Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

freddyvh

(276 posts)
Wed Sep 6, 2017, 06:38 PM Sep 2017

Charles Manson follower Leslie Van Houten granted parole by California board

Source: KTVU

Leslie Van Houten, the youngest of Charles Mason's murderous followers, has been granted parole by a California board.

Van Houten, who was 19 when she killed for Manson in 1969, appeared before a parole panel for the 21st time Wednesday.

Gov. Jerry Brown now has a 120-day period to affirm, reverse or take no action on the decision.

Read more: http://www.ktvu.com/news/279099552-story



What will Jerry Brown do?


126 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Charles Manson follower Leslie Van Houten granted parole by California board (Original Post) freddyvh Sep 2017 OP
here's a link, no story yet uppityperson Sep 2017 #1
Governor Jerry Brown will be the one to decide whether she should be released from prison after 40 still_one Sep 2017 #2
Brown rejected her release last year. LenaBaby61 Sep 2017 #60
I wouldn't even venture a guess what he will do still_one Sep 2017 #61
Good, it's time janterry Sep 2017 #3
"It's time"? For a very sick and twisted murder, complete with post-mortem atrocities? Don't bother WinkyDink Sep 2017 #5
Yes janterry Sep 2017 #6
Do we believe in justice and mercy... yallerdawg Sep 2017 #9
Justice & mercy are not always interchangeable. 7962 Sep 2017 #15
A message? yallerdawg Sep 2017 #20
Ok in order to reduce prison populations, let's release low level drug offenders... Lucky Luciano Sep 2017 #28
I've got a better idea Major Nikon Sep 2017 #30
Yes, this is true. mountain grammy Sep 2017 #49
Possibly Major Nikon Sep 2017 #53
And that too. So very true. mountain grammy Sep 2017 #54
Yep nt duhneece Sep 2017 #72
The purpose of prison is not just to protect society. It's for punishment. Honeycombe8 Sep 2017 #56
The purpose of prison is just to protect society Major Nikon Sep 2017 #66
Actually, no. The purposes of prison include accountability for a crime. Honeycombe8 Sep 2017 #69
Accountability protects society Major Nikon Sep 2017 #73
agree.. mountain grammy Sep 2017 #74
The prison population has nothing to do with releasing murderers. 7962 Sep 2017 #91
Yea, crazy people evaluate parole periods and jail time when deciding to murder someone. FFS! n/t USALiberal Sep 2017 #33
She wasn't crazy. Just evil. nt Honeycombe8 Sep 2017 #57
40 years in prison from age 20 treestar Sep 2017 #106
No longer being a danger isnt the point. Murderers of this type shouldnt get out. 7962 Sep 2017 #120
It's called punishment and justice for a reason. There's no correcting what she did. Honeycombe8 Sep 2017 #55
What we now know about brain development and the lack of consequential ... duhneece Sep 2017 #71
I agree. BigDemVoter Sep 2017 #63
She's 68. Her term was life WITH the possibility of parole, not life without parole Warpy Sep 2017 #34
Actually I think she got the death penalty leftynyc Sep 2017 #95
She also had more than one trial Warpy Sep 2017 #102
Yeah, when you hang a pregnant woman from the ceiling and cut the child out of her body, just fer Midnight Writer Sep 2017 #78
I am pretty sure that didn't happen. PoindexterOglethorpe Sep 2017 #81
You are right. She had been dragged around by the noose around her neck, her breast was removed, Midnight Writer Sep 2017 #83
No - she wasn't there for the Tate murders leftynyc Sep 2017 #96
first, she wasn't there Warpy Sep 2017 #87
You're thinking of Susan Atkins treestar Sep 2017 #107
Looks like people dont care how absolutely heinous those murders were nini Sep 2017 #86
Look up some of the crime scene photos nini Sep 2017 #76
I agree Skittles Sep 2017 #79
Story true. But Brown will put the kibosh on the parole. WinkyDink Sep 2017 #4
The goal of the Manson family was to start a race war ripcord Sep 2017 #7
What Manson Started aeromanKC Sep 2017 #23
Calling it sympathy is a wingnut talking point and intellectually bankrupt Major Nikon Sep 2017 #39
He said he wanted to start a race war. But seems like jealousy & revenge were part of it. Honeycombe8 Sep 2017 #58
I don't know. But... dawn frenzy adams Sep 2017 #8
These days, the opposite would probably happen. 7962 Sep 2017 #17
This is why I still support the Death Penalty FLPanhandle Sep 2017 #10
And thats exactly what is already starting to happen; 7962 Sep 2017 #18
I would support the death penalty for Manson BigmanPigman Sep 2017 #19
OK, so some deserve it and some don't, I get it. n/t USALiberal Sep 2017 #37
What happens when they catch on to your plan? ProgressiveValue Sep 2017 #46
That is what happened to one of those female murderers. BigmanPigman Sep 2017 #48
Meanwhile Norway did away with both with far greater success Major Nikon Sep 2017 #32
Norway is a tiny country with a low crime rate. Very different. Honeycombe8 Sep 2017 #59
Kinda like saying the answer to a concussion problem is to get bigger bats Major Nikon Sep 2017 #65
No. It's because it's a tiny country w/o a big crime problem. Honeycombe8 Sep 2017 #68
By crime index they are 47th compared to 44th for the US Major Nikon Sep 2017 #70
Norway, where Anders Behring Breivik customerserviceguy Sep 2017 #67
Seriously? leftynyc Sep 2017 #97
I was being facetious customerserviceguy Sep 2017 #98
Agree leftynyc Sep 2017 #101
We can both agree on both points. n/t customerserviceguy Sep 2017 #126
Wow, I guess you admire the other countries who love the DP? China and Iran are the top 2! Congrats. USALiberal Sep 2017 #36
Don't forget Saudi Arabia Major Nikon Sep 2017 #40
I wouldnt make US law based on what other countries do or dont do. 7962 Sep 2017 #121
Death is too dignified for monsters. Xolodno Sep 2017 #84
It's purely political. Jake Stern Sep 2017 #11
Boooo! applegrove Sep 2017 #12
Is she still dangerous? (n/t) forgotmylogin Sep 2017 #13
she hasn't been dangerous for over 40 years Skittles Sep 2017 #80
She has been in prison for nearly 50 years. madaboutharry Sep 2017 #14
I totally agree. n/t Chemisse Sep 2017 #47
Only she should get parole. MFM008 Sep 2017 #16
OJ was convicted for armed robbery. He was acquitted Drahthaardogs Sep 2017 #89
I know MFM008 Sep 2017 #117
Yes, but still Drahthaardogs Sep 2017 #119
Didn't she get parole last year and Brown turned it down? LeftInTX Sep 2017 #21
If he did it was an act of mercy. PatrickforO Sep 2017 #25
s to let the Parole Board do their job obamanut2012 Sep 2017 #22
Well, she's 67 and has made no contribution to Social Security. PatrickforO Sep 2017 #24
No, she won't janterry Sep 2017 #26
She could make good money on the speaker curcuit FLPanhandle Sep 2017 #31
Hmm. I guess I'm a bleeding heart. PatrickforO Sep 2017 #35
They did get the death penalty in 1971, but the US Supreme Court ruled the death penalty Midwestern Democrat Sep 2017 #45
I remember those days, though I was young. NO ONE who was remotely normal... Honeycombe8 Sep 2017 #62
I don't think any of us can say treestar Sep 2017 #110
Yes, I can. I KNOW for a fact that I would never ever NEVER EVER harm or kill anyone... Honeycombe8 Sep 2017 #123
she should do anti-drug PSA's n/t SethH Sep 2017 #38
She could do all that from jail treestar Sep 2017 #109
Aren't there laws preventing criminals from profiting from books, etc. about their crimes? LongTomH Sep 2017 #113
She'll be fine. Books, speaking engagements but JenniferJuniper Sep 2017 #42
I knew her brother a long time ago in LA . sweet man. fierywoman Sep 2017 #52
WOW.... LovingA2andMI Sep 2017 #27
What do you mean, Aunt Leslie's coming to visit ? eppur_se_muova Sep 2017 #29
She murdered someone in cold blood and in my opinion should serve Life in Prison/no parole iluvtennis Sep 2017 #41
16 stab wounds if I remember correctly nini Sep 2017 #77
Pic... WhoWoodaKnew Sep 2017 #43
Degrees from Charles Manson spike jones Sep 2017 #44
She's been in prison for almost 50 years. She'll never murder again. Set her free. argyl Sep 2017 #50
He'll defer to the parole board. Which he shouldn't do, IMO. She should die in prison. nt Honeycombe8 Sep 2017 #51
Try explaining this to the Pennsylvania inmate........ mrmpa Sep 2017 #64
Parole boards exist for a reason. Gore1FL Sep 2017 #75
The degree of cold-blooded and heartless PoindexterOglethorpe Sep 2017 #82
Let me get this straight nini Sep 2017 #85
+++ Agree with you. Guess I'm vengeful and heartless also in this instance. nt iluvtennis Sep 2017 #88
Let me get this straight. PoindexterOglethorpe Sep 2017 #99
To be clear nini Sep 2017 #100
LVH had nothing to do with the Tate murders obamanut2012 Sep 2017 #108
She was present at the Tate murders and watched all that go down nini Sep 2017 #114
Can you point that out in the law? ProgressiveValue Sep 2017 #94
You are right that in the eyes of the law PoindexterOglethorpe Sep 2017 #103
Still a consideration treestar Sep 2017 #111
I am all for rehabilitation and parole but not in this case. This was a crime(s) of crazy chelsea0011 Sep 2017 #90
Exactly my view nini Sep 2017 #115
There is something seriously wrong with the make up of a person Jarqui Sep 2017 #92
good record of behavior in prison, IMO she has earned parole. Sunlei Sep 2017 #93
Fuck her SHRED Sep 2017 #104
Thanks for that link nini Sep 2017 #116
Post removed Post removed Sep 2017 #125
They should let her out treestar Sep 2017 #105
"Thanks for subnmitting your resume, Ms. Van Houten..." brooklynite Sep 2017 #112
120 days? Turbineguy Sep 2017 #118
The Quality of Mercy is not strained... maxsolomon Sep 2017 #122
I hope he ellie Sep 2017 #124

still_one

(92,131 posts)
2. Governor Jerry Brown will be the one to decide whether she should be released from prison after 40
Wed Sep 6, 2017, 06:45 PM
Sep 2017

years. Brown rejected her release last year.

 

WinkyDink

(51,311 posts)
5. "It's time"? For a very sick and twisted murder, complete with post-mortem atrocities? Don't bother
Wed Sep 6, 2017, 06:50 PM
Sep 2017

with a reply. I'm cruel and heartless, and you're not. Got it.

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
9. Do we believe in justice and mercy...
Wed Sep 6, 2017, 06:57 PM
Sep 2017

or just punishment and revenge?

We call them our Department of Corrections. If we don't believe in correction, we should change the name.

 

7962

(11,841 posts)
15. Justice & mercy are not always interchangeable.
Wed Sep 6, 2017, 07:14 PM
Sep 2017

Hopefully Brown turns her down.
Send a message to all the other poor impressionables out there who might savagely murder someone to impress another

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
20. A message?
Wed Sep 6, 2017, 07:18 PM
Sep 2017

We imprison more people than any other country.

While punishment and revenge might be interchangeable, justice and mercy go hand in hand in an enlightened society.

Lucky Luciano

(11,253 posts)
28. Ok in order to reduce prison populations, let's release low level drug offenders...
Wed Sep 6, 2017, 07:48 PM
Sep 2017

...and keep cold blooded savage murderers locked up forever.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
30. I've got a better idea
Wed Sep 6, 2017, 08:09 PM
Sep 2017

How about we release all drug offenders who should never have been there in the first place. It would be a good start and really has nothing to do with violent offenders.

As far as the rest of the prison population goes, they should be locked up for exactly how long it benefits society and no longer. Other, more civilized countries have long abandoned the US's backwards ideas on capital punishment and indefinite incarceration.

mountain grammy

(26,619 posts)
49. Yes, this is true.
Wed Sep 6, 2017, 09:37 PM
Sep 2017

Keeping her in prison really serves no purpose, but we Americans love our revenge. Maybe cause we're such a Christian nation?

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
53. Possibly
Wed Sep 6, 2017, 10:03 PM
Sep 2017

For whatever reason Americans seem to always collectively think there's always a simple solution to complicated problems, which explains why DT is so popular.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
56. The purpose of prison is not just to protect society. It's for punishment.
Wed Sep 6, 2017, 10:19 PM
Sep 2017

I know that these days there is this view that punishment should go unserved, if someone says "oopsies!" But a life sentence for an intentional, senseless, cruel murder of an innocent person is a just punishment, IMO. Punishment. That's why she's where she is. Justice. Justice for society, to punish a criminal for doing the unthinkable to an innocent person.

Let's not forget this wasn't a killing in defense, or out of passion, or accidental. She wasn't even assigned by Manson to be involved. She ASKED to be involved in the murders. Then she giggled about it on the witness stand.

This was no ordinary person who did something bizarre because of drugs. She's where she should be.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
66. The purpose of prison is just to protect society
Wed Sep 6, 2017, 11:25 PM
Sep 2017

Punishment is a means to that end, but should never be mistaken for the only solution. Punishment should end when it ceases to serve to protect society. It really is just that simple. Anything else is counterproductive.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
69. Actually, no. The purposes of prison include accountability for a crime.
Wed Sep 6, 2017, 11:32 PM
Sep 2017

Even if someone kills another person out of revenge, that person goes to prison, even though the killer won't be killing anyone else. He goes to prison to be accountable for his crime. For justice for the victim.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
73. Accountability protects society
Wed Sep 6, 2017, 11:41 PM
Sep 2017

Which still goes back to the reason why we have prisons is to protect society. It's just that simple.

 

7962

(11,841 posts)
91. The prison population has nothing to do with releasing murderers.
Thu Sep 7, 2017, 07:16 AM
Sep 2017

Plenty of deserving people can be released to lighten the population.
SHE isnt one of them. She's a violent killer and would be made a star by the still-deluded followers of Manson. yes, they're out there & easy to find.
She shouldve been given the needle and we wouldnt be having this discussion. Much deserved.

USALiberal

(10,877 posts)
33. Yea, crazy people evaluate parole periods and jail time when deciding to murder someone. FFS! n/t
Wed Sep 6, 2017, 08:20 PM
Sep 2017

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
55. It's called punishment and justice for a reason. There's no correcting what she did.
Wed Sep 6, 2017, 10:11 PM
Sep 2017

She's a few years older than I am. I was familiar with the drug scene in those days, although I was very young. No one...NO ONE...who is a half decent, halfway normal person would ever participate in what she participated in, no matter the drugs involved, no matter a guru like guy, no matter what.

She didn't kill someone in defense, or because of mistaken identity, or by accident. What she did was calculated, brutal, caused Mrs. Labianca extreme suffering, and was evil.

She already got to spend years in prison instead of being executed. She needs to fulfill her punishment.

duhneece

(4,112 posts)
71. What we now know about brain development and the lack of consequential ...
Wed Sep 6, 2017, 11:39 PM
Sep 2017

decision making until closer to 25 makes me believe that it is possible she has been 'corrected' and is no longer a threat to my life, so that keeping her locked up like a dangerous animal is now revenge, not community reconciliation. I'm with you, yallerdawg.

BigDemVoter

(4,149 posts)
63. I agree.
Wed Sep 6, 2017, 10:51 PM
Sep 2017

She has already give her entire life up for this, and she really should have. At this point, it's like beating a dead horse--

Warpy

(111,245 posts)
34. She's 68. Her term was life WITH the possibility of parole, not life without parole
Wed Sep 6, 2017, 08:21 PM
Sep 2017

She is extremely unlikely to turn to crime at this stage. She is not a threat to anyone any longer.

It was determined at her trial that between her youth and her drug addled state, she had sharply diminished capacity to make decisions. Unfortunately, there was also a media circus that pointed out that a manslaughter conviction with time served could put her on the street within a year and that is the main reason for the first degree murder conviction.

Whether she lives her life in prison or in a halfway house (the likeliest option), the people Manson ordered killed are not going to come back. She's spent 49 years trying to atone for being a follower. That's a life. It's enough.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
95. Actually I think she got the death penalty
Thu Sep 7, 2017, 09:46 AM
Sep 2017

which was commuted to life when the supreme court had decided the DP violated the 8th amendment.

Warpy

(111,245 posts)
102. She also had more than one trial
Thu Sep 7, 2017, 12:05 PM
Sep 2017

since other witnesses came forward to say which drugs she'd been given before she was taken to the La Bianca house and what threats she was under if she didn't comply with what others ordered her to do.

Her whole situation was beyond sad and she's been a model prisoner for 49 years. She's given her life. It's enough.

Midnight Writer

(21,745 posts)
78. Yeah, when you hang a pregnant woman from the ceiling and cut the child out of her body, just fer
Thu Sep 7, 2017, 01:06 AM
Sep 2017

shits and giggles, that should be your last chance at living among the rest of us. Forever.

Midnight Writer

(21,745 posts)
83. You are right. She had been dragged around by the noose around her neck, her breast was removed,
Thu Sep 7, 2017, 01:22 AM
Sep 2017

and her stomach slashed through and the baby killed. Sorry for my previous misstatement.

I get a little tetchy about these things.



























 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
96. No - she wasn't there for the Tate murders
Thu Sep 7, 2017, 09:49 AM
Sep 2017

but she still got the death penalty for the LaBianca (I think that was the name, apologies if not) murders. She already got a break when they commuted her sentence to life.

Warpy

(111,245 posts)
87. first, she wasn't there
Thu Sep 7, 2017, 01:54 AM
Sep 2017

Second, it didn't happen that way. Looks like you've got some reading to do.

nini

(16,672 posts)
86. Looks like people dont care how absolutely heinous those murders were
Thu Sep 7, 2017, 01:54 AM
Sep 2017

I remember all that happening. It stii creeps me out.

That and Richard Ramirez night stalker stuff were not routine run of the mill killings. These are dangerous people.

ripcord

(5,338 posts)
7. The goal of the Manson family was to start a race war
Wed Sep 6, 2017, 06:53 PM
Sep 2017

Pardon me if my sympathy meter isn't registering.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
39. Calling it sympathy is a wingnut talking point and intellectually bankrupt
Wed Sep 6, 2017, 08:34 PM
Sep 2017

It's also commonly used in half-fast strawman pro-DP "logic".

Sympathy has nothing to do with it, but ironically emotional arguments have pretty much everything to do with those who support the DP and indefinite incarceration as they have little to no hard evidence to cite.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
58. He said he wanted to start a race war. But seems like jealousy & revenge were part of it.
Wed Sep 6, 2017, 10:24 PM
Sep 2017

Several of the people killed had connections to people he had known in connection w/his attempt to break into the music scene (he'd failed at getting into the music scene).

dawn frenzy adams

(429 posts)
8. I don't know. But...
Wed Sep 6, 2017, 06:56 PM
Sep 2017

Whether it's a religious cult or whatever, they typically cannot function without the exploitation of women and children. I think Van Houten is a warning to young women who fall prey to the likes of Manson. Perhaps, if she is freed she could tour schools and colleges.

 

7962

(11,841 posts)
17. These days, the opposite would probably happen.
Wed Sep 6, 2017, 07:16 PM
Sep 2017

she'd become a star to the twisted idiots out there. There are still PLENTY of people who think Manson is cool. Only a few years ago a woman was going to marry him.

FLPanhandle

(7,107 posts)
10. This is why I still support the Death Penalty
Wed Sep 6, 2017, 06:59 PM
Sep 2017

People say replace it with "Life in Prison", which many of us could get behind, but then they move the goal posts to "Oh, they have been in prison long enough, let them out".

 

7962

(11,841 posts)
18. And thats exactly what is already starting to happen;
Wed Sep 6, 2017, 07:18 PM
Sep 2017

"oh, he/she is 74 now and no threat to society" or whatever other excuse. Death within a year for people like her. guilty with ZERO DOUBT. Only those cases. ZERO DOUBT.

BigmanPigman

(51,584 posts)
19. I would support the death penalty for Manson
Wed Sep 6, 2017, 07:18 PM
Sep 2017

but he actually WANTS that. He has said so many times over the years. He has spent 75% of his life in prison. The death penalty is only useful for those who do not want it. Many criminals would rather die than spend life in jail so for them life in jail is a better punishment.

 

ProgressiveValue

(130 posts)
46. What happens when they catch on to your plan?
Wed Sep 6, 2017, 09:09 PM
Sep 2017

"So if I say I'd rather have death, they'll lock me up for life. Fine, I'll say I'm scared to death of the death penalty and would rather have life, that way they'll think they are punishing me when they give me what I secretly really want; the death penalty."

BigmanPigman

(51,584 posts)
48. That is what happened to one of those female murderers.
Wed Sep 6, 2017, 09:16 PM
Sep 2017

I think it was that lady that murdered her boyfriend while he was showering. At first she said she would rather have death then she changed her mind when they took her seriously.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
32. Meanwhile Norway did away with both with far greater success
Wed Sep 6, 2017, 08:16 PM
Sep 2017

While the DP and life in prison might help you sleep better at night, it's counterproductive to the betterment of society.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
59. Norway is a tiny country with a low crime rate. Very different.
Wed Sep 6, 2017, 10:33 PM
Sep 2017

I wonder how understanding they'd be, if they had repeat offenders roaming the streets at night to kill innocent people brutally, and make them suffer first, just for funsies? That's what we have.

And the leading cause of death of pregnant women being murder.

And one serial murder after another...where men spend decades hunting women down like animals, enjoying the hunt, the end game being the kill and the saving of a souvenir. Maybe even posing their bodies for whoever finds them.

Or college guys who rape the girl in their group because she got drunk and can't resist. And then videotape it and put it on the internet. Fun!

No...I think our country is a little different from Norway. Compared to the U.S., murder in Norway is practically nonexistent.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
65. Kinda like saying the answer to a concussion problem is to get bigger bats
Wed Sep 6, 2017, 11:15 PM
Sep 2017

The reason Norway has a low crime rate is because they have been taking positive steps for decades to address the underlying causes of crime rather than just focusing on the symptoms in hopes that somehow the forces of cause and effect will somehow reconcile by really wishing it would.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
68. No. It's because it's a tiny country w/o a big crime problem.
Wed Sep 6, 2017, 11:30 PM
Sep 2017

Norway didn't used to have a big crime problem that they took care of. It has NEVER had a big crime problem.

Its history is very different from America's. Its size is very different, too. Its crime rate and kinds of crimes are different, as well.


customerserviceguy

(25,183 posts)
67. Norway, where Anders Behring Breivik
Wed Sep 6, 2017, 11:28 PM
Sep 2017

killed off dozens of young people who would have been that country's progressive leadership of tomorrow? And he only got 21 years in the slammer?

They should slowly torture him to death, but Norway's way too weenified for that.

customerserviceguy

(25,183 posts)
98. I was being facetious
Thu Sep 7, 2017, 11:34 AM
Sep 2017

But somewhere between ISIS and what Norway did in this case is a happy medium out there.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
101. Agree
Thu Sep 7, 2017, 12:03 PM
Sep 2017

Live without parole qualifies because that slime has no business breathing free air again. Neither does Van Houton for that matter.

 

7962

(11,841 posts)
121. I wouldnt make US law based on what other countries do or dont do.
Thu Sep 7, 2017, 03:20 PM
Sep 2017

The US is a fairly unique country. For whatever reason, you dont see savage murders such as this very often in other civilized countries.

Xolodno

(6,390 posts)
84. Death is too dignified for monsters.
Thu Sep 7, 2017, 01:39 AM
Sep 2017

Life without the possibility of Parole should be just that. Lock them up and throw away the key. I don't care if they are 100+ years old in prison, too frail to whack someone with their cane let alone kill someone...Keep them locked up, let them know they could have lived 100+ years in freedom, a productive life, family, etc. They took the opportunity for someone else away, their opportunity should also be taken away.

Can they be forgiven? Sure. But, that doesn't mean you should be released. If anything, speak out, write, etc. against the deeds done. Tell people, you follow my path, this is where you end up.

Jake Stern

(3,145 posts)
11. It's purely political.
Wed Sep 6, 2017, 07:03 PM
Sep 2017

Brown has let some nasty bastards go free so any crap he'll invariably utter to justify keeping Van Houten in prison will ring hollow;

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/1400-lifers-released-from-california-prisons-in-last-3-years/

Ernest Morgan on the other hand, is a lifer Brown did let free.

Morgan, a San Francisco man convicted of the shotgun slaying of his 14-year-old stepsister burglarizing the family home, was turned down for parole five times before the board granted him parole, only to be overruled by Schwarzenegger.

Schwarzenegger wrote that Morgan posed "a current, unreasonable risk to public safety." And he noted that Morgan had at one point claimed that the shotgun had gone off accidentally, although he later acknowledged his guilt to the parole board.

madaboutharry

(40,207 posts)
14. She has been in prison for nearly 50 years.
Wed Sep 6, 2017, 07:06 PM
Sep 2017

I don't see how she is a threat to society. She has been a model prisoner and has consistently expressed deep remorse and horror for her actions. She's 68 years old now. There comes a point when incarceration becomes political rather punishment.

MFM008

(19,804 posts)
16. Only she should get parole.
Wed Sep 6, 2017, 07:14 PM
Sep 2017

It's been 50 years.
Labianca was already dead when she
Mutilated the body.
If OJ can get out. Let her out.
The rest forget about. ..

MFM008

(19,804 posts)
117. I know
Thu Sep 7, 2017, 01:31 PM
Sep 2017

Heck everyone knows.
But we also know he did it regardless of aquital.
Just because someone in a jury may not understand DNA doesn't mean it lies....
Other offenders would have gotten less time
But it was the only chance they had to make him do time.

PatrickforO

(14,570 posts)
24. Well, she's 67 and has made no contribution to Social Security.
Wed Sep 6, 2017, 07:41 PM
Sep 2017

Therefore, if actually paroled, she will end up homeless and living under a bridge because it will literally be impossible for a Manson follower who is almost 70 to get work. Release her now and the 48 years she's spent in prison will seem like paradise compared to the living hell she'll have on the outside. Hunger. Disease. Constant dirt. Exposure to elements. Physical danger.

Was 48 years in prison punishment enough? Because Van Hauten will now have absolutely nothing on the outside, unless she has family.

Just saying.

Fucking Manson. That piece of shit.

 

janterry

(4,429 posts)
26. No, she won't
Wed Sep 6, 2017, 07:44 PM
Sep 2017

she submitted an appropriate release plan to the board (everyone who wants parole does)

FLPanhandle

(7,107 posts)
31. She could make good money on the speaker curcuit
Wed Sep 6, 2017, 08:14 PM
Sep 2017

and books, writings, media, TV interviews.

I think she will profit nicely for her crimes.

PatrickforO

(14,570 posts)
35. Hmm. I guess I'm a bleeding heart.
Wed Sep 6, 2017, 08:21 PM
Sep 2017

Van Houten was barely an adult when she fell in with Manson and Tex or whatever the hell his name was. She got brainwashed, and participated in something that killed innocent people, including a pregnant woman, and that ruined her life and the lives of the rest of the people Manson brainwashed.

I never understood why Manson and that Tex guy, as well as some of the women weren't executed. I know as 'good' Dems, we're supposed to be against the death penalty, but you know what? The mastermind who was trying to start a race war and incited the murders deserves to hang high.

But not, I think, Van Houten. Not after serving 47 years in prison.

45. They did get the death penalty in 1971, but the US Supreme Court ruled the death penalty
Wed Sep 6, 2017, 09:01 PM
Sep 2017

(as it was then administered) unconstitutional in 1972 which caused everyone on death row in America to have their sentences reduced to life imprisonment. (The death penalty was later allowed by the Supreme Court in 1976).

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
62. I remember those days, though I was young. NO ONE who was remotely normal...
Wed Sep 6, 2017, 10:45 PM
Sep 2017

and not evil would have done what she did.

Manson did not assign her to the murders. She asked to be involved in them. She was 19. Young, but an adult. I knew a lot of people messed up on drugs. NO ONE would have done what she did, no matter what.

She was evil. You have to have that in you, in order to do what she did. Mrs. Labianca was stabbed 47 times and certainly suffered, in great fear, before she died. Houton giggled about Mrs. Labianca on the witness stand.

Houton was not some innocent wayward girl who got in with a bad crowd and was influenced. No. I did drugs, was naive, messed around with some bad people...NO WAY would even I, who could be influenced, would ever have participated in cruelty toward a person, much less murder.

She's evil and is where she should be. In her punishment cell. For life.

As for her financial status, her family may take care of her. I believe they stayed in contact with her. The prison system may also have some program. Then there's Medicaid to provide health care (such as it is). If she can live somewhere free, by virtue of her family, get free healthcare, then all she'd need is a menial job to get by.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
110. I don't think any of us can say
Thu Sep 7, 2017, 12:44 PM
Sep 2017

there is no way we would not have done it. It was the 60s. We don't know if we would have fallen in with the Manson crowd, or what we would have done.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
123. Yes, I can. I KNOW for a fact that I would never ever NEVER EVER harm or kill anyone...
Thu Sep 7, 2017, 08:18 PM
Sep 2017

I don't care if I was drunk or on drugs. I don't have it in me to harm or kill anyone, except in self defense or the defense of others. Nothing, no drug, no drink, could put that evil thing in me.

That sort of thing is IN someone to begin with. Houton ASKED to be included in the murders. She wasn't even assigned to it. Then she giggled about it during trial.

No, she is not like most people. She's evil. She's not insane. She's evil. To know if someone is evil, you simply look at what they DO.

She should spend the rest of her life in prison, as punishment and justice for the murders, and for the cruelty and suffering that she caused Mrs. LaBianca. Mrs. LaBianca had a bag put on her head, neck tied to something with electrical cord, left to hear her husband scream as he was stabbed to death, and then Mrs. LaBianca was stabbed 47 times, as she slowly died.

I wouldn't do that to a pig, much less a person. She's evil.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
109. She could do all that from jail
Thu Sep 7, 2017, 12:32 PM
Sep 2017

In fact I have seen interviews of her.

She could have written books already. Weren't there some laws passed that they can't benefit?

JenniferJuniper

(4,510 posts)
42. She'll be fine. Books, speaking engagements but
Wed Sep 6, 2017, 08:40 PM
Sep 2017

I don't think Brown will ever let her out.

Personally, I think enough is enough. She committed a terrible crime when she was a teenager. She's an old lady now. Had she not been associated with Manson and committed the same crime she'd have been out by the early 1980's.

spike jones

(1,678 posts)
44. Degrees from Charles Manson
Wed Sep 6, 2017, 08:55 PM
Sep 2017

In 1970, I was hitch hiking from Lone Pine California to San Bernardino. I got a ride with a guy that said he was in the Inyo County jail for being drunk when Manson was caught. Manson was put in the cell next to his. They talked and the guy said that Manson seemed like a nice guy, very polite. That puts me two degrees of Manson, which, of course means nothing.
The origin of that conversation was that from 1969 to 1972, I looked exactly like Charles Manson.

mrmpa

(4,033 posts)
64. Try explaining this to the Pennsylvania inmate........
Wed Sep 6, 2017, 11:11 PM
Sep 2017

who when he was 17 was sentenced to life in prison, (in 1969)without the possibility of parole, for a murder, he says he did not do. This inmate appeared in front of a Judge (due to the supreme court's decision that juveniles could not be sentenced to life sentences).

The Judge resentenced him to 48 years to life. He has already spent 48 years in prison, he will be immediately up for parole, but since he will not admit his guilt, he will not be paroled.

WTF

Gore1FL

(21,127 posts)
75. Parole boards exist for a reason.
Thu Sep 7, 2017, 12:43 AM
Sep 2017

If we aren't going to trust their findings, we shouldn't have them.

PoindexterOglethorpe

(25,841 posts)
82. The degree of cold-blooded and heartless
Thu Sep 7, 2017, 01:17 AM
Sep 2017

vengefulness expressed here is a bit scary.

She was 19. She was not a full adult. She's been in prison 50 years. She's not remotely a danger to anyone.

nini

(16,672 posts)
85. Let me get this straight
Thu Sep 7, 2017, 01:51 AM
Sep 2017

Because i think someone who took part in murders one night, where a pregnant woman had her baby killed with a knife in utero , then the next night she stabbed someone 15 or so times isnt worthy of being let loose - I'm vengeful anld heartless?

Ok.

PoindexterOglethorpe

(25,841 posts)
99. Let me get this straight.
Thu Sep 7, 2017, 11:59 AM
Sep 2017

You don't believe anyone can ever reform. Or be forgiven for what they've done.

I believe in the possibility of redemption. I believe 50 years is long enough.

nini

(16,672 posts)
100. To be clear
Thu Sep 7, 2017, 12:02 PM
Sep 2017

I am not always against parole.. I believe most people should be let go before they even are.

Not in this case. You don't do that crap by mistake or because you're young. There's something deep seeded in there to partake in those types of crimes.

obamanut2012

(26,068 posts)
108. LVH had nothing to do with the Tate murders
Thu Sep 7, 2017, 12:31 PM
Sep 2017

And actually didn't kill anyone. She has served 50 years, much more than people who have committed similar crimes in CA, who serve an average of 18.75 years for a home invasion and single muredr, and there is no proof LVH even killed anyone.

She even lived a s a model citizen for several years between her trials.

nini

(16,672 posts)
114. She was present at the Tate murders and watched all that go down
Thu Sep 7, 2017, 01:06 PM
Sep 2017

She then decided that must have been fun and then took part in the LaBianca murders. Now normal people would have been completely freaked out at the Tate events and ran for the hills, yet she went back for more - then took part.

"Van Houten stalked into the house of Leno and Rosemary LaBianca and participated in Rosemary's murder, stabbing her approximately 16 times"
https://www.biography.com/people/leslie-van-houten-20900729


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leslie_Van_Houten

Snippet: Van Houten then held LaBianca down while Krenwinkel tried to stab her in the chest, but the blade bent on LaBianca's clavicle. Van Houten called for assistance from Watson, who entered the bedroom and stabbed Rosemary LaBianca several times. He then found Van Houten, handed her the knife, and told her to "do something" (since Manson had instructed Watson to make sure everyone actively participated). Van Houten stabbed Rosemary's lower back and buttocks over a dozen times. Van Houten later told Dianne Lake that she had stabbed someone who was already dead. The autopsy indicated that some of the 47 stab wounds Rosemary suffered had been inflicted post-mortem.[3][18][33]

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Whether LaBianca was already dead at that point does not dismiss the insanity of what she did and who can say really who gave the blows that actually killed her - she still did what she did. There is a fundamental mental problem with people who go to that level in crimes and that doesn't go away. There are just some things so vile I don't agree to parole on. She'll get out this time I'd guess and let's hope she proves me wrong.

 

ProgressiveValue

(130 posts)
94. Can you point that out in the law?
Thu Sep 7, 2017, 09:03 AM
Sep 2017

Where in the law is 19 not considered an adult? Also, I've never seen the legal term "full adult". The categories fall as a minor and adult, with adult being 18 or older. So where did you come up with this term of not a full adult and how does it carry any legal weight?

I very much dislike it when people start referring to suspects or victims in a case, depending on what side they fall on, as adults or children. Preteens suddenly become grown men and people in their 20s suddenly get referred to in terms of small children. Then those same people, in a different case, will suddenly reverse how they see those same age categories and the terms they use to describe them. All in order to frame a narrative.

PoindexterOglethorpe

(25,841 posts)
103. You are right that in the eyes of the law
Thu Sep 7, 2017, 12:09 PM
Sep 2017

anyone over 18 is an adult. But research shows that brains don't mature until age 25 or so. Anyone who has raised children to adulthood knows that.

Of course, this country cheerfully sentences juveniles to life in prison without parole, so clearly vengefulness is a strong part of our national personality.

I come down on the side of mercy. Oddly enough, I am not a Christian or a believer of any kind. I wonder how many here consider themselves Christians and are stating that this woman should die in prison. I don't see any aspect of mercy there.

chelsea0011

(10,115 posts)
90. I am all for rehabilitation and parole but not in this case. This was a crime(s) of crazy
Thu Sep 7, 2017, 05:51 AM
Sep 2017

brutality. And as I read about her paroles hearings, it has always felt like she is never giving the full story to her involvement. However, I am not completely against being confines in a different prison and given some leeway to do community work during the day outside the prison under strict supervision.

Jarqui

(10,123 posts)
92. There is something seriously wrong with the make up of a person
Thu Sep 7, 2017, 07:41 AM
Sep 2017

who would assault a defenseless woman already wounded by a bayonet and 33 other stabbings by stabbing her 14 more times in the back.

She wasn't picked or forced to do the Labianca killings - she asked to go.

After her arrest, she defended Manson throughout much of the court action. She said she would have gone to jail for committing crimes even if she hadn't met Manson.

In my opinion, she deserves the same compassion she gave Rosemary LaBianca: none.

Generally, I'm not a fan of the death penalty but Manson is someone so evil, I could easily make an exception.

 

SHRED

(28,136 posts)
104. Fuck her
Thu Sep 7, 2017, 12:13 PM
Sep 2017

She deserves no freedom...ever.

Ms. Van Houten broke into the home of Leno & Rosemary LaBianca on August 10, 1969- after Charles Manson had gone into their home & tied the couple up. She placed a pillowcase over Mrs. LaBianca's head & tied it with a lamp chord. She held Mrs. LaBianca down so Patricia Krenwinkel could stab her. When the knife bent stabbing Mrs. LaBianca in the collar bone, Ms. Van Houten held Mrs. LaBianca down so Tex Watson could come in & stab her. Ms. Van Houten then stabbed Mrs. LaBianca in the lower back several times. Rosemary LaBianca was stabbed a total of 41 times. Words were written in blood on two walls & a refrigerator door. Ms. Van Houten then took a shower, stole one of Rosemary LaBianca's dresses to wear, & ate food from the victims' refrigerator before leaving.


https://www.change.org/p/ask-gov-brown-to-keep-charles-manson-cult-killer-leslie-van-houten-from-being-paroled

Response to SHRED (Reply #104)

brooklynite

(94,501 posts)
112. "Thanks for subnmitting your resume, Ms. Van Houten..."
Thu Sep 7, 2017, 12:49 PM
Sep 2017

"Could you briefly summarize your adult work life?"

Turbineguy

(37,317 posts)
118. 120 days?
Thu Sep 7, 2017, 01:50 PM
Sep 2017

By that time the trump administration will have appointed her "Secretary in charge of being nice to people".

maxsolomon

(33,310 posts)
122. The Quality of Mercy is not strained...
Thu Sep 7, 2017, 05:38 PM
Sep 2017

The quality of mercy is not strained.
It droppeth as the gentle rain from heaven
Upon the place beneath. It is twice blest:
It blesseth him that gives and him that takes.
Tis mightiest in the mightiest; it becomes
The throned monarch better than his crown.
His scepter shows the force of temporal power,
The attribute to awe and majesty,
Wherein doth sit the dread and fear of kings.
But mercy is above this sceptered sway;
It is enthroned in the hearts of kings;
It is an attribute of God himself;
And earthly power doth then show like God's
When mercy seasons justice.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Charles Manson follower L...