Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
Tue Jan 10, 2012, 01:05 PM Jan 2012

Obama Ready to Strike to Stop Iran: Ex-Adviser (Dennis Ross)

By Indira A.R. Lakshmanan - Tue Jan 10 11:41:13 GMT 2012

No one should doubt that President Barack Obama is prepared to use military force to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon if sanctions and diplomacy fail, the president’s former special assistant on Iran said.

Obama has “made it very clear” that he regards a nuclear- armed Iran as so great a threat to international security that “the Iranians should never think that there’s a reluctance to use the force” to stop them, Dennis Ross, who served two years on Obama’s National Security Council and a year as Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s special adviser on Iran, said in an interview yesterday.

“There are consequences if you act militarily, and there’s big consequences if you don’t act,” said Ross, who in a two- hour interview at the Bloomberg Washington office laid out a detailed argument against those who say Obama would sooner “contain” a nuclear-armed Iran than strike militarily.

The administration considers the risks of permitting a nuclear-armed Iran to be greater than the risks of military action, said Ross, who last month rejoined the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, a research group.

MORE...

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-01-10/obama-prepared-to-use-force-to-stop-nuclear-iran-former-adviser-ross-says.html

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

rocktivity

(44,575 posts)
1. Candidate for this year's "You Call This NEWS?" Award
Tue Jan 10, 2012, 01:15 PM
Jan 2012

I'm not saying that this ex-adviser is wrong -- I'm just saying that this ex-adviser is an EX-ADVISER!!!


rocktivity

OKNancy

(41,832 posts)
2. You never know if this isn't part of a plan
Tue Jan 10, 2012, 01:55 PM
Jan 2012

Part of the "diplomacy". An ex-adviser puts it out there that the US would strike just as a kind of backdoor warning to make Iran think twice about it. Pretty sneaky/smart if it is.

 

RC

(25,592 posts)
3. Nobody needs to go after Iran because they are going nuclear.
Tue Jan 10, 2012, 01:57 PM
Jan 2012

Those people that think we do need to do so, need to study history for the reason why Iran feels the need to go nuclear in the first place. Another case where violence is begetting violence and the answer for some is more violence.
If we had left them alone back in 1953, would they be doing this now? Most likely not. Just like Iraq will come back to extract its revenge from us in a couple of generations.

Tempest

(14,591 posts)
4. "who last month rejoined the Washington Institute for Near East Policy"
Tue Jan 10, 2012, 02:34 PM
Jan 2012

Says all I need to know about Ross.


The establishment of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP) in 1985 greatly expanded the pro-Israel lobby's influence over policy as well. WINEP's founding director, Martin Indyk, had previously been research director of AIPAC which, then as now, focuses much of its efforts on Congress. Indyk developed WINEP into a highly effective think tank devoted to maintaining and strengthening the US-Israel alliance through advocacy in the media and lobbying the executive branch.

The result was the 1993 Oslo Declaration of Principles.

Thus, the adoption of WINEP's policy recommendation to "resist pressures for a procedural breakthrough" by both the Bush and Clinton administrations delayed the start of meaningful Israeli-Palestinian negotiations, contributed to the demonization of the PLO and multiplied the casualty rate of the first Palestinian intifada.

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Washington_Institute_for_Near_East_Policy

 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
5. If Obama is this stupid, he deserves to lose
Tue Jan 10, 2012, 02:51 PM
Jan 2012

Picking a fight with Iran is stupidity which would make the Iraq invasion look like the most brilliant military operation is U.S. history.

Attacking Iran is a quick way to push oil to $200 a barrel in about a week. Yeah, what Obama wants to help the economy is $7.00/gallon gasoline.

Tempest

(14,591 posts)
8. A 2003 report from military experts say $15-$20 a gallon
Tue Jan 10, 2012, 04:43 PM
Jan 2012

And as you said, if you could find it.

It would also cause our military machine to stop dead in its tracks.

FrenchieCat

(68,867 posts)
12. Yeah, but......
Tue Jan 10, 2012, 07:16 PM
Jan 2012

No one cares about what the Administration says....
only what others rumor it "may" do "if".....

You know how that goes, doncha?

Response to Purveyor (Original post)

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Obama Ready to Strike to ...