Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,501 posts)
Thu Sep 7, 2017, 04:38 PM Sep 2017

Gingrich or Santorum as speaker? House conservatives plot mischief for the fall

Source: Washington Post

Several influential House conservatives are privately plotting ways to use the legislative calendar this fall to push their hard-line agenda — including quiet discussions about possibly mounting a leadership challenge to House Speaker Paul D. Ryan.

The group has gone so far as to float the idea of recruiting former House speaker Newt Gingrich or former Pennsylvania senator Rick Santorum as potential replacements for Ryan (R-Wis.) should there be a rebellion. The Constitution does not require that an elected member of the House serve as speaker.

While the chances that a non-House member could mount a credible threat to Ryan are exceedingly slim, the fact the group has even toyed with the idea underscores their desire to create trouble for GOP leaders if they believe their demands are not being addressed.

Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/gingrich-or-santorum-as-speaker-house-conservatives-plot-mischief-for-the-fall/2017/09/07/8df6ab60-9316-11e7-aace-04b862b2b3f3_story.html

32 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Gingrich or Santorum as speaker? House conservatives plot mischief for the fall (Original Post) brooklynite Sep 2017 OP
Chuckle n/t hibbing Sep 2017 #1
The return of Gingrich? procon Sep 2017 #2
No no no! FakeNoose Sep 2017 #21
It seems to me the SOB would have to be elected to Congress in 2018 Warpy Sep 2017 #26
Apparently, the Constitution allows for this. Dave Starsky Sep 2017 #31
You can bet Newt hasn't abandoned it, yet. sofa king Sep 2017 #32
The fact that Santorum is even in the conversation tells you everything you need to know about them underpants Sep 2017 #3
Really. SergeStorms Sep 2017 #14
Slick Rick is my guy bucolic_frolic Sep 2017 #4
putting him in as a candidate would certainly create a....... lastlib Sep 2017 #24
Doesn't that mean the leftynyc Sep 2017 #5
You're right zipplewrath Sep 2017 #8
Of course the Speaker wouldn't get to vote on legislation if they weren't a member of Congress. PoliticAverse Sep 2017 #12
I didn't know that leftynyc Sep 2017 #13
Who's spreading the santorum, rumor? Historic NY Sep 2017 #6
It's spreading maxrandb Sep 2017 #11
This was mentioned on MSNBC last night BigmanPigman Sep 2017 #7
"House conservatives plot mischief for the FAIL" They_Live Sep 2017 #9
speaker frothy....we could have fun with this dembotoz Sep 2017 #10
Another GOP pipe-dream. SergeStorms Sep 2017 #15
We said that about Trump for president. Initech Sep 2017 #19
and the response of every GOP member when they try to get them to vote for something: TeamPooka Sep 2017 #16
It's the not fooled Sep 2017 #17
Conservatives think this is a joke. It isn't. Initech Sep 2017 #18
Just a bunch of overgrown frat boys Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Sep 2017 #20
Is this serious? Sgent Sep 2017 #22
Freedumb Caucus + Steve Bannon are the brilliant minds behind this emulatorloo Sep 2017 #29
As long as Nancy Pelosi is speaker in 2019, and President shortly after, I couldn't care less... NNadir Sep 2017 #23
Isn't Gingrich going to Rome w/ his wife? irisblue Sep 2017 #25
I'm sure he can find some companionship if they end up separated... brooklynite Sep 2017 #28
. thx for that thought irisblue Sep 2017 #30
Good to hear President Bannon is guiding this effort emulatorloo Sep 2017 #27

procon

(15,805 posts)
2. The return of Gingrich?
Thu Sep 7, 2017, 04:46 PM
Sep 2017

Republicans love him, and his past ethics charges would be laughed off just like Trumps. He's very much stamped from the same mold as Trump.

Warpy

(111,243 posts)
26. It seems to me the SOB would have to be elected to Congress in 2018
Thu Sep 7, 2017, 11:40 PM
Sep 2017

and I honestly don't see that happening. The GOP in there now is not going to go quietly.

Santorum, ditto, plus he'd have to carpetbag off to a new district. His name is mud in his old one.

Dave Starsky

(5,914 posts)
31. Apparently, the Constitution allows for this.
Fri Sep 8, 2017, 08:09 AM
Sep 2017

Not that it matters. Republicans abandoned that hoary old document long ago. They're just making shit up as they go along now.

sofa king

(10,857 posts)
32. You can bet Newt hasn't abandoned it, yet.
Fri Sep 8, 2017, 08:32 AM
Sep 2017

Any technicality that puts him two heartbeats away from the Presidency is A-OK with him.

underpants

(182,766 posts)
3. The fact that Santorum is even in the conversation tells you everything you need to know about them
Thu Sep 7, 2017, 04:51 PM
Sep 2017

Santorum

SergeStorms

(19,193 posts)
14. Really.
Thu Sep 7, 2017, 07:20 PM
Sep 2017

The biggest tool (figuratively, not literally) on the planet. I don't think most Republicans like the asshole, do they?

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
5. Doesn't that mean the
Thu Sep 7, 2017, 04:57 PM
Sep 2017

speaker would not get a vote? They weren't elected, don't represent anyone so I would guess not being allowed a vote would follow. Anyone know?

zipplewrath

(16,646 posts)
8. You're right
Thu Sep 7, 2017, 05:21 PM
Sep 2017

Technically, it wouldn't stop them. But it's about as likely as electing a Rabbi as Pope. Too many people who have to vote for them, want the job themselves. Never happen.

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
12. Of course the Speaker wouldn't get to vote on legislation if they weren't a member of Congress.
Thu Sep 7, 2017, 06:24 PM
Sep 2017

Note that by tradition the Speaker usually doesn't cast a vote on legislation anyway (it only matters of course
if their vote is needed to break a tie).

maxrandb

(15,320 posts)
11. It's spreading
Thu Sep 7, 2017, 05:34 PM
Sep 2017

Like a "frothy mix of anal secretions, semen and bile".

I think Srotorum is responsible for the rumors. He's always had delusions of adequacy.

BigmanPigman

(51,584 posts)
7. This was mentioned on MSNBC last night
Thu Sep 7, 2017, 05:13 PM
Sep 2017

and it sounded pretty unrealistic but I guess you shouldn't put anything past the GOP bastards when they want something. Maybe GOP infighting will benefit Dems as well as the GOP being pissed at 45 for meeting and dealing with Schumer and Pelosi.

TeamPooka

(24,221 posts)
16. and the response of every GOP member when they try to get them to vote for something:
Thu Sep 7, 2017, 07:24 PM
Sep 2017

"Sure, YOU don't have to vote for it!"

Sgent

(5,857 posts)
22. Is this serious?
Thu Sep 7, 2017, 10:56 PM
Sep 2017

I know its Rush's wet dream, but have they lost their fucking minds? I can't even see the freedom caucus agreeing on this, much less 218 house members.

Please house freedom caucus, go off the deep end and watch what happens... The D's will join the Tuesday Group and put one of them in as speaker.

emulatorloo

(44,113 posts)
29. Freedumb Caucus + Steve Bannon are the brilliant minds behind this
Thu Sep 7, 2017, 11:43 PM
Sep 2017

What could possibly go wrong, lol

NNadir

(33,512 posts)
23. As long as Nancy Pelosi is speaker in 2019, and President shortly after, I couldn't care less...
Thu Sep 7, 2017, 11:10 PM
Sep 2017

...what these psycho traitorous ass hats do.

irisblue

(32,967 posts)
25. Isn't Gingrich going to Rome w/ his wife?
Thu Sep 7, 2017, 11:38 PM
Sep 2017

Callista, is up for the Ambassador to the Holy See. Which is all kinds of on its own. Be very surprising if she left that known adulterer behind in DC.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Gingrich or Santorum as s...