Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Mon Sep 11, 2017, 04:20 PM Sep 2017

Supreme Court temporarily lifts restrictions on Trump travel ban

Source: The Hill




BY LYDIA WHEELER - 09/11/17 02:26 PM EDT

The Supreme Court on Monday granted the Trump administration's request to temporarily lift restrictions on the president's travel ban.

In a one-page order signed by Justice Anthony Kennedy, the court temporarily blocked the part of last week's 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that barred the government from prohibiting refugees that have formal assurances from resettlement agencies or are in the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program from entering the U.S.

Kennedy said that part of the decision is stayed pending the receipt of a response from the state of Hawaii. That response that is due by noon on Tuesday.

The Supreme Court's decision came less than two hours after Acting Solicitor General Jeffrey Wall filed a request for a stay.

Read more: http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/350097-supreme-court-temporarily-blocks-appeals-court-ruling-that-limits

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court temporarily lifts restrictions on Trump travel ban (Original Post) DonViejo Sep 2017 OP
Wasn't the travel ban supposed to have been for just 90 days? George II Sep 2017 #1
That's what I thought too. BigmanPigman Sep 2017 #2
Yes, so the govt could evaluate and modify vetting and security procedures. JustABozoOnThisBus Sep 2017 #6
Keep the Muslims and ban the Dominionists and white supremacists instead. nt procon Sep 2017 #3
Has this Court lost its mind? nt SylviaD Sep 2017 #4
Well elections have consequences when Bernie and Hillary supporters were going at each leon8822 Sep 2017 #5

JustABozoOnThisBus

(23,339 posts)
6. Yes, so the govt could evaluate and modify vetting and security procedures.
Tue Sep 12, 2017, 06:23 AM
Sep 2017

Apparently, without the ban in place, they were administratively paralyzed.

They can't walk and chew gum.

 

leon8822

(82 posts)
5. Well elections have consequences when Bernie and Hillary supporters were going at each
Tue Sep 12, 2017, 06:02 AM
Sep 2017

During the Presidential election smart people keep saying you have to support the democratic nominee regardless who wins the primary because the Supreme Court is the most important thing for the next President.Some people didn't listen instead voted 3rd party or didn't vote at all and this is going to bite us in the ass with some of these rulings.Especially with the new guy on the court

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court temporarily...