Senate Democrats skip hearing amid post-Kavanaugh tensions
Source: Associated Press
Senate Democrats skip hearing amid post-Kavanaugh tensions
By KEVIN FREKING
25 minutes ago
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Just when it seemed the partisan divide on the Senate Judiciary Committee couldn't get much worse, it did. ... Every Democrat on the panel skipped a Wednesday hearing on judicial nominations. The Democrats said the hearing should have been canceled because the Senate is not in session ahead of next month's election.
Republican Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley said he had already delayed the hearing at the request of Sen. Dianne Feinstein, the panel's top Democrat. He said he wouldn't agree to a "last-minute withdrawal."
Republicans also said that objections to the hearing came just a week before the hearing date and after families of the judicial nominees had already made travel arrangements. They also released the attendance record of Democratic lawmakers on the committee for previous confirmation hearings held this year to highlight how lightly attended some of the hearings were.
....
Six prospective federal judges testified at Wednesday's hearing, most notably Allison Jones Rushing, 36, of North Carolina, who is nominated to serve on the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. ... Grassley arranged for Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., to chair the hearing. Grassley did not attend.
....
Read more: https://www.apnews.com/f2057b6eca62468391ee6b1d02ad9b7a
also at DU:
Sen. Judiciary Comm. questions Trump's 4th Circuit nominee, 36 years old, less than 30 minutes
https://www.democraticunderground.com/11682501
47of74
(18,470 posts)I fucking hate them. They wouldn't even give President Obama's nominees the courtesy of hearings - not just Garland but lots of the lower court judges as well. Now that the orange fuck is in office they can't shovel his nominees in fast enough.
bucolic_frolic
(55,808 posts)The rise and fall of decades, economies, parties, policies, generations, norms ... these are what make judgment, wisdom, perspective. In my view 36 year olds just don't have it to be judges.
FBaggins
(28,762 posts)... how can she qualify to be on the Supreme Court at 45 if she doesn't first spend a few years on an appellate bench?
/sarcasm.
SunSeeker
(58,374 posts)Polybius
(22,117 posts)She could potentially destroy our ideas and beliefs for 50 years!
BumRushDaShow
(172,207 posts)Talk about pots and kettles.
GemDigger
(4,380 posts)It was just another of their I will say and do whatever it takes to get what I want.
YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.