Food aid curbs sought by Republicans would hit rural poor
Source: Reuters
JUNE 15, 2018 / 6:09 AM / UPDATED 7 HOURS AGO
Amanda Becker
WEBSTER COUNTY, W.Va. (Reuters) - Bruce Greens family of six scratches out a living in this remote, politically conservative corner of the Appalachian Mountains thanks in part to about $600 a month in U.S. food aid.
For the Greens and other rural Americans who get nutrition assistance, making ends meet could get tougher if Republicans in Washington, including President Donald Trump, carry out plans to make it harder to qualify for food aid.
If I lose even $100 of that, it would be devastating, said Green, 35, a registered independent voter who said he leans conservative. He earns $23,000 annually as a county appraiser. Greens wife Barbara stays home with their four children.
A Republican plan to curb food aid is under consideration in the U.S. House of Representatives as part of a broad farm bill. Its future is uncertain, with Democrats opposed to it. A farm bill in the U.S. Senate proposes no major food aid changes.
Read more: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-congress-food-aid/food-aid-curbs-sought-by-republicans-would-hit-rural-poor-idUSKBN1JB13D
beachbum bob
(10,437 posts)Karma is a bitch...but tricks maybe used to filter...such as population density in defined areas, but seems to be a lawsuit bait for sure
bearsfootball516
(6,377 posts)I feel bad for his kids, but not for him.
BumRushDaShow
(129,050 posts)in order to take care of the children. Yet if the same woman had been a POC in an urban area, she would be called "lazy" by his "conservative" (GOP) buddies and told to "get a job" and to hell with her children because she shouldn't have had so many (or any) and should have other family members or "The Church" take care of them.
DBoon
(22,366 posts)IOKIYAW
BumRushDaShow
(129,050 posts)lunasun
(21,646 posts)any other than Appalachia white
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)Brilliant strategy. Let's capitalize on it!
Achilleaze
(15,543 posts)Scalded Nun
(1,236 posts)Well, asswipe, keep leaning. When you fall you'll drag your whole family with you.
I just can't feel sorry for these people any more. Not even their kids.
OK, so I am no longer a 'good' Christian.
dalton99a
(81,512 posts)appalachiablue
(41,138 posts)need to study actual news, brush up on civics and find out what's happening politically now in this country. But chances of that aren't so good and how long has it been since a decent Dem. candidate challenged the GOP in that conservative area. Unfortunately Mr. Green and others might find out what 'conserve' really means, in terms of significant loss of food support. Learn the hard way what conservative GOP policy really means now.
USDA, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), A Short History of SNAP
- Pilot Food Stamp Program - May 29, 1961-1964:
Mr. and Mrs. Alderson Muncy of Paynesville, West Virginia, were the first food stamp recipients on May 29, 1961. They purchased $95 in food stamps for their 15-person household. In the first food stamp transaction, they bought a can of pork and beans at Henderson's Supermarket. By January 1964, the pilot programs had expanded from eight areas to 43 (40 counties, Detroit, St. Louis, and Pittsburgh) in 22 States with 380,000 participants. https://www.fns.usda.gov/snap/short-history-snap
bucolic_frolic
(43,173 posts)Better hide however you can
Solly Mack
(90,768 posts)You base your core being on stubbornly held - though fallacious - beliefs and the "who am I better than today?" hierarchy of prejudice and life has a way of biting you in the ass for your devotion to all the wrong people and causes.
ck4829
(35,077 posts)modrepub
(3,495 posts)Cutting SNAP benefits is certainly a tragedy for families but remember stores often rely on this to keep them running. People deprived of food stamps aren't going to find money to go back to the store and buy it. That means stores loose money and possibly shut down making everyone have to potentially drive further to the next store and/or have their grocery bill go up.