Sheriff David Clarke plagiarized portions of his master's thesis on homeland security
Source: CNN
Controversial Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke, who this week announced he will be joining Donald Trump's administration as assistant secretary in the Department of Homeland Security, plagiarized sections of his 2013 master's thesis on US security, a CNN KFile review has found.
Read more: http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2017/05/politics/sheriff-clarke-plagiarism/
Julian Englis
(2,309 posts)n/t
kwassa
(23,340 posts)The hits just keep on coming.
Ligyron
(7,632 posts)He'll fit right in with the gang.
nycbos
(6,034 posts)Lucky Luciano
(11,255 posts)47of74
(18,470 posts)That he's being persecuted because of his love of the giant orange man baby or that rules are for other people. Again because of that fucking orange man baby.
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)with a smidgen of ethics is gonna hear Trump's call to duty. And with Clarke, it's a call to "doody" that beckons!
caballojm
(272 posts)Although I think it's more of a garbage truck than a basket.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)dawn5651
(603 posts)how did his thesis get by the professor...don't they bother checking to see if you stole someone elses work...because that is what plagiarism is..
TNNurse
(6,926 posts)ailsagirl
(22,896 posts)cubbies01
(85 posts)Witch Hunt😂
dalton99a
(81,485 posts)Igel
(35,300 posts)Others are just padding for the report, on the assumption nobody's going to take the time to look at the data or methodology when there's a juicy conclusion to be gobbled down.
A quick check shows that some of the examples are fairly common text. Boilerplate. In a few cases I've read the "quotes" here. Hard to avoid some things. I mean, I know I've read "some of the examples are fairly common text" before I wrote it, but I'd be hard-put to cite it. Same for "padding for the report". Serious "investigation" would rule those out as inevitable.
In other cases, "a few words" results in absurdities.
And in others, it's obvious an attempt was made to specifically avoid a quote. Even if it meant "suspected terror suspects" was in Clarke's text instead of "suspected terrorists". This is the kind of change that a lot of teachers along the way say to make to avoid making the text look like a quote pastiche. I just graded a bunch of high school projects where students following instruction--sometimes students in college-level classes--did exactly this. You break up quotes, interpolate a few words, drop out a few, re-arrange the text and you've met the requirements of not having a word-for-word quote.
I await the verdict.
NoMoreRepugs
(9,423 posts)more bizarre.
NCjack
(10,279 posts)Crowman2009
(2,495 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)obamanut2012
(26,072 posts)LiberalFighter
(50,921 posts)How was he able to do that and his job as Sheriff?