Giuliani: 'Collusion is not a crime'
Source: The Hill
President Trump's lawyer Rudy Giuliani on Monday dismissed the investigation into suspected collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, saying that collusion is not a crime.
I have been sitting here looking in the federal code trying to find collusion as a crime, Giuliani said on Fox & Friends.
Collusion is not a crime.
The presidents attorney maintained that his client is absolutely innocent and said that the recently released tapes of conversations between Trump and his former lawyer Michael Cohen prove that the president didnt do anything wrong.
I don't even know if that's a crime, colluding about Russians, Giuliani said. You start analyzing the crime the hacking is the crime. The president didn't hack. He didnt pay them for hacking.
Read more: http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/399461-giuliani-collusion-is-not-a-crime
rsdsharp
(9,205 posts)lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)"Russia, if you're listening"
Well, from Mueller's recent indictment of the Russian hackers, we know Russia was, indeed, listening.
spooky3
(34,483 posts)Paint a conspiracy picture. And we know about only a tiny percentage of them, probably.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)spooky3
(34,483 posts)lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)Beartracks
(12,821 posts)truthisfreedom
(23,157 posts)bitterross
(4,066 posts)It's a softer, gentler way to say it.
forgotmylogin
(7,533 posts)olegramps
(8,200 posts)olegramps
(8,200 posts)johnp3907
(3,733 posts)We knew it was coming.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)jcgoldie
(11,648 posts)Ok so what if there was collusion?!?
forgotmylogin
(7,533 posts)Looking under chairs for "collusion".
Historic NY
(37,453 posts)[link:https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/collusion|]
: secret agreement or cooperation especially for an illegal or deceitful purpose
acting in collusion with the enemy
theaocp
(4,245 posts)Dodgy language is the bread and butter of lawyers. Hopefully, it doesn't make any difference what with his gaping maw.
LeftInTX
(25,563 posts)"Colluding about Russia"
Sounds like a nonsense phrase to me....
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)dictionary definition?
Looks like Rudy has forgotten everything about criminal from law school to dictator defender.
But we all know the lies are for consumption by the pathetically weak minded and gullable cult.
Historic NY
(37,453 posts)That is the crime!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)with you right now to make sense of the word jibber jabber and we have! And it is not a crime...but colluding with a foreign government to steal an election...bet Rudy thinks no one would ever dream that up...even if it is plastered all over criminal code laws all over the world.
Historic NY
(37,453 posts)Synonyms
design, intrigue, machination, plot, scheme
counterconspiracy, counterplot;
frame-up; manipulation, subterfuge, trickery;
artifice, contrivance, cover-up, dodge, draft, maneuver, stratagem, trick;
cabal, confederacy, ring; game, gimmick, racket;
ground plan, program, strategy, system;
collusion, complicity, connivance, conniving, conspiration
sprinkleeninow
(20,264 posts)MrScorpio
(73,631 posts)turbinetree
(24,720 posts)he and his gang can run around all day long and commit treason...............
secondwind
(16,903 posts)Renew Deal
(81,876 posts)They just call it something else.
Gothmog
(145,619 posts)President Obama's attorney has some good articles on this. Here is just one https://www.justsecurity.org/42387/collusion-russia-crime-part-iii-aiding-abetting/
It is well understood that established aiding and abetting principles have wide, elastic application. The abettor is not required, of course, to have been in on it from the beginning. In Learned Hands classic formulation in United States v. Peoni, the law requires only that he in some sort associate himself with the venture, that he participate in it as in something that he wishes to bring about, that he seek by his action to make it succeed. The courts have defined in various terms this association, but what is required is some affirmative conduct designed to aid in the success of a venture with knowledge that [the]actions would assist the perpetrator, the principal of the crime. United States v. Cowart, 595 F.2d 1023, 1031(1979).
Note that the assistance constituting aiding and abetting does not have to be substantial. The accomplice liability provision of the federal campaign finance law, focused on substantial assistance, is, in that sense, stricter. ,So federal prosecutors proceeding on an aiding and abetting theory may have the latitude to reach a broader range of Trump campaign conduct in support of the Russian program.
It would not be the first time that Prosecutors would have enforced campaign finance law with an aiding and abetting charge. And they have evidence in the Trump/Russia case with which to work.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)no collusion, just coordinating, assisting, aiding and abetting, encouraging, failing to report...all in collusion with each other in furtherance of a criminal enterprise by a foreign government...to steal a federal election.
No collusion, but there is that!
amcgrath
(397 posts)There was no collusion.
Mueller can't prove it happened.
Collusion isn't a crime.
And Trump didn't actually pay them for the hacked info.
Also Michael Cohen is a very fine upstanding man.
And Michael Cohen is a known liar, he's been lying for years
Thanks Rudy, for clearing that up.
louis-t
(23,297 posts)He did suggest to them on camera that they hack Hillary.
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,621 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(49,045 posts)Stage 5 is "It was a crime but we did it for the right reasons."
Stage 6 is "We don't talk about that part of history because we'll send you to a camp if you do."
dalton99a
(81,599 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)RestoreAmerica2020
(3,439 posts)...He's and his sycophants have been working the 'no collusion' at nauseam, aling 28th unending attack on media, press. Why the build up? Manafort, over 30 witnesses...trial begins July 31
Los Angeles Times Logo
SUBSCRIBE
NEWSLETTER
POLITICS
All eyes on Paul Manafort's trial this week
By JOHN MYERS
JUL 30, 2018 | 3:00 AM
All eyes on Paul Manafort's trial this week
Essential Politics (Los Angeles Times) 6/30/18)
A major legal test for President Trump is now only hours away, but its not one that directly invokes the ongoing investigation into the 2016 election.
Thats not to say, of course, that the presidential contest and Russian interference wont loom large over the proceedings.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)turbinetree
(24,720 posts)These upright citizens there Rudiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii never made the fucking call........................are you that fucking stupid.............. Or is the on to tight.............................
November 2018 cannot get here fast enough.......................vote
Botany
(70,589 posts).... elections and if they (Russia) tried to contact you call the FBI ASAP.
turbinetree
(24,720 posts)Traitors...................all of them, and now he trying to pack the court.................is next "guy" is meeting with Manchin III today....................I just can't wait to hear what he has to say.....................
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,869 posts)there is also no crime called "whacking" or "offing." But murder is illegal, and so is conspiracy. Calling an act a name that doesn't define a crime in the statute books doesn't mean the act isn't a crime.
Mrs. Overall
(6,839 posts)Starseer
(72 posts)The specific wording of the alleged crime is spelled out in an appropriate forum (e.g. the indictment, among others). The term "collusion" in this case is certain to be spelled out as "conspiracy" when the charges are laid.
As an aside, I am becoming convinced that Giuliani is either out of touch with reality, doesn't know how to represent a client any longer, or both. Were it not for Strickland, I'd be worried about Sixth Amendment shenanigans.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,869 posts)Or it would be if he were actually representing Trump in court. It's so bad it almost looks like intentional sabotage. If you were charged with littering and Rudy represented you, you'd probably end up in Supermax.
NewJeffCT
(56,829 posts)since the early 90s. His tenure as DA ended in 1989, then he worked in private law through 1992. I could not find any records of him actively representing a client during his private tenure. (I did not look very hard, admittedly)
He became mayor of NYC in 1993 and served there through 2001 during which he had his failed senate run versus Hillary in 2000. He then spent several years campaigning for other Republicans, leveraging his 9/11 popularity. In 2009, after his presidential bid tanked, he moved on to Giuliani Partners, a national security consulting firm.
LiberalFighter
(51,103 posts)underpants
(182,904 posts)and I don't think was orchestrated like calling the A. R. R. A. "The stimulus" as the right wing media did. Regardless of whether it worked or not (it did) or to what degree they set it up to be knocked down.
uponit7771
(90,364 posts)spooky3
(34,483 posts)Case is as weak as it is, and your supporters are willing to accept any argument, you grasp at this straw.
Native
(5,943 posts)Initech
(100,104 posts)Pluvious
(4,323 posts)Snellius
(6,881 posts)Crime? What crime? ... My killing a loathsome, harmful louse, a filthy old moneylender woman ... and you call that a crime?
― Fyodor Dostoyevsky
Trump seems to be confessing to crimes with which he hasn't even been charged.
The_Counsel
(1,660 posts)His only job here is to win this case in the Court of Public Opinion. That's why he's always on TV running his face. It is where he is most useful.
Where you WON'T see Guiliani is in a courtroom or on hand at any deposition. If he were to use the "collusion is not a crime" defense there any judge worth his/her salt would laugh in his face--and he knows it.
jalan48
(13,888 posts)Ccarmona
(1,180 posts)His only real job is to advise and defend his client if charges are filed, anything else he says pure poppycock for the benefit of the Trumpsters
elmac
(4,642 posts)18 USC 1030fraud and related activity in connection with computers;
18 USC 1343wire fraud; or 52 USC 30121contributions and donations by foreign nationals.
elmac
(4,642 posts)switched out conspiracy for collusion.
elleng
(131,140 posts)Don't take him too seriously. Sleeping with dogs, ya know.
Snellius
(6,881 posts)elmac
(4,642 posts)The fascist is just recycle goptv garbage.
elleng
(131,140 posts)the_sly_pig
(741 posts)What part of the Constitution or government has Drumpf protected? None of it. What has he tried to destroy for the benefit of foreign powers? All of it.
Snellius
(6,881 posts)Trump is afraid because he's finally learning how serious this crime is. The hard thing to prove is whether they knew the Russians were acting for the Russian government.
honest.abe
(8,685 posts)to help Trump win the election in exchange for dropping sanctions against them if he should win.
That is a serious crime.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,869 posts)And it's true that there is no federal crime that is called "collusion." However, colluding for the purpose of committing a crime is the for-real federal crime of conspiracy.
honest.abe
(8,685 posts)They must know Mueller has the goods on Trump and others in his crime family and the hammer is coming down soon and hard. I think they know their only hope is keep brainwashing their supporters with this nonsense in the hope that once the indictments come down they will rise up and defend Trump to such an extent that the GOP will be afraid to do anything about it.
SummerSnow
(12,608 posts)truthisfreedom
(23,157 posts)truthisfreedom
(23,157 posts)I don't even know if that's a crime, colluding about Russians, he said.
sprinkleeninow
(20,264 posts)miyazaki
(2,251 posts)that this investigation is not a witchhunt.
Fucking Rudolph, you just invested in another million dumb ass points.
relayerbob
(6,558 posts)However: Treason, conspiracy, cover-ups, witness threatening, money-laundering, breaking into voting booths to steal votes, breaking into servers to steal emails, slander and libel, ARE!! Can't wait to see you and all your buddies and clients wearing matching orange jumpsuits
Jedi Guy
(3,258 posts)"He didn't do it, but even if he did, it wasn't a crime. Witch hunt!"
This "administration" is just surreal.
KayF
(1,345 posts)he'll say Mueller needs to prove that Trump personally sat down and wrote the hacking code.
LiberalLovinLug
(14,176 posts)I know that even if you say...what if it were a Democrat
or what if this was say Hillary colluding with Maduro,
it is an unbelievable hypocrisy.
But even more jarring is if you put the present day GOP into the lens of the 50's Red Scare that was predominantly a Republican party onslaught with MccArthy at the top of the pile. Defending and protecting a Manchurian candidate, a twice divorced, cheating with porn stars President, beholden to a former Communist KGB officer who runs his country as a dictatorship. This AFTER the FBI, who used to be sacrosanct, found they definitely interfered in our elections and attacked our god-fearing nation.
honest.abe
(8,685 posts)Which I am sure for whom this was targeted.
ck4829
(35,091 posts)metalbot
(1,058 posts)Not the irritating one that most of the posts on this thread seem to think it is.
This is a big narrative shift, and it's a big step backwards for the Trump defense team. The fact that Guiliani is out there with this line now makes me think that they know that something big is coming, and he's been sent to get out ahead of it.
ck4829
(35,091 posts)Gothmog
(145,619 posts)Perseus
(4,341 posts)k?'lo?oZH?n/
noun
noun: collusion
secret or illegal cooperation or conspiracy, especially in order to cheat or deceive others.
"the armed forces were working in collusion with drug traffickers"
"trump and his minions colluded (conspired) with the Russians to rig the 2016 USA election thus making trump an illegitimate president."
"In criminal law, a conspiracy is an agreement between two or more persons to commit a crime.
Any questions?"
RobinA
(9,894 posts)crime is a crime. Grasp at straws, much?
duforsure
(11,885 posts)Who probably is forced into doing this because trumps got a lot of dirt on him. trump wants everyone to believe everyone's a liar except him, and rudy is promoting that propaganda for him for pr to do like they did to Hillary, make everyone believe the others are corrupt , and criminal , not themselves. rudy and trump are making the case against himself even better the more they talk. These guys are really , really corrupt and have no intentions of being honest about anything, especially trying to hide treason against OUR country by trump.
DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)now says to conspire is not a crime?
I guess he owes the Gambinos an apology. Hell, that family is less dangerous than the Trumps.
Perseus
(4,341 posts)But regardless, here you go:
col·lu·sion
kəˈlo͞oZHən/
noun
noun: collusion
secret or illegal cooperation or conspiracy, especially in order to cheat or deceive others.
yurbud
(39,405 posts)Foreign donations are illegal.
struggle4progress
(118,356 posts)Marcuse
(7,514 posts)RainCaster
(10,923 posts)Let's begin with you.
Hekate
(90,829 posts)...as someone pointed out on MSNBC, trying to explain the nature of synonyms.
Conspiracy is a crime, and that's what we've got here.
riversedge
(70,310 posts)ck4829
(35,091 posts)Shoonra
(523 posts)The offenses that will suffice for a presidential impeachment are not confined to conventional crimes, especially those set forth in legislation enacted after the Constitution was adopted (which means virtually all legislation), but are left to the good judgment of the Members of Congress.
Collusion with a foreign power, especially one considered hostile or adversarial, and especially for an unwholesome purpose like stealing an election, almost certainly falls within the category of impeachable offenses, even if it will not send someone to prison.
duforsure
(11,885 posts)But doing something stupid that's illegal is. He's trying in desperation to play word games . but collusion when actively conspiring with an enemy to effect an election is. Their biggest enemy is the truth, and they're losing their battle . They know it too.
Puzzler
(2,505 posts)-Puzzler
Linda Ed
(493 posts)it's the same damn thing as conspiracy..rudy has been hit with dementia...or he needs to go back to law school
Le Gaucher
(1,547 posts)duforsure
(11,885 posts)To be working probably for nothing because trump and russia got dirt on him now?
Soxderrube
(37 posts)col·lu·sion
[kəˈlo͞oZHən]
NOUN
secret or illegal cooperation or conspiracy, especially in order to cheat or deceive others.
OhZone
(3,212 posts)murder might be in some circumstances. But we're only talking killing here.