Over 19 million California voter records leaked by Sacramento Bee, quickly held for ransom by hacker
Source: IBT UK
The Sacramento Bee accidentally leaked a database containing more than 19 million California voters' records online before it was promptly hijacked and locked down by opportunistic hackers for ransom. The local newspaper said in a statement that a firewall protecting the database was not restored by a third-party vendor during routine maintenance, leaving the records of 19,501,258 voters publicly exposed for two weeks.
The data, legally obtained by The Bee for reporting purposes, included voters' names, addresses, dates of birth, political affiliation and other voter details. A separate database that contained the names, home addresses, email addresses and phone numbers of 53,000 current and former Sacramento Bee subscribers who signed up for the paper prior to 2017 was also compromised.
Read more: https://amp.ibtimes.co.uk/over-19-million-california-voter-records-leaked-by-sacramento-bee-quickly-held-ransom-by-hackers-1660334?__twitter_impression=true
Link to tweet
bucolic_frolic
(43,352 posts)and the miscreants know what to do when they succeed at their deeds
Sounds like an organized bunch to me
yuiyoshida
(41,867 posts)have Russian accents?
Ivan is just John. And Efem is Jeffrey. And Natalia is Natalie. And Oksana is... Oksana. A fine ummmm... old... uhhh... Welsh name.
Historic NY
(37,454 posts)the expenses of repairing the damage.
ggmac0427
(38 posts)How is it possible that a newspaper LEGALLY has access to a database containing voter records?
What possible "reporting purposes" could there be that allow access to a full database?
PatSeg
(47,633 posts)I was a Sacramento Bee subscriber over a decade ago. I find this rather odd.
backtoblue
(11,346 posts)magicarpet
(14,181 posts)USA Election meddlers dream data cache,
* RNC
* Kris Kobach
* Cambridge Analytica
* Russian spy agencies
PSPS
(13,620 posts)sinkingfeeling
(51,479 posts)in the voters' records that they could be denied their right to vote? Like changing their affiliation or the spelling of their middle name or a number on their street address.
backtoblue
(11,346 posts)Stuart G
(38,449 posts)I wonder if the "third party vendor" had it's private information compromised.
Why is this not coming from a Sacramento source?....Why are we learning about this from the UK?
had to ask...........
olddad56
(5,732 posts)Akacia
(583 posts)how did the hackers hold the names etc. for ransom? Did they ask for money or what? This was not clear to me in the story. Pretty awful stuff having that kind of information in the wrong hands.