Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riversedge

(70,197 posts)
Tue Sep 26, 2017, 07:38 PM Sep 2017

EPA chief getting his own $25,000 sound-proof booth

Source: cnn



Updated 6:00 PM ET, Tue September 26, 2017
EPA moving agents to provide 24/7 security

JUST WATCHED



Washington (CNN)Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt is known for mandating note-free meetings, he's the only administrator to have requested his 24/7 own security detail and now he's about to have his own sound-proof booth.
................................

The booth, also known as a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF), will be a customized model for Pruitt to conduct meetings, calls and other lines of communication undisturbed, according to the Post.
......................................

"They had a lot of modifications," said Steve Snider, an acoustic sales consultant with the company, told the Post. "Their main goal was they wanted essentially a secure phone booth that couldn't be breached from a data point of view or from someone standing outside eavesdropping."

The EPA did not respond to multiple requests for comment from CNN.

Pruitt has taken several unusual steps regarding security and meetings at EPA. It's been reported that the administrator, who prefers to interact with just the political appointees inside the agency, has banned note-taking during meetings and also recently requested funds for round-the-clock bodyguards.

..............................................


Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2017/09/26/politics/pruitt-sound-proof-booth/?iid=ob_lockedrail_longstory_pool



24/7 bodyguards, sound proof rooms, no note taking!! What is this?? This is the EPA for christs sake!



Also see this DU link:

https://www.democraticunderground.com/10141875357






















The OP is serious but this is funny:




21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
EPA chief getting his own $25,000 sound-proof booth (Original Post) riversedge Sep 2017 OP
So which coal baron gets to try it out first? ThoughtCriminal Sep 2017 #1
Yep. LudwigPastorius Sep 2017 #8
"Cone of Silence" Lindsay Sep 2017 #2
Yeah, "cone of silence" was my first thought DeminPennswoods Sep 2017 #4
should tar and feather the fuck...... dhill926 Sep 2017 #3
this administration believes KT2000 Sep 2017 #5
Not only does this have obvious implications about the kind of business they want to do... Akoto Sep 2017 #6
Gee I wonder what could be so secret? Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Sep 2017 #7
Yes, Delphinus Sep 2017 #15
Nut Job weissmam Sep 2017 #9
LOCK HIM UP! He has to be doing something illegal mdbl Sep 2017 #10
Oh, yeah not fooled Sep 2017 #12
Does he think no one will They_Live Sep 2017 #11
Sounds like they are trying to prevent anything incriminating from being uncovered by a cstanleytech Sep 2017 #13
The EPA is where they will make $$$ oxbow Sep 2017 #14
Pruitt wants no evidence for when he repeatedly sells Americans' birthrights: clean land, air, water Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2017 #16
He will leave Gov a very rich man IMHO riversedge Sep 2017 #17
Seems legit. Beartracks Sep 2017 #18
As I understand it melm00se Sep 2017 #19
Question, will it also be air tight? Hugin Sep 2017 #20
lmao at the "Cone of Silence" references area51 Sep 2017 #21

ThoughtCriminal

(14,047 posts)
1. So which coal baron gets to try it out first?
Tue Sep 26, 2017, 07:42 PM
Sep 2017

Once in the cone of silence, Pruitt gets to explain that bribes are really not necessary, but...

LudwigPastorius

(9,137 posts)
8. Yep.
Tue Sep 26, 2017, 08:00 PM
Sep 2017

Since the CEOs seeking "regulatory relief" ran out of pallets of cash to be left across the street behind the dumpster at the Smithsonian, Pruitt has to give out the offshore account numbers under completely secure conditions.

Lindsay

(3,276 posts)
2. "Cone of Silence"
Tue Sep 26, 2017, 07:43 PM
Sep 2017

was the first thing I thought of when I read that.

(Which says more about my age than anything else, I guess.)

Akoto

(4,266 posts)
6. Not only does this have obvious implications about the kind of business they want to do...
Tue Sep 26, 2017, 07:56 PM
Sep 2017

It's ultimately a pointless waste of money. There isn't a security system in existence a smart person hasn't been able to defeat in some way.

They'll justify it, I'm sure, as a method of overcoming leakers they otherwise can't pin down.

Delphinus

(11,830 posts)
15. Yes,
Tue Sep 26, 2017, 09:24 PM
Sep 2017

it's the EPA for goodness sake - why should they need such tactics? Why not transparency? What and with whom will secret stuff be discussed? It really seems VERY odd.

not fooled

(5,801 posts)
12. Oh, yeah
Tue Sep 26, 2017, 08:35 PM
Sep 2017

Can you imagine if the EPA chief under President Obama had done this? The faux-bots would be screaming at the top of their lungs. Of course, pruitt's gotta hide what he's up to not only from the media but also from his own employees, at least the good ones that are still there.



They_Live

(3,231 posts)
11. Does he think no one will
Tue Sep 26, 2017, 08:17 PM
Sep 2017

notice the results of his secret conversations and meetings? You work for the people.

cstanleytech

(26,284 posts)
13. Sounds like they are trying to prevent anything incriminating from being uncovered by a
Tue Sep 26, 2017, 09:19 PM
Sep 2017

subpoena which notes from a meeting might contain thus the ban on said notes.

oxbow

(2,034 posts)
14. The EPA is where they will make $$$
Tue Sep 26, 2017, 09:23 PM
Sep 2017

Selling off environmental protections to the highest bidder. They're shameless..This should be illegal in an agency Set up to protect people.

melm00se

(4,991 posts)
19. As I understand it
Wed Sep 27, 2017, 10:42 AM
Sep 2017

SCIFs are used when discussing Sensitive Compartmented Information (SCI) which is
classified Secret or Top Secret information that is derived from intelligence sources, methods or
analytical processes.

I don't see this really applying to the EPA.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»EPA chief getting his own...