Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

highplainsdem

(49,045 posts)
Fri Oct 20, 2017, 09:17 PM Oct 2017

Exclusive: Pentagon Document Contradicts Trump's Gold Star Claims

Source: Roll Call

In the hours after President Donald Trump said on an Oct. 17 radio broadcast that he had contacted nearly every family that had lost a military servicemember this year, the White House was hustling to learn from the Pentagon the identities and contact information for those families, according to an internal Defense Department email.

The email exchange, which has not been previously reported, shows that senior White House aides were aware on the day the president made the statement that it was not accurate — but that they should try to make it accurate as soon as possible, given the gathering controversy.

Not only had the president not contacted virtually all the families of military personnel killed this year, the White House did not even have an up-to-date list of those who had been killed.

The exchange between the White House and the Defense secretary’s office occurred about 5 p.m. on Oct. 17. The White House asked the Pentagon for information about surviving family members of all servicemembers killed after Trump’s inauguration so that the president could be sure to contact all of them.

-snip-

Read more: http://www.rollcall.com/news/politics/after-trump-claim-white-house-still-lacked-casualty-list



Editing to add that I found this via a tweet frosm CNN's Andrew Kaczynski:




Man, what a grotesque thing for Trump to BS about. I've lost the ability to be shocked.

http://www.rollcall.com/news/politics/after-trump-claim-white-house-still-lacked-casualty-list
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Exclusive: Pentagon Document Contradicts Trump's Gold Star Claims (Original Post) highplainsdem Oct 2017 OP
It is a shame for us. leanforward Oct 2017 #1
Again, Corgigal Oct 2017 #2
Yeah......... SergeStorms Oct 2017 #3
The Republican draft dodger in chief is lying Achilleaze Oct 2017 #4
But they want to be upset about NFL players taking a knee... Dustlawyer Oct 2017 #8
"The email exchange ... " DK504 Oct 2017 #5
Trump makes the slime people look all shiny and good Angry Dragon Oct 2017 #6
What's it gonna take, America, to face up to the fact that he MUST be replaced. mpcamb Oct 2017 #7
He should just make a canned robocall. Leave a space where someone can speak the name of the dead. NBachers Oct 2017 #9
No need to get fancy with the name. He can just say "your guy." Demit Oct 2017 #13
I wouldn't trust him to hold my coat. rickford66 Oct 2017 #10
To put it simply jetwash Oct 2017 #12
How many lies, just around the issue of contacting familes, is this? jetwash Oct 2017 #11

leanforward

(1,077 posts)
1. It is a shame for us.
Fri Oct 20, 2017, 09:27 PM
Oct 2017

This fact alone, confirms that no one person in the white house confers with another agency. There HAS to be a desk or a person who keeps track of those KIAs.

The guy in the white house needs to go.

Corgigal

(9,291 posts)
2. Again,
Fri Oct 20, 2017, 09:27 PM
Oct 2017

I get pain from reading this stuff. Defense Sec. Mattis is the adult in the room? Hell, he barely sounds human.



SergeStorms

(19,204 posts)
3. Yeah.........
Fri Oct 20, 2017, 09:42 PM
Oct 2017

even when Trump picks from his stable of amazing, great, great Generals, it seems like he's picking the bottom of the barrel. Granted, these Generals are not career government servants, but it would seem they'd try not to emulate their Draft-Dodger-In-Chief and attempt to learn a little something about their position. And failing that, they might not think it their "duty" to lie like a $3 rug as their CIC constantly does.

It seems Trump will only pick ass-kissing toadies, whether it's Generals or civilians. That's his ONLY criteria: you must be willing to fall on any grenade, real or imagined, to save Trump's bacon.

Achilleaze

(15,543 posts)
4. The Republican draft dodger in chief is lying
Fri Oct 20, 2017, 09:45 PM
Oct 2017

About our sons and daughters in uniform. The Republicans are an absolute disgrace. These lies have got to stop.

NBachers

(17,149 posts)
9. He should just make a canned robocall. Leave a space where someone can speak the name of the dead.
Fri Oct 20, 2017, 11:47 PM
Oct 2017

Fill in the blank with the dead soldier's name; it can be done by someone imitating trump's voice. Punch in the number, hit the recording, done. Sounds like a fine job for "Empty Barrel" Kelly.

jetwash

(13 posts)
11. How many lies, just around the issue of contacting familes, is this?
Sat Oct 21, 2017, 12:36 AM
Oct 2017

Off the top of my head:

* Trump claiming previous Presidents (and Obama specifically) didn't call families of fallen soldiers, which started the whole thing.
* Trump claiming he never said that Sgt. Johnson "knew what he was in for, but I guess it still hurts" (paraphrasing).
* Trump claiming he had proof that he never said that.
* Trump claiming Rep. Wilson was no longer making the claim that he said that.
* Trump *again* claiming he never said it, even after Kelly admitted he did and tried to translate what Trump said to what he meant to say (or at least was supposed to say).
* Kelly claiming about Rep. Wilson's speech was about taking credit for getting funding for a new federal building.
* Trump claiming he had called "virtually all" of the families of soldiers killed during his term.

What am I missing? It seems like Sarah Huckabee Sanders should be in that list, but I'm not sure she flat-out lied. She mostly just says things that don't *quite* answer the question posed to her.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Exclusive: Pentagon Docum...