Advising Bolton Is a 'Shadow N.S.C.'
Source: The New York Times
By Kenneth P. Vogel
May 21, 2018
WASHINGTON In the weeks after President Trump chose John Bolton to be his third national security adviser in March, Mr. Bolton, a veteran of the George W. Bush State Department whose bellicose manner kept him from a high-level job at the beginning of the Trump administration, engaged in his own speeded-up transition process, aided by a handful of longtime associates.
Drawn from the world of conservative politics, international consulting and defense contracting, and working out of the downtown Washington offices of Mr. Boltons political organizations, the group of advisers provided advice on National Security Council operations, while helping to vet prospective new hires for views that would be compatible with his own.
Nearly two months into Mr. Boltons tenure, some people familiar with the N.S.C. say the influence of his associates can be seen in the agencys effort to crackdown on leaks, as well as an exodus of agency staff and a roster of candidates now under consideration to take their place, and have taken to calling the associates a shadow N.S.C.
One of Mr. Boltons longtime associates, Charles M. Kupperman, a former Reagan administration official and defense contracting executive, has taken a temporary leadership post on the N.S.C., while at least three others Frederick H. Fleitz, Sarah Tinsley and David Wurmser are believed to be under consideration for posts.
Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/21/us/politics/advising-bolton-a-shadow-nsc-of-cronies.html
sandensea
(21,620 posts)i.e. the 9/11 Group.
McKim
(2,412 posts)Thanks for mentioning PNAC. Many have foregotten about them and many have never heard of them in the intervening years since the start of the War on Iraq. They need to be named, exposed and mentioned everywhere on the net. Americans need this information to understand todays events.
sandensea
(21,620 posts)As corruptible, treasonous, and downright impressionable as Cheeto is, the stage for a "new Pearl Harbor" appears to be set (God damn them).
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)MBS
(9,688 posts)flibbitygiblets
(7,220 posts)Is that what I just fucking read?
0rganism
(23,937 posts)and, according to the well-known 1st law of GOP statecraft ("accuse your opponents of planning to do what you're already doing"), it's been in the works for at least a year and public knowledge for quite a while. so my question is why the NYT is only getting around to reporting on it now...
Mc Mike
(9,114 posts)sandensea
(21,620 posts)God knows there are a lot of those in the current administration too (including Pence, I believe).