MH17 downed by Russian military missile system, say investigators
Source: The Guardian
Dutch investigators say they have uncovered hard evidence that a Russian army missile system fired the missile that shot down flight MH17 over eastern Ukraine in 2014.
The Malaysian Airlines Boeing 777 was travelling from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur when it was shot down over the conflict zone in eastern Ukraine on 17 July 2014. All 298 people onboard were killed.
In 2016, Dutch investigators announced they had evidence that the BUK system involved in the incident had crossed the border into eastern Ukraine from Russia and returned after the plane had been shot down.
At a press conference in The Hague on Thursday, Dutch police and prosecutors showed photo and video evidence they said proved that they had identified the specific BUK system responsible for shooting down the plane. They said they now had legal and convincing evidence which will stand in a courtroom that the BUK system involved came from the 53rd anti-aircraft missile brigade based in Kursk in western Russia.
Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/may/24/mh17-downed-by-russian-military-missile-system-say-investigators
Glamrock
(11,795 posts)We, uhm aren't going to comment about ongoing international, uhm investigations.
trusty elf
(7,385 posts)marble falls
(57,075 posts)bronxiteforever
(9,287 posts)Thank you
Achilleaze
(15,543 posts)** per ronald freaking reagan
TimeSnowDemos
(476 posts)Of course it's not like the US hasn't shot down an airline or two...
marble falls
(57,075 posts)liner with 290 passengers got angry over your post.
Iran Air Flight 655
On 3 July 1988, Iran Air Flight 655, a scheduled civilian passenger flight from Tehran to Dubai, was shot down by an SM-2MR surface-to-air missile fired from, a guided missile cruiser of the United States Navy. The aircraft, an Airbus A300, was destroyed and all 290 people on board including 66 children were killed.More at Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_Air_Flight_655
TimeSnowDemos
(476 posts)but even more sorry that so many Americans don't know about thousands of things like this in US history.
7962
(11,841 posts)The US admitted shooting down that airliner.
The Russians have blamed everyone but the Pope for the Malaysian shoot down.
TimeSnowDemos
(476 posts)Last edited Thu May 24, 2018, 09:57 AM - Edit history (1)
The US fought admitting any and responsibility, despite lots of evidence to the contrary. And in their final settlement they only agreed to pay on the basis that they were not found responsible.
Add to that, the US' best defense is incompetence. The same is probably true with Russia and this airliner. It's an extremely on the nose comparison, and should be kept in mind when the US media talks about this issue.
Finally, US complaints about Iranian behavior is the actual whataboutism in this relationship. Americans may not know the history of Iranian/US interactions, but Europe and the ME do. And they have about as much time for US moaning and fear mongering about Iran as they do for Israeli moaning about the Palestinians. Which is to say very very very little.
7962
(11,841 posts)The Russians faked pictures, faked data, accused others, etc, ever since it happened. And have YET to even admit that one of their misses was used.
Not sure what the Palestinian fiasco has to do with any of this, but MOST of the ME is certainly concerned with the Iranians and their constant support of terror groups. The Europeans are now worried about the flood of migrants they're having to deal with after ignoring warnings of what was going to happen. But hey, hopefully they learn from their mistakes.
The ME is FAR less concerned with Iranian backed terror groups than they are another US war. They know as Americans should that Iran has NO history of starting war - unlike the US - no history of plotting and carrying out illegal coups - unlike the US.
So you know, I'm an ex-pat living in Europe. Your impression of Europe is pretty uninformed.
And for the record, the US DID try and cover up what happened with Flight 655. They lied about where the US ship was (It was in Iranian water) and they lied about the aggressive behavior of the commanding officer of the US ship. Independent investigators from the US and Europe also poked holes in contradictory explanations put forth by the US for the murder of 290 civilians, who were mostly women and children.
These lies and attempts to cover up a crime have been documented in the US media, like in Slate back in 2014. You'll note the headline:
"The time the United States blew up a passenger planeand tried to cover it up."
"American officials told various lies and blamed the Iranian pilot. Not until eight years later did the U.S. government compensate the victims families, and even then expressed deep regret, not an apology."
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/war_stories/2014/07/the_vincennes_downing_of_iran_air_flight_655_the_united_states_tried_to.html?via=gdpr-consent
This article has a clear time table of all of the lies the US government told to cover up what it did - they also repeatedly blamed the Iranians, going so far as to claim it was a suicide attack at one point:
https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2017/07/03/the-forgotten-us-shootdown-of-iranian-airliner-flight-655%C2%AD/
So, you know... it was an extremely apt comparison and I stand by it.
7962
(11,841 posts)And about 1/2 my family is European. I go by what they tell me as well as what I see on the news. Not asking you where you live, but that itself has a LOT to do with the impact of the problems.
TimeSnowDemos
(476 posts)I live here. Whatever you might see on the news or anecdotal evidence you might hear from some relation is about like you summing up America to a European... if you HAPPEN to hate Trump you'll give the impression that all of America hates Trump, potentially, and that's far from true.
Come visit and see for yourself. The US caused refugee crisis was a HUGE deal a few years ago, but has largely receded from view. Right wing media DESPERATELY tries to keep it alive, but... it's just not a big deal generally speaking...
Europeans are however aware that the US is responsible for that crisis, and has ZERO interest in yet another US war on it's villain du jour.
The image I posted was wrong, btw., but the story is right. The US murdered a bunch of women and children - hardly the first time that's happened - and then blamed the victims - all while lying about it's behavior to cover-up it's complicity.
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,393 posts)Here's how it appears in the original article at Wikipedia:
....
Critique of U.S. media coverage
Newsweek covers for 12 September 1983 (left) and 18 July 1988 (right), illustrating the KAL007 and Iran Air incidents respectively. A full-page photo of the airplane with "Murder in the Air" leaves little doubt in reader's mind of who the culprits were, while "Why it Happened" with no graphic presentation of the airplane is accompanied by questioning and soul-searching.
Quick geography lesson: that's Japan behind the plane and Alaska in the upper right hand corner. The Korean Peninsula (North and South Korea) is in orange.
The aircraft itself is clearly a Boeing 747.
Just to be sure, you can right click on the image and select "Search Google for image." This shows up right away:
NEWSWEEK REWIND: WHEN KOREAN AIR LINES FLIGHT 007 WAS SHOT DOWN
BY ROB VERGER ON 7/17/14 AT 5:31 PM
ETA, 10:06 a.m.: the original post has been corrected. Thanks.
TimeSnowDemos
(476 posts)I confused myself and posted the wrong thing. I will edit the original post. The fact of the matter is that the US media did cover it very differently than the US media, and only in the last few years is the US media catching up to the reality of the story.
NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)The pilots bodies were filled with the fragmentation shrapnel from the warhead. The missile flew from below and exploded just outside and overhead of the pilots window, with the fragmentation pieces shredding the fuselage and breaking the plane apart. The unique shape of fragmentation pieces was only used in one type of Russian Missile System.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,306 posts)that it belonged to. While there was good evidence for which that was before, as well, this is the official investigation, saying it's strong enough to stand up in court.
Response to NutmegYankee (Reply #5)
Name removed Message auto-removed
NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)Who makes the Buk? Oh right!
marble falls
(57,075 posts)"At a press conference in The Hague on Thursday, Dutch police and prosecutors showed photo and video evidence they said proved that they had identified the specific BUK system responsible for shooting down the plane. They said they now had legal and convincing evidence which will stand in a courtroom that the BUK system involved came from the 53rd anti-aircraft missile brigade based in Kursk in western Russia."
marble falls
(57,075 posts)7962
(11,841 posts)marble falls
(57,075 posts)7962
(11,841 posts)Botany
(70,489 posts)как погода в Ст Петербург?
Igel
(35,300 posts)Even then it's still not right, but at least it's not like saying "he were sittings in sofa-the on."
Google trashlate isn't all that good, for all the press saying how great AI is.
(Personally, artificial insemination is a bad thing to have as the same abbreviation.)
Codeine
(25,586 posts)on this issue was practically a religion around here. I do NOT miss that group of posters.
magicarpet
(14,144 posts)NT
FBaggins
(26,727 posts)Ah... those were the days.
Remember when RT and Sputnik werent really Russian propaganda outlets and US news services were worse?
7962
(11,841 posts)When you see a member who ONLY posts on items regarding Russia and Ukraine it kinda gives you a tiny "hint"
marble falls
(57,075 posts)dalton99a
(81,450 posts)Just like in 2016
7962
(11,841 posts)Only Russian apologists ever thought otherwise
Igel
(35,300 posts)There were enough people eager to bash the "fascist" Ukrainians over all sorts of things, esp. since they were vaguely pro-EU or pro-American.
Some were pro-Russian apologists. Some were "anybody but the US" or "anybody but the EU" antagonists.
Some merely fell for the BS that the Ukrainians were all fascists since some looked fascist and some were fascist. But 1-3% of the vote does not make the other 98% or so tainted. Such binary thinking is anathema to any sort of even moderately superficial understanding.
There are 10 kinds of people in the world. Those who understand binary and those who don't.
Response to muriel_volestrangler (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)Enjoy your stay, Comrade.
FBaggins
(26,727 posts)The US didnt spend years pretending that somebody else had shot it down Let alone pay shills To post such claims online
7962
(11,841 posts)Yes, people care, because of Russian denials and faked "proof" tossed out early on.
marble falls
(57,075 posts)to the Iranian people and the Russians ran out like the cowards and morally/ethically challenged bullies they are and lied about and hid their shit.
Lulu KC
(2,565 posts)The piece I can't seem to find: What was Russia's motivation?
1. Someone on board they wanted to literally bring down? Specific people or one type of European?
2. Just to make Ukraine look like random shooters of foreign airplanes?
3. A problem with Malaysia?
Also finding it interesting that Netherlands are discussing Magnitsky Act right now. Just a little thread of everything being connected, once again.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,306 posts)DONETSK, July 17. /ITAR-TASS/. Militiamen of the self-proclaimed Donetsk Peoples Republic (DPR) brought down a military transport Antonov-26 (An-26) plane of the Ukrainian Air Force on the outskirts of the town of Torez, eyewitnesses said.
A missile hit the An-26, it fell on the ground and caught blaze, they said.
On July 14, militiamen of the self-proclaimed Luhansk Peoples Republic downed another An-26 of the Ukrainian Air Force.
More:
http://tass.ru/en/world/741164
Torez is where MH17 was shot down. No An-26 was shot down that day.
Igel
(35,300 posts)Was it the commanders on the scene?
Was it the Russian-oriented commanders in charge of them?
Was it Strel'kov, I think Girin was going by at the time?
Was it some mid-level commander across the border in Russia?
Was it some upper-level commander?
Was it the Great Putin himself?
Each would have different set of facts, set of goals, and therefore a slightly different motivation. Perhaps they thought they were shooting down a transport. Perhaps some other military plane, a fighter or bomber perhaps? Perhaps they were targeting civilian (although I think that unlikely). Perhaps they assumed help was coming for the gay Jewish fascist Nazis they were fighting. Qui sait?
Trying to determine another's motivation by navel-gazing is a rather silly endeavor. Even if it's the other person's navel that's in your line of sight. Trying to determine it based on domestic US politics or current politics make that look like the epitome of wise.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)Glad to finally see it official...
God, if even five percent of the smartasses talking shit at me were still around now...
Fuck you Seymour Hersh for regurgitating Kremlin agitprop with no retraction...
And I don't care if he's deceased, FUCK YOU to Robert Parry and everyone who defended his bullshit...