Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Sat Feb 24, 2018, 02:38 PM Feb 2018

Trump Weighs Red Flag Orders to Take Guns Away Quickly

Source: Bloomberg News




By Jennifer Jacobs
February 24, 2018, 6:00 AM EST

The White House is considering the idea of using restraining orders to take firearms away from people considered dangerous as part of its response to last week’s massacre at a Florida high school, two people familiar with the matter said.

Under extreme risk protection orders, which are also known as red flag laws or gun violence restraining orders, firearms can be confiscated from people found to be at risk.

The White House is studying an Indiana version of the law, and is considering other measures as well, according to the people, who requested anonymity to discuss policy deliberations. Four other states also have such laws.

At the White House on Thursday, Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi described to President Donald Trump similar efforts underway in her state to allow law enforcement to seize firearms from someone who is deemed to be a danger to themselves or others.

Read more: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-02-24/white-house-said-to-consider-protection-orders-to-curb-shootings

37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump Weighs Red Flag Orders to Take Guns Away Quickly (Original Post) DonViejo Feb 2018 OP
IRONY..............repubs threaten to take your guns away Angry Dragon Feb 2018 #1
Delicious! JohnnyLib2 Feb 2018 #6
RED FLAG REPUBLICANS TAKING YOUR GUNS AWAY! Hermit-The-Prog Feb 2018 #16
Wow bdtrppr6 Feb 2018 #2
If This Was Obama In Office Considering This The Repugs Would Jump All Over This..... global1 Feb 2018 #3
I say "if this was Obama" for anything this WH does JDC Feb 2018 #7
I think it will go nowhere. 45 will fold. bitterross Feb 2018 #27
But.. wendyb Feb 2018 #4
Silent Movie BlueIdaho Feb 2018 #5
It is important that he said it Angry Dragon Feb 2018 #10
Not really. No one with a brain listens to him for any sort of direction. bitterross Feb 2018 #29
Yes, let's use an Indiana law TwistOneUp Feb 2018 #8
Oh come on peeps, this has been widely discussed/proposed for the past week - incl npr and various Kashkakat v.2.0 Feb 2018 #9
As you say, watch tRUMP's actions not words... SWBTATTReg Feb 2018 #11
Pam Bondie, FL attorney general OhNo-Really Feb 2018 #12
Raises questions.. KY_EnviroGuy Feb 2018 #13
+100,000,000,000 atreides1 Feb 2018 #21
It's a start ... they will get a hearing and due process MaryMagdaline Feb 2018 #31
Under this theory, could we take the military away from Trump's control? LastLiberal in PalmSprings Feb 2018 #14
Just tell him about Sadat Cold War Spook Feb 2018 #22
Given his grasp of the Middle East ("Nobody knows the Arabs better than me," he'll tell you), LastLiberal in PalmSprings Feb 2018 #25
K & R Duppers Feb 2018 #15
How would this work? Politicub Feb 2018 #17
I'm looking forward to telling his base that Ilsa Feb 2018 #18
Why would you want to stir up resistance to this? nt B2G Feb 2018 #23
Only to tear them apart, Ilsa Feb 2018 #32
Awesome strategy. B2G Feb 2018 #35
It's a rational start DeminPennswoods Feb 2018 #19
He carries. truthisfreedom Feb 2018 #20
Re-register all guns in America and Maxheader Feb 2018 #24
Your assuming the govt has any idea who own guns. EX500rider Feb 2018 #26
Canada tried that. It ended in failure NickB79 Feb 2018 #33
Right, That ain't fucking happening njhoneybadger Feb 2018 #28
I don't know about this. Yonnie3 Feb 2018 #30
I'm looking for the Onion byline. Ferrets are Cool Feb 2018 #34
Sounds like jazzcat23 Feb 2018 #36
The only Red Flag I know and respect. raven mad Feb 2018 #37
 

bdtrppr6

(796 posts)
2. Wow
Sat Feb 24, 2018, 02:41 PM
Feb 2018

that sounds surprisingly rational. At least some kind of step in the right direction.

global1

(26,507 posts)
3. If This Was Obama In Office Considering This The Repugs Would Jump All Over This.....
Sat Feb 24, 2018, 02:43 PM
Feb 2018

and say - 'See Obama wants to take your guns away' or 'this is the first step of Obama taking your guns away'.

But it's not Obama - it's Trump.

How do you think this will go over?

JDC

(11,111 posts)
7. I say "if this was Obama" for anything this WH does
Sat Feb 24, 2018, 03:01 PM
Feb 2018

Completely agree. They would (and may still) freak out like the world was ending at sundown.

 

bitterross

(4,066 posts)
27. I think it will go nowhere. 45 will fold.
Sun Feb 25, 2018, 12:48 PM
Feb 2018

The NRA will win again. It is all about the power of the $.

wendyb

(60 posts)
4. But..
Sat Feb 24, 2018, 02:44 PM
Feb 2018

Let's not forget asshole signed an order rescinding Obama's stopping of the selling guns to the the mentally ill.

BlueIdaho

(13,582 posts)
5. Silent Movie
Sat Feb 24, 2018, 02:45 PM
Feb 2018

Don’t bother listening to anything Donny says, just watch what he does. Like so many other things this asshat says - this will never happen.

 

bitterross

(4,066 posts)
29. Not really. No one with a brain listens to him for any sort of direction.
Sun Feb 25, 2018, 12:50 PM
Feb 2018

He says so much that isn't true and flips on it all the time. No one with a brain would believe he's serious about that for a minute. I think we all know he just said it in the moment to take the heat off himself.

Ryan and McConnell saying it might be a big deal. 45 saying - ho hum.

TwistOneUp

(1,020 posts)
8. Yes, let's use an Indiana law
Sat Feb 24, 2018, 03:02 PM
Feb 2018

That no doubt ignores dangerous christians and exempts them from weapons seizures.

After all, religious freedom means those voices in your head are gahd calling...

Kashkakat v.2.0

(1,940 posts)
9. Oh come on peeps, this has been widely discussed/proposed for the past week - incl npr and various
Sat Feb 24, 2018, 03:04 PM
Feb 2018

progressive commentators.

Its been presented as something that moderate repubs could possibly agree to.

Implementing it would not be the end of the discussion - not by any means - but its something.

Its a case of the proverbial broken clock being right twice a day. Or in the case of Republicans, maybe its right once every ten years.

SWBTATTReg

(26,257 posts)
11. As you say, watch tRUMP's actions not words...
Sat Feb 24, 2018, 03:20 PM
Feb 2018

Also, I think some states have more gun rights that they enacted that anything that tRUMP does on the federal level won't have any impact on.

Believe me, if there was a way that gun lovers could enact a law or the like on the local level, more beneficial to the gun rights advocates, they would have.

Efforts need to start at the state and local level too. In MO, the state overrode the city of St. Louis in handling of crimes committed by guns. Here's a quick blurb on efforts by the repug. controlled legislature in MO to do this...


Armed for 2017: New state gun laws shrink “gun-free zones ...
https://www.salon.com/2017/01/04/armed-for-2017-new-state-gun-laws...
Jan 04, 2017 · Armed for 2017: New state gun laws shrink “gun-free zones,” expand access to concealed carry without training or permit Republicans in Missouri and

KY_EnviroGuy

(14,782 posts)
13. Raises questions..
Sat Feb 24, 2018, 03:56 PM
Feb 2018

Quote: "seize firearms from someone who is deemed to be a danger to themselves or others".

Who would do the "deeming"?

Although it sounds good on the surface, I can see this as having at least two big problems:
1. Such laws could be used my politicians or law enforcement to take guns from legitimate gun owners that someone in power does not like.
2. I suspect the ammosexuals would tie test cases up in court (claiming unconstitutionality) all the way to the SCOTUS.

I seriously think this is just right-wing political noise to try and quieten some of the current demand for regulation.


MaryMagdaline

(7,964 posts)
31. It's a start ... they will get a hearing and due process
Sun Feb 25, 2018, 01:27 PM
Feb 2018

You can be thrown out of your house on the word of your partner, you get a hearing to remove the restraining order. You would get a hearing to try to get your guns back.

14. Under this theory, could we take the military away from Trump's control?
Sat Feb 24, 2018, 05:36 PM
Feb 2018

Clearly, given his threats to North Korea he's a person who could be considered dangerous and at risk.

The first thing I'd do would be to get rid of that f*cking parade.

25. Given his grasp of the Middle East ("Nobody knows the Arabs better than me," he'll tell you),
Sun Feb 25, 2018, 12:42 PM
Feb 2018

I would imagine IQ45's reaction to the statement, "Remember Sadat," would be this:

"I know Sadat--great guy, great guy, a good friend of mine, a good friend. Just played golf with him at one of my beautiful golf courses, probably the most beautiful, all my golf courses are beautiful, very beautiful. Nobody builds more beautiful golf courses than me. We talked about a lot of stuff -- how important building a wall between his country and mine is, how much I won the election by, how everyone is loving my tax cuts--which by the way were the biggest tax cuts ever, my 50% approval rating--higher than Obama's or crooked Hillary's. The kinda stuff important people talk about. Sadat was literally unable to talk at times, because he was so impressed by my accomplishments in just a year, more than any president in history. Believe me."

Politicub

(12,328 posts)
17. How would this work?
Sat Feb 24, 2018, 08:33 PM
Feb 2018

Is there some sort of gun registry that the fedgov would be able to check, or would they be knocking on doors of those who get red flagged to see if they have guns?

Ilsa

(64,371 posts)
32. Only to tear them apart,
Sun Feb 25, 2018, 02:22 PM
Feb 2018

Start infighting, especially if the idea looks to be deadending. If I thought it had a real chance of happening, I'd be happy to keep them in denial.

DeminPennswoods

(17,506 posts)
19. It's a rational start
Sun Feb 25, 2018, 08:01 AM
Feb 2018

Had FL has this type of law, especially given they couldn't use the Baker Act to involuntarily commit Cruz, maybe none of this happens. Cruz certainly gave off warning signs to a lot of people.

Maxheader

(4,419 posts)
24. Re-register all guns in America and
Sun Feb 25, 2018, 11:47 AM
Feb 2018

confiscate all weapons that aren't single load..single short...
That is the only way. Incarcerate all those resisting.

EX500rider

(12,583 posts)
26. Your assuming the govt has any idea who own guns.
Sun Feb 25, 2018, 12:46 PM
Feb 2018

"I sold them awhile back"
"It fell overboard while fishing"
"They were stolen and I forgot to report it"

Yonnie3

(19,458 posts)
30. I don't know about this.
Sun Feb 25, 2018, 01:00 PM
Feb 2018

Sure it sounds good and in some instances would be a very good thing. From slogan to deed seems very difficult for those (temporarily) in power. Sometimes a "red flag" could be a red herring or a false flag.

I don't want them to get away with doing only one relatively small thing and then be able to say they're done.

I can hear them campaigning now based on this one incremental improvement. "We acted on gun violence, a major accomplishment for the Republicans."

If it's not smoke and mirrors, I'll support it, but that's no where near enough will be my position.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump Weighs Red Flag Ord...