Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

blue-wave

(4,352 posts)
Sat May 27, 2017, 11:24 AM May 2017

McMaster says 'not concerned' after Kushner back-channel reports

Source: Reuters

Asked about reports that Donald Trump's son-in-law had tried to set up a secret channel of communication with Russia before the president took office, U.S. National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster said that so-called "back-channeling" was normal.

McMaster declined to speak specifically about the case of Jared Kushner, who serves as a senior adviser to Trump, but when asked if it would concern him if someone in the administration tried to set up a back channel with the Russian embassy or the Kremlin, he replied "no".

"We have back-channel communications with any number of individual (countries). So generally speaking, about back-channel communications, what that allows you to do is communicate in a discreet manner," McMaster said.

Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-russia-kushner-idUSKBN18N0NA?il=0



WTF? They are trying to normalize this now? They can't dodge the law by trying to fool the public with false notions.
82 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
McMaster says 'not concerned' after Kushner back-channel reports (Original Post) blue-wave May 2017 OP
"Hell, it's only treason." sandensea May 2017 #1
Do those backchannels normally exist in the Russian Embassy to prevent detection by US Authorities? PubliusEnigma May 2017 #2
Like all those other "back channels" Roy Rolling May 2017 #21
We did have saint Ronnie's missile-selling channel to Iran..... lastlib May 2017 #64
I'd like to know if the W.H. has ever had a back channel comm. with Russia before. Honeycombe8 May 2017 #3
It's the first time one was established by way of a bribe. sandensea May 2017 #12
The Cuban Missile Crisis was a crisis situation, though. Honeycombe8 May 2017 #14
Surprisingly enough not fooled May 2017 #22
Oh, that guy. Hugh Hewitt. I haven't seen him enuf to form an opinion, but I can guess. nt Honeycombe8 May 2017 #61
Get used to seeing him padah513 May 2017 #72
The bribe was in the form of millions of Russian "loans" to Trump and Kushner interests. sandensea May 2017 #37
Ahhhhh. I knew there were business deals, but not sure what exactly. Honeycombe8 May 2017 #62
Amazing, isn't it. Republicans wanted someone who'd run the White House like his businesses. sandensea May 2017 #63
The huge difference here is Kushner tried to get a back channel set up with the Russians... brush May 2017 #74
The stupid things people will do for money. sandensea May 2017 #79
NOT IN THE SOVIET CONSULATE, TO AVOID THE US GOVERNMENT. WinkyDink May 2017 #28
McMaster should be treated like a traitor just like the rest of them. dalton99a May 2017 #4
Morning Joe pointed out that after McMaster's statement about Trump giving Russia secret.... Honeycombe8 May 2017 #17
Makes me wonder what they offered him to provide cover. Ilsa May 2017 #50
IMO, it's too late Phoenix61 May 2017 #55
+1 uponit7771 May 2017 #82
sounds like an attempt to coverup..... beachbum bob May 2017 #5
Lipstick on a pig Marthe48 May 2017 #6
So, McBastard is in on the coverup too. Still In Wisconsin May 2017 #7
McMaster is not concerned because he is not involved; not at risk of prosecution. . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz May 2017 #8
I am afraid........ dawnie51 May 2017 #9
Yes dawnie51, I have the same considerations that you have. I just turned 72. onecent May 2017 #65
I know how you feel. Honeycombe8 May 2017 #67
sometimes i am glad i have no grandchildren. mopinko May 2017 #71
Generally speaking? Mr. Ected May 2017 #10
This happened BEFORE trump took office, so the "administration" did NOT do it because shraby May 2017 #11
THIS BumRushDaShow May 2017 #33
WTF? BackChannels might be SOP for IC /DoD but not for the mutherfukkking SIL of the PEOTUS. MedusaX May 2017 #13
Once upon a time, that guy had a good reputation. Now he's a joke. Squinch May 2017 #15
Malcom Nance FM123 May 2017 #16
Thanks. Wanted to see what M. Nance had to say about it. elleng May 2017 #58
Wonder if he'd be more concerned if it was Hillary Clinton's son in law oberliner May 2017 #18
Are those back channels secretly hidden from US law enforcement? Kablooie May 2017 #19
Kushner was up to no good. There simply is no comparison, and that should be our SOP WinkyDink May 2017 #29
We must remember jehop61 May 2017 #20
Your point being??? atreides1 May 2017 #51
"They can't dodge the law by trying to fool the public with false notions." TheDebbieDee May 2017 #23
I agree with your statement blue-wave May 2017 #69
It's a damn spy ring kyburbonkid May 2017 #24
Exactly, 100%. In 1943 Hitchcock would be making the movie. We are dealing with ESPIONAGE! WinkyDink May 2017 #27
McMaster revealed his lack of integrity the first time he spoke. Don't expect differently now. WinkyDink May 2017 #25
Actually... cisco man May 2017 #40
It was my understanding that, as an active member of the military, McMaster HAD to Leghorn21 May 2017 #47
True dat. WinkyDink May 2017 #49
Guess he is another kiss ass. He defended DTs talks w Alice11111 May 2017 #26
McMaster went to work for a man Progressive dog May 2017 #30
What's the deal with McMasters? vlyons May 2017 #31
I wonder about this, too janterry May 2017 #38
Yeah not fooled May 2017 #39
So very true vlyons May 2017 #42
"I was in the room, it didn't happen," says HR 'No Credibility' McMaster JDC May 2017 #32
Really? Did the Clinton campaign have one? logosoco May 2017 #34
It looks like McMaster s signed that loyality oath. CentralMass May 2017 #35
This message was self-deleted by its author turbinetree May 2017 #36
In any normal administration he would've been fired immediately. Kablooie May 2017 #41
No transition team had ever done anything remotely similar. Career. Respect. Lost. onecaliberal May 2017 #43
Well, I'm glad to know that our National Security is in such excellent hands. milestogo May 2017 #44
Sorry Trumppers, Jedi Mind Tricks don't work in real life! Initech May 2017 #45
Like Flynn, this man was once a good soldier. Ligyron May 2017 #46
Someone remind me about why Hillary's private server was a big deal perdita9 May 2017 #48
If he was a decent person he would not have this job. lark May 2017 #52
That level of Idiocracy is what we're up against! n/t RKP5637 May 2017 #53
If he's not concerned it's because he's part of it. Kablooie May 2017 #54
Another cover-up artist emulatorloo May 2017 #56
So McMaster is a Russian agent? OregonBlue May 2017 #57
Bullshit matt819 May 2017 #59
McMaster should have known that working for Trump would ruin his reputation. The Wielding Truth May 2017 #60
WTF?????????????????? OldRedneck May 2017 #66
McMaster auctioned his reputation, dchill May 2017 #68
All those intel guys interviewed about it the past few days certainly disagree. Amaryllis May 2017 #70
This line in particular smells like BS to me: DeltaLitProf May 2017 #73
McMaster isn't even concerned about any job he does. He's over the hill. onecent May 2017 #75
I'm on the fence about McMaster. Tatiana May 2017 #76
E' tu McMaster?? benld74 May 2017 #77
It must be contagious. McMaster has lost his mind too! AgadorSparticus May 2017 #78
Why would they want a "back channel" after they hacked our elections? kentuck May 2017 #80
Jared's BFF, Bubba jack69 May 2017 #81

sandensea

(21,627 posts)
1. "Hell, it's only treason."
Sat May 27, 2017, 11:28 AM
May 2017

"Why would should anyone worry about that - least of all a military officer."

PubliusEnigma

(1,583 posts)
2. Do those backchannels normally exist in the Russian Embassy to prevent detection by US Authorities?
Sat May 27, 2017, 11:28 AM
May 2017

I don't think so, Mr. McMaster.

Roy Rolling

(6,915 posts)
21. Like all those other "back channels"
Sat May 27, 2017, 12:22 PM
May 2017

Nothing unusual, it's like all those back channels Trump established with the U.K., France, Australia, Japan, and the rest of our allies around the world. I'm sure there are special communications between Trump and them, the same way he had a direct server-to-server links from Trump Tower to Russian banking connections.

That is sarcasm in case anyone misunderstands. The only back channel they have is with Vlad Putin.

lastlib

(23,224 posts)
64. We did have saint Ronnie's missile-selling channel to Iran.....
Sat May 27, 2017, 07:07 PM
May 2017

...and his drug-selling, nun-killing, thug-buddies, the contras.....

But, hell, what's a little treason in high places among thug-buddies??

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
3. I'd like to know if the W.H. has ever had a back channel comm. with Russia before.
Sat May 27, 2017, 11:28 AM
May 2017

Or if this was the first time.

sandensea

(21,627 posts)
12. It's the first time one was established by way of a bribe.
Sat May 27, 2017, 11:50 AM
May 2017

We've had many in the past - most famously, between Kennedy and Khrushchev during the Cuban Missile Crisis.

Never, that we know, one that's basically a hustle.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
14. The Cuban Missile Crisis was a crisis situation, though.
Sat May 27, 2017, 11:53 AM
May 2017

And that would not have been for a "friendly" reason.

I didn't read that a bribe was involved with Kushner & this channel. Just that he had made that request of the Russian rep.

not fooled

(5,801 posts)
22. Surprisingly enough
Sat May 27, 2017, 12:24 PM
May 2017

the usually worthless Brian Williams jumped all over Hugh Hewitt last night when the latter tried to equate jarhead's actions with previous, historical cases of backchannel communications. As Williams pointed out, in the past such contact has been set up "for the good of the country", i.e. facilitating communication over sensitive matters. Not trying to collude with a foreign hostile power in order to grift and steal and evade legitimate scrutiny by our nation's intelligence services.

Of course, on another note, WTH is the execrable Hugh Hewitt doing on MSNBC, being passed off as a credible commentator? Pathetic attempt. But, lots of people watching don't know what a kook he is. I detect the slimy hand of Andy Lack.

padah513

(2,502 posts)
72. Get used to seeing him
Sun May 28, 2017, 04:35 AM
May 2017

I read that MSNBC is giving him a show on the weekends. Sorry, don't know how to link.

sandensea

(21,627 posts)
37. The bribe was in the form of millions of Russian "loans" to Trump and Kushner interests.
Sat May 27, 2017, 01:32 PM
May 2017

Both of which were disgraced and practically bankrupt before Putin's cutouts stepped in.

And God only knows what else.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
62. Ahhhhh. I knew there were business deals, but not sure what exactly.
Sat May 27, 2017, 06:30 PM
May 2017

Yeah, then Putin has Trump and Kushner by the ya-yas. But Trump is not putting on an act when he acts like he loves the Russians.

sandensea

(21,627 posts)
63. Amazing, isn't it. Republicans wanted someone who'd run the White House like his businesses.
Sat May 27, 2017, 06:58 PM
May 2017

And he certainly is.

brush

(53,776 posts)
74. The huge difference here is Kushner tried to get a back channel set up with the Russians...
Sun May 28, 2017, 09:40 AM
May 2017

using THEIR crpytographic equipment.

Why would he do that? What is there to hide from our own intel agencies?

The dumb thing though is trying to set it up with the Russians on public lines with the Russian ambassador, whose communications are routinely monitored by our intel agencies.

Not too smart there, Kushner. You've moved into espionage territory.

sandensea

(21,627 posts)
79. The stupid things people will do for money.
Sun May 28, 2017, 01:42 PM
May 2017

Thank you for that clarification, too. The news media often ignores key details like that, as if trying to somehow trivialize the scandal.

They'll have to build a new wing in some federal prison to fit everyone in the Trump White House. Don't drop the soap guys!

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
17. Morning Joe pointed out that after McMaster's statement about Trump giving Russia secret....
Sat May 27, 2017, 11:56 AM
May 2017

When McMaster came out and made a weird statement implying that Trump had not given Russians any top secret classified intel, and then Trump admitted it the next day....Morning Joe says that should be McMaster's 60 second warning. If it happens again, McMaster, who doesn't need this job, should leave, so he doesn't ruin his stellar reputation. Everyone would respect his decision to leave. But if he stays and continues to become another Kellyanne Conway, he risks ruining his reputation, esp since he doesn't need the gig, in the first place.

Ilsa

(61,695 posts)
50. Makes me wonder what they offered him to provide cover.
Sat May 27, 2017, 02:30 PM
May 2017

Is there kompromat on him? Debt? A desire to be richer so he can dump his family and start over comfortably?

I'm disappointed. I wonder why he is willing to trade his good name to give his nation over to Putin?

Marthe48

(16,949 posts)
6. Lipstick on a pig
Sat May 27, 2017, 11:42 AM
May 2017

high heels on a guy with hairy legs

These traitors can dress up the back channel with sequins and cheap perfume, and it is still TREASON

dawnie51

(959 posts)
9. I am afraid........
Sat May 27, 2017, 11:46 AM
May 2017

truly. I think the takeover is complete. These traitors are everywhere. The congress is full of them and refuse to do ANYTHING to stop this. Now the military. This McMaster, the shining light of reason, is complacent in the face of this bullshit. The press is silenced, not even allowed to have access to the administration. I fear it is done, and I am afraid for my children. I am an old lady, I will not have to tolerate this much longer. But my grandchildren will. God help us.

onecent

(6,096 posts)
65. Yes dawnie51, I have the same considerations that you have. I just turned 72.
Sat May 27, 2017, 07:44 PM
May 2017

I am an old lady, and wonder what's going to happen to the grandchildren. What's going to happen to our Medicare.????
Will there be anything in it come Jan? What about social security, and my husband's Pension he was getting is cut in half,
for me starting in Jan.

Dump is making all these people think we were going to have a job, and a raise...and all this crap.....and none of the things
he has told them have ever come true.

I didn't vote for him, thank God, but all my friends did.......It's makes it hard to call them and give them what's going on
with Dump....they won't listen, think they know everything.....

I think I was born at the right time, and my end isn't far away...but sometimes I wish it was sooner... I remember always
battling Bush for 8 years.....I could hardly wait til he left.....I wish he was back now..... But I feel the same way with Dump,
that I am watching what is happening....but it's the same as when I was trying to get Bush out.

Oh well...I can't believe how much Dump pushes himself....no sleep, tweeting all night long....but he is such a simpleton, and why can't CIA OR FBI take care of him and his followers....???

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
67. I know how you feel.
Sat May 27, 2017, 08:09 PM
May 2017

I am trying to keep those feelings at bay. But I feel as if the Russians are in control of the White House, and partly the Congress. We've been shown ties among Ryan, McConnell & the Russians, now. Nunez, the former head of the House Intel Committee, in cahoots with the White House on the investigation.

I'm 63. I've never seen anything like this occurring in the country before. Never thought I'd see it.

BUT...take heart. The JUDICIARY hasn't been taken over. More than half the Congress hasn't been taken over. Our intel agencies haven't been taken over. We also have a Special Counsel, now, as well. We have the FREE PRESS. And we have constitutional protections for protest...for the time being, as well as protest-prone citizenry. We also have SOME Republicans who would put country over party (I hope).

All is not lost. We can't be sure that this is heading toward impeachment, but it looks like it may be.

It's the system that is supposed to be set up to protect us against this. Let's see if it works. Three branches of equal power, performing a checks and balances on each other. Trump has been unable to interfere with the Judiciary. We also have an opposing major political party: The Democrats. Though some have been weak in the past, I have been proud lately at the actions they've taken, and how they have stood up to Trump and the Republican Congress. Schumer & Pelosi, Franken, and the others are fighting like crazy & not letting anything slip by.



mopinko

(70,090 posts)
71. sometimes i am glad i have no grandchildren.
Sun May 28, 2017, 03:19 AM
May 2017

not real likely i will. usually sad about that, but for the last few months, not so much.

Mr. Ected

(9,670 posts)
10. Generally speaking?
Sat May 27, 2017, 11:47 AM
May 2017

"generally speaking, about back-channel communications, what that allows you to do is communicate in a discreet manner,..."

No, asshole, we're not speaking generally.

We're speaking very specifically. You know that, you no-good embarrassment to your uniform asswipe. This is about Jared, Trump and a plot to steal an election and then rob America blind behind our backs and beyond the scrutiny of our intelligence community.

Generally speaking only because it's a General speaking.

shraby

(21,946 posts)
11. This happened BEFORE trump took office, so the "administration" did NOT do it because
Sat May 27, 2017, 11:49 AM
May 2017

it wasn't a trump administration yet.

His whole reasoning is false and a smoke screen. He needs to be dismissed from office.

BumRushDaShow

(128,905 posts)
33. THIS
Sat May 27, 2017, 01:18 PM
May 2017

They were ALL "private citizens" because no swearing-in had occurred yet.

Funny how they act like when November 9th came around, Obama was "officially out of office" and the TFEE had "legally" taken over.

MedusaX

(1,129 posts)
13. WTF? BackChannels might be SOP for IC /DoD but not for the mutherfukkking SIL of the PEOTUS.
Sat May 27, 2017, 11:52 AM
May 2017

wow

Apparently his closeted skeletons were found by Bannon prior to his appointment...

 

WinkyDink

(51,311 posts)
29. Kushner was up to no good. There simply is no comparison, and that should be our SOP
Sat May 27, 2017, 01:07 PM
May 2017

Democratic response.

atreides1

(16,076 posts)
51. Your point being???
Sat May 27, 2017, 02:45 PM
May 2017

He's suppose to blindly follow his orders, that was the excuse used by almost everyone tried at Nuremberg...it's bullshit and it shows that McMaster, who may have had integrity at one point, has decided that it isn't that important!!!

 

TheDebbieDee

(11,119 posts)
23. "They can't dodge the law by trying to fool the public with false notions."
Sat May 27, 2017, 12:38 PM
May 2017

Yes they can... They can fool the poorly-educated/uneducated portion (which is the majority) of the US public over and over again. They've done it before and they'll do it again!

blue-wave

(4,352 posts)
69. I agree with your statement
Sat May 27, 2017, 10:53 PM
May 2017

and I should have clarified mine better. What I meant is that they cannot escape the law, the law will catch them every time. Even when they try to cover it up and fool the public.

kyburbonkid

(251 posts)
24. It's a damn spy ring
Sat May 27, 2017, 12:40 PM
May 2017

With the purpose of manipulating the actions of POTUS to favor russia. The fact that the republicans are enablers and supporters of this needs to be hammered into the heads of all Americans. If you support the republican agenda, you are by proxy supporting a filthy russian spy operation. When will they be locked up?

cisco man

(26 posts)
40. Actually...
Sat May 27, 2017, 01:59 PM
May 2017

he showed his lack of integrity when he took the freakin job! Remember how many people they WANTED & turned them down in this administration? It was obvious to virtually everyone with a brain. Some claim he took the job to be the "adult" in the room & save us from this monster, but I don't buy it. There are just too many boneheads in the military to make me think they are all exceptional. Remember...most of the military voted for this dick head.

Leghorn21

(13,524 posts)
47. It was my understanding that, as an active member of the military, McMaster HAD to
Sat May 27, 2017, 02:16 PM
May 2017

accept this "post" or retire altogether - ie, he had very little choice in the matter (unlike Mattis) -
and rumor had it he was standing ground as far as staffing his office, and was getting yelled at by dumbfuck about it - and I thought, okay, hang tough, sir -

But yes, he's gone full treason here apparently, and it's pretty tragic.

Welcome to DU, cisco man!

Alice11111

(5,730 posts)
26. Guess he is another kiss ass. He defended DTs talks w
Sat May 27, 2017, 01:01 PM
May 2017

Russians too, and he said DT did not disclose classified info, which obviously he did.

Progressive dog

(6,900 posts)
30. McMaster went to work for a man
Sat May 27, 2017, 01:16 PM
May 2017

who advocated targeting the families of his enemies. He sold his credibility to work for the least ethical and nastiest person ever to hold the office of POTUS.
Anyway, Trump and his royal family have already demonstrated their willingness to openly communicate their love for Putin, Erdogan, Duterte, and even Kim-Jon-Un; they don't need back channels to our adversaries.
This attempt at normalization of espionage will be rejected by most of the news media.

vlyons

(10,252 posts)
31. What's the deal with McMasters?
Sat May 27, 2017, 01:17 PM
May 2017

Why is a senior and distinguished US Army general defending and apologising for a treasonous greedy stupid little POS? What's in it for McMasters? Has he been corrupted with a nice retirement villa in the Riviera, a free membership at Mar-a-Lago? What' the deal? this is in no way normal. I'm saddened to see that even McMasters has been infected and slimed with Trumpitis. Sad.

 

janterry

(4,429 posts)
38. I wonder about this, too
Sat May 27, 2017, 01:40 PM
May 2017

He knows this is BS. He also knows that the Joint Chiefs of Staff, everyone at the CIA, FBI and NSA knows that he's trying to mollify the public, at the expense of the truth.

I can't imagine..................

not fooled

(5,801 posts)
39. Yeah
Sat May 27, 2017, 01:40 PM
May 2017

Another formerly distinguished military figure trashes his reputation and legacy by associating with dump. When will they learn that the fastest way to disgrace is to sign on with the dump admin?

vlyons

(10,252 posts)
42. So very true
Sat May 27, 2017, 02:02 PM
May 2017

That was my second thought. It's not like Trump's vulgarity and criminality were a hidden secret before the election. Perhaps McMasters has always had an overweening sense of hubris, and he persuaded himself that signing on was his patriotic duty. But really? An intelligent and honorable person simply does not work for Donald Trump. Even Lieberman refused a job with him! A gentleman would have turned his back and simply walked away.

So much for duty, honor, country. sigh

logosoco

(3,208 posts)
34. Really? Did the Clinton campaign have one?
Sat May 27, 2017, 01:24 PM
May 2017

I am pretty sure this is not normal. But yeah, they are working really hard to make it so.

Response to blue-wave (Original post)

Kablooie

(18,632 posts)
41. In any normal administration he would've been fired immediately.
Sat May 27, 2017, 02:01 PM
May 2017

Having a secret meeting with Russians and not reporting it on his security form is plenty of evidence to fire anyone.
After that they would probably go to trial.
It's in saying
It's insane that Trump staff can do these things and people talk about why it might be acceptable.

perdita9

(1,144 posts)
48. Someone remind me about why Hillary's private server was a big deal
Sat May 27, 2017, 02:21 PM
May 2017

Because I am seriously confused by McMaster's reasoning

lark

(23,097 posts)
52. If he was a decent person he would not have this job.
Sat May 27, 2017, 03:19 PM
May 2017

Only criminals or people who are ok with criminality need apply to work in drumpfland. McMaster isn't an idiot, so he's one or the other, either a criminal or one who tolerates them.

matt819

(10,749 posts)
59. Bullshit
Sat May 27, 2017, 05:25 PM
May 2017

And McMaster knows it.

If McMaster learned that a senior aide had contacted the Russian ambassador with a request to open up a private line of communication directly to the Kremlin, he knows full well he would've had that aid up on charges and out of the military in a flash. So, like Rosenstein and so many others, he has sacrificed a 3-decade career to ensure that the first line of his obituary will be that he shamed himself by serving in this administration.

 

OldRedneck

(1,397 posts)
66. WTF??????????????????
Sat May 27, 2017, 07:51 PM
May 2017

Excuse me, but just exactly how goddam ignorant is McMaster?

OF COURSE "We have back-channel communications with any number of individual (countries)." BUT, THOSE CHANNELS GO THROUGH OFFICIAL CHANNELS and are known to the people who have a need to know.

What Kushner was trying to do was set up a channel of communications that no one else knew about. Probably not even McMaster.

I don't give a rat's ass how many stars he has or how many books he's written. This comment is dumb, dumb, dumb.

DeltaLitProf

(769 posts)
73. This line in particular smells like BS to me:
Sun May 28, 2017, 09:13 AM
May 2017

"So it doesn't pre-expose you to any sort of content or any kind of conversation or anything. So we're not concerned about it."

What in the Hell does that actually say?

onecent

(6,096 posts)
75. McMaster isn't even concerned about any job he does. He's over the hill.
Sun May 28, 2017, 10:11 AM
May 2017

Why can't we get some younger persons interested....This guy is unbelievable!!!

Tatiana

(14,167 posts)
76. I'm on the fence about McMaster.
Sun May 28, 2017, 10:27 AM
May 2017

I think he might be the mole and working with others in the IC.

So, if he is, I want him to stay where he is. We need someone who can prevent something truly disastrous from happening on the inside of this traitorous cabal.

But, if he's carrying water for Trump I hope he gets what's coming to him.

His reputation is already trashed, so all he has at this point is duty to country.

kentuck

(111,089 posts)
80. Why would they want a "back channel" after they hacked our elections?
Sun May 28, 2017, 10:51 PM
May 2017

That doesn't make sense to me.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»McMaster says 'not concer...