something impeachable or something that even looks impeachable, that signal could be used by them to keep him following their agenda -- especially as he really does not have one.