Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Mon Dec 4, 2017, 03:02 PM Dec 2017

Goldman Sachs doesn't think the Republican tax bill would be a big boost to the US economy

Source: Business Insider




Bob Bryan


Republicans have promised their tax bill would lead to a huge boost for economic growth.

Goldman Sachs' economic team estimated that the bill would give the US a small economic boost in 2018 and 2019.

"We note that the effect in 2020 and beyond looks minimal and could actually be slightly negative," the Goldman economists wrote.


In the lead up to the passage of the Republican tax bill in the Senate overnight on Saturday, GOP leaders boasted that the bill would be a huge boon for the US economy.

Goldman Sachs does not agree.

Alec Phillips and Blake Taylor, analysts on Goldman's US economic analysis team, say the Senate version of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) would provide a small short-term boost to growth. But that boost would quickly fade.

"We have increased our estimate of the growth effects of the legislation slightly, to around 0.3pp in 2018 and 2019," Phillips and Taylor said in a note to clients on Monday. "This reflects the slightly larger amount of tax cuts in the Senate plan following revisions, and our expectations regarding the eventual compromise."


Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/trump-tax-reform-bill-goldman-sachs-text-analysis-2017-12
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Goldman Sachs doesn't think the Republican tax bill would be a big boost to the US economy (Original Post) DonViejo Dec 2017 OP
Meanwhile, Goldman Sachs execs eagerly await their tax cuts dalton99a Dec 2017 #1
Evidently not, or they wouldn't be speaking out against it. yardwork Dec 2017 #9
It's not designed to help the economy not fooled Dec 2017 #2
And so do the vast majority of prominent economists. In fact, most people who itemize deductions still_one Dec 2017 #3
yeah, and almost all scientists agree getagrip_already Dec 2017 #4
So true still_one Dec 2017 #6
And that is because the tax cuts for the workers fall off. Egnever Dec 2017 #5
When they publicly oppose it and throw their support to the BigmanPigman Dec 2017 #7
If you have two kids and work McJobs nitpicker Dec 2017 #8

not fooled

(5,801 posts)
2. It's not designed to help the economy
Mon Dec 4, 2017, 03:10 PM
Dec 2017

It's designed to reward donors and destroy Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid.

still_one

(92,288 posts)
3. And so do the vast majority of prominent economists. In fact, most people who itemize deductions
Mon Dec 4, 2017, 03:17 PM
Dec 2017

today, will not realize any tax benefit, and very well might have a tax increased since the personal exemption is being eliminated

getagrip_already

(14,795 posts)
4. yeah, and almost all scientists agree
Mon Dec 4, 2017, 03:29 PM
Dec 2017

that global warming is the result of hman activity and is accelerating. But the trump team is about to eliminate NOAA in their proposed budget.

Don't like the analysis, get rid of the analyzers.

If you income is derived from a regular paycheck, you will pay more in taxes. But don't expect anyone to be around to document that.

BigmanPigman

(51,614 posts)
7. When they publicly oppose it and throw their support to the
Mon Dec 4, 2017, 04:59 PM
Dec 2017

Dems, it is all BS. Tom Steyer is using his own money and is now running anti Tax Scam commercials with his Impeachment ad campaign.

nitpicker

(7,153 posts)
8. If you have two kids and work McJobs
Tue Dec 5, 2017, 06:58 AM
Dec 2017

There is less pay in the paycheck. More taxes are taken out up front, and people won't get the CTC refund until next year.



Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Goldman Sachs doesn't thi...