Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,872 posts)
Mon May 14, 2018, 04:39 PM May 2018

U.S. high court throws out Louisiana death row inmate's conviction

Source: Reuters

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday threw out a Louisiana death row inmate’s conviction for a 2008 triple murder, finding that his lawyer violated the man’s constitutional rights by ignoring his objections and telling jurors the defendant killed the victims.

The court ruled 6-3 that Robert McCoy, 44, should receive a new trial. McCoy was convicted of killing the mother, stepfather and son of his estranged wife in Bossier City, Louisiana. All were shot in the head at close range.

The justices found that McCoy’s right to legal representation at trial under the U.S. Constitution’s Sixth Amendment was violated.

“The ruling restores in Louisiana the constitutional right of every individual to present their defense to a jury. While rare in the rest of the country, what happened to Mr. McCoy was a part of Louisiana’s broken criminal justice system that fails to respect individual human dignity,” said Richard Bourke, one of McCoy’s current lawyers.

-snip-

SUPREME COURT MAY 14, 2018 / 10:22 AM / UPDATED 2 HOURS AGO
Lawrence Hurley
4 MIN READ


Read more: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-deathrow/u-s-high-court-throws-out-louisiana-death-row-inmates-conviction-idUSKCN1IF1XL

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U.S. high court throws out Louisiana death row inmate's conviction (Original Post) Eugene May 2018 OP
What a bizarre case. Dr. Strange May 2018 #1
Nasty tweetstorm from Orange Foolius in 3-2-1... jmowreader May 2018 #2
the lawyer did that azureblue May 2018 #3
Well, if he suspected it was reversible error... moriah May 2018 #5
he told the jury client was guilty despite client's wishes scipan May 2018 #6
Who would have guessed Alito, Thomas and Gorsuch were the dissent? bitterross May 2018 #4
Glad to hear Bradical79 May 2018 #7
They should just thorw out the death penalty altogether. Tommy_Carcetti May 2018 #8

azureblue

(2,146 posts)
3. the lawyer did that
Mon May 14, 2018, 05:34 PM
May 2018

to try to avoid a death sentence conviction. Didn't work - the murders were heinous enough to warrant a death penalty. It's not a matter of "human dignity" at all. It was a matter of trying to save a murderer from a death sentence.

scipan

(2,341 posts)
6. he told the jury client was guilty despite client's wishes
Tue May 15, 2018, 04:01 PM
May 2018

I guess the human dignity part is the right to plead what you wish to plead

 

bitterross

(4,066 posts)
4. Who would have guessed Alito, Thomas and Gorsuch were the dissent?
Mon May 14, 2018, 07:00 PM
May 2018

on edit: The title is supposed to be sarcasm.

Actually, I'm surprised this didn't come in 5-4 with Roberts along on the dissent.

Tommy_Carcetti

(43,174 posts)
8. They should just thorw out the death penalty altogether.
Tue May 15, 2018, 04:38 PM
May 2018

A wretched, completely pointless institution that is a shame on this country.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»U.S. high court throws ou...