Graham: Campaign Finance Violations Have Never Been Used For Impeachment!
Source: Talking Points Memo
By David Taintor
December 14, 2018 4:42 pm
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), a staunch supporter of President Trump, said Friday that Trump directing Michael Cohen to make hush-money payments could represent a campaign finance violation "in theory." But he cautioned Democrats against crying impeachment.
"Campaign finance violations have never been used to impeach anybody," Graham told Neil Cavuto on Fox News.
"If you think that this is worthy of impeachment in the House, go ahead," Graham said. "I think most Americans probably won't agree with you."
Read more: https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/lindsey-graham-trump-impeachment-campaign-finance
Well asshole.....................Nixon had a slush fund from campaign funds, and you trying to bull shit about this, well, it's bull shit and a fucking lie.......... and you should be called out for this lie..................so fuck you......................... he got pardoned before he could be fucking indicted............................
https://www.nytimes.com/1974/12/09/archives/nixons-taped-remarks-onapparent-slush-fund-called-key-evidence-in.html
https://www.cnn.com/2012/02/04/politics/watergate-reform/index.html
November 3, 2020 cannot get here fast enough.........................
Sanity Claws
(22,413 posts)They are all a bunch of fuckers
NewJeffCT
(56,848 posts)almost certain of it
MiniMe
(21,883 posts)And how much money did Ken Starr spend to come up with Bupkis?
Corgigal
(9,298 posts)We need to find out why.
deurbano
(2,986 posts)They go to such lengths to defend the indefensible.
mpcamb
(3,228 posts)and Graham's shameless pandering (hiding I'm not sure what... pictures, Russians, recordings).
All of it smells like roadkill and the 2nd day.
KCDebbie
(664 posts)Iliyah
(25,111 posts)GOPers and their amnesia only suits them. Fuck them. Assholes.
bmpbmp
(310 posts)Mme. Defarge
(9,020 posts)mahina
(20,645 posts)htuttle
(23,738 posts)And Trump has done that dozens of times in public.
And one of the charges in Andrew Johnson's impeachment trial was 'Bringing disgrace and ridicule to the presidency'.
I think we got that one covered, too.
appleannie1943
(1,303 posts)That is when he turned on a dime and started building a protective wall around trump.
apcalc
(4,528 posts)UpInArms
(54,984 posts)nt
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)hlthe2b
(113,971 posts)The_Counsel
(1,757 posts)Donald Trump truly IS a unique individual, isn't he...?
YessirAtsaFact
(2,113 posts)They will talk tough for now but they know that more serious charges are coming.
VMA131Marine
(5,270 posts)There have only been two impeachments of US Presidents in US history and I'm pretty sure that there weren't any campaign finance laws in force when Andrew Johnson was President (not to mention that he became President as a result of Lincoln's assassination and did not run the election campaign).
That no President has been impeached on campaign finance violations is beside the point.
cstanleytech
(28,471 posts)You do remember what the Constitution is right? It's that thing you and the other Repugnants love to claim to follow like the sanctimonious sacks of shit that you are.
Kaleva
(40,365 posts)mucifer
(25,667 posts)the impeachment about trump being a foreign agent more than election pay offs or grifting money to relatives and friends. But, I'll take what I can.
mahina
(20,645 posts)/sarc
So fitting though.
ElementaryPenguin
(7,911 posts)GulfCoast66
(11,949 posts)Im sure more grounds for impeachment are soon to be forthcoming.
Maeve
(43,457 posts)And besides, y'all thought perjury was impeachable....
LonePirate
(14,367 posts)And those charges may include a conspiracy against the United States itself. You don't need to worry your little head over "minor" felonies tied to just campaign finance violations.
William Seger
(12,443 posts)Time for some new case law then, Lindsey. We can't go forward with the idea that if you're running for office, it's okay to pay hush money.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)its not trumps only criminal violation or unethical behavior.
Graham, youre an example of whats wrong with this country.
tableturner
(1,838 posts)And all of them are more than worthy of an impeachment effort. You can recite an almost endless list of impeachment-worthy crimes that have not been used to impeach.
That was such a boneheaded argument by Graham!
jpak
(41,780 posts)Fuck off Lindsey
BaronChocula
(4,555 posts)And no one named Donald has ever been impeached either... yet.
What's your point, Miss Thang?
truthisfreedom
(23,532 posts)duforsure
(11,885 posts)Since he and others took an oath of office to uphold the laws, and are ignoring them arrogantly and illegally now. That's a form of obstruction of justice.
WhiteTara
(31,260 posts)Her Lioness, Nancy Pelosi; queen of the pack.
louis-t
(24,618 posts)asshole.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(130,536 posts)there are a whole lot of crimes that haven't yet been the subject of impeachment. If a president commits, for example, armed robbery, would Graham argue that he can't be impeached for that because no president has ever been impeached for armed robbery.
Zorro
(18,692 posts)He'll run you over in a New York minute.
Jarqui
(10,909 posts)MFGsunny
(2,356 posts)... the days when Lady Lindsay thought to JAGGGGG for a while.
LiberalLovinLug
(14,689 posts)I want every news pundit to ask him that question whenever he is on the air.
The Liberal Lion
(1,414 posts)Especially now-a-days
DallasNE
(8,008 posts)So, of course, he is going to say nothing to see here. Russia probably pumped over $100 million into the 2016 campaign - all to support Republican candidates, either directly or indirectly. It was not a small time operation.
FreepFryer
(7,086 posts)Hassler
(4,924 posts)Apollyonus
(812 posts)kimbutgar
(27,248 posts)SayItLoud
(1,774 posts)Apollyonus
(812 posts)Murder, Armed Robbery, Rape, Kidnapping or Burglary have never been used in an impeachment either.
F*cking cons
Takket
(23,715 posts)so if a president kills someone should we just ignore it?
wryter2000
(47,940 posts)On which Avenue he does it on.
unblock
(56,198 posts)The term is meant to cover crimes of office, not necessarily violations of law.
Abusing the privileges of office, misusing the powers of office, neglecting the duties of office, or improperly acquiring the office are all high crimes and misdemeanors *even if they're not violations of law*
Donnie's short political career has been little more than a running stream of high crimes and misdemeanors.
MyOwnPeace
(17,557 posts)except - his political career has not been just a "little more than a running stream" - it's been a tsunami!
He needs to go - NOW!
Scruffy1
(3,533 posts)Only the house can impeach. The senate only votes to convict. personally, iI don't why this guy gets so much press. He is a totally owned useful idiot for some one.
Kashkakat v.2.0
(1,940 posts)spell it out for someone who is claiming to be a senator.