Trump attorney didn't want him to sign financial disclosure
Source: Associated Press
MAY 19, 2017 11:21 AM
BY JULIE BYKOWICZ
Associated Press
WASHINGTON
Donald Trump's attorneys originally wanted him to submit an updated financial disclosure without certifying the information as true, according to correspondence with the Office of Government Ethics.
Attorney Sheri Dillon said she saw no need for Trump to sign his 2016 personal financial disclosure because he is filing voluntarily this year. But OGE director Walter Shaub said his office would only work with Dillon if she agreed to follow the typical process of having Trump make the certification. That is standard practice for the thousands of financial disclosure forms OGE processes each year.
The Associated Press obtained the letters under a Freedom of Information Act request.
"As we discussed, OGE will provide this assistance on the condition that the President is committed to certifying that the contents of his report are true, complete and correct," Shaub wrote in a May 10 letter. "When we met on April 27, 2017, you requested that he be excused from providing this certification."
Read more: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/national-politics/article151489557.html
brooklynite
(94,974 posts)mahatmakanejeeves
(57,740 posts)lark
(23,193 posts)Must be really hard trying to keep the fleas on this dog from being excruciatingly evident, but this effort is obviously doomed to failure.
Leghorn21
(13,527 posts)interest (I think it was) in January and thought, wow, look at this guy, publicly speaking the truth (ie, standing up against) this big phoney "president" - GOOD MAN
elleng
(131,374 posts)Sad we feel need to call someone who does his job a hero, but in this case, it has merit.
SunSeeker
(51,798 posts)The fact that she is still licensed to practice law shows what a joke bar discipline is.
Madam45for2923
(7,178 posts)The lawyers did not want him to sign his financial disclosure form because he would be committing perjury.
So I guess not handing anything in then?
eggplant
(3,919 posts)Can't *knowingly* let your client lie under oath, you know.
Madam45for2923
(7,178 posts)Madam45for2923
(7,178 posts)Link to tweet
Susan HennesseyVerified account
@Susan_Hennessey
Lawfare Managing Editor, Brookings Fellow, Former IC attorney.