World briefs: Top Dems introduce bill to prevent U.S. from striking first with nukes
Source: Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
WASHINGTON - Legislation introduced by Democratic lawmakers in the House and Senate on Wednesday would bar the United States from using a nuclear weapon unless attacked with one first, demonstrating growing momentum for antinuclear sentiments on the left in the lead-up to the 2020 presidential election.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., a 2020 presidential contender, and Rep. Adam Smith, D-Wash., the chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, introduced the No First Use Act in their respective chambers to codify in law what they said most Americans already believe - that the United States should never initiate a nuclear war.
The text of the bill is simple, saying only that it is the policy of the United States not to use nuclear weapons first. But while the measure has support among many Democrats, and could pass through the House, it likely wouldnt win enough Republican backing to win approval in the Senate.
It would almost certainly face a veto by President Donald Trump, whose administration has opposed the proposal in its nuclear weapons policy. Still, the introduction of the bill by a high-profile presidential contender and the chairman of one of the Houses most powerful committees indicates how the idea is gaining traction within a swath of the Democratic base.
Read more: https://www.post-gazette.com/news/world/2019/01/30/World-briefs-Top-Dems-introduce-bill-prevent-US-from-striking-first-with-nukes/stories/201901310072
The article is based primarily upon an article in the Washington Post.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/top-democrats-introduce-bill-to-prevent-us-from-striking-first-with-nuclear-weapons/2019/01/30/a5959ee6-24bc-11e9-ba08-caf4ff5a3433_story.html
rampartc
(5,403 posts)but if trump throws a tantrum and pushes the button, i doubt he will be deterred by a scrap of paper.
Lonestarblue
(9,971 posts)Yesterdays public report to Congress by our nations intelligence chiefs and Trumps response that they should go back to school should cause any person loyal to this country to question either Trumps sanity or the possibility that he is working for Russia. Nothing he has done has been for the benefit of the US, so we have either a delusional president or a Russian assetneither of which is good.
Given what was said by the intelligence chiefs in public, I would love to know what they said in the afternoons private session. Senator Schumer was right with his notion that the intelligence chiefs need to meet with Trump for an intervention, but it needs to be broader. Republican leaders need to be part of this intervention and tell the president that he is risking both impeachment in the House and conviction in the Senate if he doesnt stop with his nonsensical tweets and his undermining of US intelligence and national security. Of course, they wont do this because they care more about their party than what Trump is doing to the country.
sinkingfeeling
(51,445 posts)melm00se
(4,990 posts)MAD fears.
sandensea
(21,624 posts)Cold War Spook
(1,279 posts)Nope, I hope we would never have to do it, but, at the extreme, what if our enemy is not using its nukes but chemical and biological warheads?