Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Equinox Moon

(6,344 posts)
Sun May 21, 2017, 01:21 PM May 2017

Revealed: Facebook's internal rulebook on sex, terrorism and violence: LEAKED POLICIES

Source: The Guardian

21 May 2017
Leaked policies guiding moderators on what content to allow are likely to fuel debate about social media giant’s ethics.

Facebook’s secret rules and guidelines for deciding what its 2 billion users can post on the site are revealed for the first time in a Guardian investigation that will fuel the global debate about the role and ethics of the social media giant.

The Guardian has seen more than 100 internal training manuals, spreadsheets and flowcharts that give unprecedented insight into the blueprints Facebook has used to moderate issues such as violence, hate speech, terrorism, pornography, racism and self-harm.

They illustrate difficulties faced by executives scrabbling to react to new challenges such as “revenge porn” – and the challenges for moderators, who say they are overwhelmed by the volume of work, which means they often have “just 10 seconds” to make a decision.

“Facebook cannot keep control of its content,” said one source. “It has grown too big, too quickly.”

Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/news/2017/may/21/revealed-facebook-internal-rulebook-sex-terrorism-violence



This looks like a Guardian exclusive. There are several articles on their front page.
www.theguardian.com

Why leak this?

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Revealed: Facebook's internal rulebook on sex, terrorism and violence: LEAKED POLICIES (Original Post) Equinox Moon May 2017 OP
"Why leak this?" WhiskeyGrinder May 2017 #1
I think you meant to say mercuryblues May 2017 #2
Thank you, you're right! WhiskeyGrinder May 2017 #3
It's Sunday. KatyMan May 2017 #5
Good gawd! Control-Z May 2017 #6
Well, when you think Sunday is Saturday and you really mean it KatyMan May 2017 #7
A little embarrassed to say I really meant it. Control-Z May 2017 #9
As usual, the discussion mistakingly brings up the "alarm free speech advocates" canard. PSPS May 2017 #4
Big sites like FB can't say exact policies or people will game them. Leak gets general idea out. Bernardo de La Paz May 2017 #8

WhiskeyGrinder

(22,309 posts)
1. "Why leak this?"
Sun May 21, 2017, 01:34 PM
May 2017

Last edited Sun May 21, 2017, 02:26 PM - Edit history (1)

So people who use Facebook know more about the policies they're supposed to adhere to. So they understand that those policies are enforced by people who are overworked and underpaid. So users can put pressure on Facebook to walk the walk and not just talk the talk. Transparency, in this case, is good.

KatyMan

(4,183 posts)
7. Well, when you think Sunday is Saturday and you really mean it
Sun May 21, 2017, 05:56 PM
May 2017

You get an extra weekend day. It's a rule. Take tomorrow off.

PSPS

(13,580 posts)
4. As usual, the discussion mistakingly brings up the "alarm free speech advocates" canard.
Sun May 21, 2017, 04:09 PM
May 2017

There is no "free speech" or "first amendment" when it comes to a private company and its publications or products. Facebook is under no obligation whatsoever to allow anything at all, let alone what's discussed in the article. It makes me laugh when they feel they have to "decide" that "snap the bitch's neck" is really OK and will be "allowed." Try to place an ad in the New York Times with such a phrase and see if they'll publish it.

Facebook is in it for nothing more than the money. The more people that use it, the more money they get for the advertising they run. Like most self-entitled under-taxed billionaires, Zuckerberg has no social conscience, no decorum, no sense of decency.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Revealed: Facebook's inte...