This message was self-deleted by its author

[DonViejo]

This message was self-deleted by its author (DonViejo) on Mon May 22, 2017, 12:48 PM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.

[lark]

1. Question - why did she do this?

Is this another Ruskie adventure?

[sandensea]

2. Sounds like one of Roger Stone's ops

À la Elliot Spitzer.

[Hortensis]

5. Girl and her family were "strong Trump enthusiasts."

From the WhoWhatWhy link in the article posted:

• The girl was presented in news accounts — and Weiner’s plea deal — as being 15 at the time, that is, under the age of consent in her state. She was not.

• Weiner’s victim and her family were not, as represented, Clinton fans — they actually were strong Trump enthusiasts. Her story was trusted in part because she was characterized as having no axe to grind with Clinton or the Democrats.

• Weiner’s “sexting” partner was not simply a victim. Contrary to tabloid accounts, she initiated the contact with Weiner. And she went out of her way to seek advice from a GOP-associated figure behind prior efforts to harm Weiner and other Democrats.

I'd like to hear more about that "GOP-associated figure." Not to rule out Ruskie involvement, of course, but Russia was merely supplementing the blizzard of lies "GOP-associated figures," including and/or as well as much of the MSM, were blanketing America with here.

[lark]

6. I got that.

I just wonder who put it up to her, who suggested this in the first place?

[Hortensis]

8. We'll probably hear. Likely that "GOP-associated figure"

was someone her parents were acquainted with. Makes me think of the slimy behavior of some of the children at the Trump rallies right in front of, and with full approval of, their proud parents.

[StevieM]

3. Not at all surprising. In fact, I think it is pretty expected. What were the odds that the GOP

had all those things play out in a way that coincidentally allowed Comey to do his damage?

[tonedevil]

4. So...

Rep. Weiner didn't raise any of this at his trial?

[Bradical79]

7. He's guilty regardless

She's allowed to. It's not relevant to his case. It's only potentially relevant to authorities if they want to incestigate if an adult put her up to it.

[atreides1]

10. Really??

If she was 16, which is the age of consent in North Carolina, and he was charged based on her age being 15, which would have been a violation under North Carolina law, what exactly is he guilty of, other then exceptional stupidity and being really creepy!!!

[Bradical79]

11. I thought he was guilty in NY

which I think has a age of consent of 17.

[OrwellwasRight]

9. This is a duplicate thread.

[vkkv]

12. DUPE THREAD - LOCK IT UP OR REMOVE DON.

Come on man!

You're a HOST here.