Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Devil Child

(2,728 posts)
Mon May 21, 2018, 02:38 PM May 2018

Russia's first sea-borne nuclear power plant arrives in Arctic

Source: Reuters

Russia’s first-floating nuclear power plant arrived in the Arctic port of Murmansk over the weekend in preparation for its maiden mission, providing electricity to an isolated Russian town across the Bering Strait from Alaska.

The state company behind the plant, called the “Akademik Lomonosov”, says it could pioneer a new power source for remote regions of the planet, but green campaigners have expressed concern about the risk of nuclear accidents. Greenpeace has called it the “nuclear Titanic”.

Russian state nuclear company Rosatom, which developed the floating power plant, said that it docked the unit in Murmansk on Saturday where it was towed from St Petersburg, the city where it was built.

In Murmansk it will take on board a supply of nuclear fuel. It will then will be towed to the town of Pevek in the Far Eastern region of Chukotka, separated from the U.S. state of Alaska by the 86-km (53 miles) wide Bering Strait. It will start operations there next year.

Read more: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-nuclear-greens/russias-first-sea-borne-nuclear-power-plant-arrives-in-arctic-idUSKCN1IM1A9



Floating nuclear power-plants. Complete with brutal looking Soviet-style design scheme. Ugly, but gets the job done I guess.
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Russia's first sea-borne nuclear power plant arrives in Arctic (Original Post) Devil Child May 2018 OP
Hey, what could go wrong? nt 7962 May 2018 #1
No problem - if it starts to melt down they tow it to the East. lagomorph777 May 2018 #2
I guess in a way, its SURROUNDED by 'coolant"! 7962 May 2018 #3
Or "diluent" lagomorph777 May 2018 #4
"I can see and feel Russian fallout from my house!" Devil Child May 2018 #5
"The plant will replace a coal-fired power plant and an aging nuclear power plant" FBaggins May 2018 #6
You've got a point......but Russian "quality" is still a rarity! 7962 May 2018 #7
Lol... which brings us back to the four old units FBaggins May 2018 #8
I think this is very suspicious. MGKrebs May 2018 #9

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
4. Or "diluent"
Mon May 21, 2018, 02:47 PM
May 2018

Which is probably not a great thing.

As a coolant, it's tremendously corrosive; not the kind of thing you want to swirl around inside a reactor's intricate plumbing. But yeah, they are probably planning to do exactly that.

FBaggins

(26,721 posts)
6. "The plant will replace a coal-fired power plant and an aging nuclear power plant"
Mon May 21, 2018, 03:00 PM
May 2018

Surely a brand new reactor is preferable to four 45-year old reactors plus a coal plant?

FBaggins

(26,721 posts)
8. Lol... which brings us back to the four old units
Mon May 21, 2018, 03:04 PM
May 2018

Some of the only reactors left in the world that use graphite moderation (can anyone say Chernobyl?)

MGKrebs

(8,138 posts)
9. I think this is very suspicious.
Mon May 21, 2018, 03:15 PM
May 2018

That Chukotka region is bigger than Texas, and has 50,000 people total. This just seems like an odd way to get power to them.
I suspect this has more to do with the Arctic ice melting and some plans they have for exploiting that.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Russia's first sea-borne ...