Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

EricMaundry

(1,619 posts)
Sun Feb 10, 2019, 07:23 PM Feb 2019

Democrat vows to move forward with impeachment, dividing his party

Source: The Hill

House Democrats are facing the prospect of another floor vote on impeaching President Trump, the first since they took control of the chamber.

Rep. Al Green (D-Texas) announced this past week that he will call for a third vote on impeachment that is sure to divide Democrats.

He previously forced House floor votes in 2017 and 2018, under a GOP-held House, that put fellow lawmakers on the record about impeachment.

This would be the first time the House would vote on impeachment under a Democratic House, and a decision to not move forward would invite criticism.

Read more: https://thehill.com/homenews/house/429216-democrat-vows-to-move-forward-with-impeachment-dividing-his-party

29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Democrat vows to move forward with impeachment, dividing his party (Original Post) EricMaundry Feb 2019 OP
Like ananda Feb 2019 #1
True..... but it's not doing any good to rush things.... there needs to be ample evidence to convict groundloop Feb 2019 #2
This would only be a vote to call for impeachment hearings, at which evidence pnwmom Feb 2019 #3
Totally agree DownriverDem Feb 2019 #7
Thank you, Rep. Al Green. NCjack Feb 2019 #4
Man times like this is when you really wish bluestarone Feb 2019 #5
well, the fascists would have tried to impeach a Dem pres for just 1/10th of what tRump did yaesu Feb 2019 #6
Divide the party? DownriverDem Feb 2019 #8
Its pretty simple. Wait for Mueller to finish his investigation before we decide to go down this ... Mr. Sparkle Feb 2019 #9
How does this serve anyone but Al Green? Jakes Progress Feb 2019 #10
Hill trying to be relavant once again. Wellstone ruled Feb 2019 #11
Yes. I agree. The 'Hill' seems to want to throw some red meat out there. YOHABLO Feb 2019 #20
Sure turning into a Right Wing Wellstone ruled Feb 2019 #21
let's not divide the party KayF Feb 2019 #12
OK, but I'm fine with impeachment. He's done plenty to justify it. mpcamb Feb 2019 #19
You only get one bite of that apple. You better have the goods. Stupid move. Lochloosa Feb 2019 #13
Let's compare 45 to Clintons transgressions Evolve Dammit Feb 2019 #14
The Senate won't convict without Mueller's report Takket Feb 2019 #23
These things must be done delicately... NurseJackie Feb 2019 #15
That post goes great with your avatar LOL Takket Feb 2019 #24
I bet it won't divide the party. Iggo Feb 2019 #16
Wait for Mueller to finish n/t TexasBushwhacker Feb 2019 #17
Oh, no. That bolsters the "witch hunt" crowd. I think they should wait for the Mueller report... Honeycombe8 Feb 2019 #18
I thought it said the Rev. Al Green.... winstars Feb 2019 #22
Here's how it goes down Jake Stern Feb 2019 #25
Not a good idea at this time in my opinion. calguy Feb 2019 #26
Speaker Pelosi customerserviceguy Feb 2019 #27
Typical Hill BS. Scruffy1 Feb 2019 #28
If we were not living in Bizzarro world, Trump would have been impeached a year ago. LiberalLovinLug Feb 2019 #29

groundloop

(13,865 posts)
2. True..... but it's not doing any good to rush things.... there needs to be ample evidence to convict
Sun Feb 10, 2019, 07:31 PM
Feb 2019

Until there is such an overwhelming amount of evidence that Senate repubs have no choice but to convict this will only be a waste of time. I have a strong feeling we'll be getting that evidence soon, but until then we need to be patient and let the repubs self-implode.

pnwmom

(110,261 posts)
3. This would only be a vote to call for impeachment hearings, at which evidence
Sun Feb 10, 2019, 07:33 PM
Feb 2019

could be carefully, thoroughly, developed.

I'm not sure this would be a bad thing.

DownriverDem

(7,015 posts)
7. Totally agree
Sun Feb 10, 2019, 07:43 PM
Feb 2019

It's important to know that the SDNY New York case could take him down sooner rather than later.

bluestarone

(22,201 posts)
5. Man times like this is when you really wish
Sun Feb 10, 2019, 07:34 PM
Feb 2019

You controlled the senate TOO!!!! I want this sooo bad but not the right time i'm afraid.

yaesu

(9,337 posts)
6. well, the fascists would have tried to impeach a Dem pres for just 1/10th of what tRump did
Sun Feb 10, 2019, 07:36 PM
Feb 2019

and they wouldn't have waited this long, probably the day he was sworn in.

DownriverDem

(7,015 posts)
8. Divide the party?
Sun Feb 10, 2019, 07:45 PM
Feb 2019

I think it's more a matter of timing. When will it do our side the most good?

Mr. Sparkle

(3,713 posts)
9. Its pretty simple. Wait for Mueller to finish his investigation before we decide to go down this ...
Sun Feb 10, 2019, 07:55 PM
Feb 2019

road, because right now it would fail in the senate and damage any near future impeachment proceedings.

 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
11. Hill trying to be relavant once again.
Sun Feb 10, 2019, 08:34 PM
Feb 2019

The DC Pundits are working overtime in order to justify their Million dollar pay stubs.

Evolve Dammit

(21,785 posts)
14. Let's compare 45 to Clintons transgressions
Sun Feb 10, 2019, 09:24 PM
Feb 2019

that set up Clinton's impeachment proceedings. It's orders of magnitude worse. He defiles the Constitution and our public institutions daily, in words and in actions. Impeach now, concurrent with the multiple investigations in progress. Congress won't invoke the 25th amendment, so impeachment is the only recourse to remove this racist, sociopath from office. Unless you want to wait... and hope.. that an independent doesn't split the vote and put him in for another 4 years. Which is what will happen if a presentable independent runs. Don't fall for the "let's wait, be patient" BS. 2 plus years is enough. We know who he is, what he represents, what he is doing, and how bought and sold he is by Putin.
Green needs co-sponsors. Call your reps. It's past time.
Sorry for previous typos.

Takket

(23,721 posts)
23. The Senate won't convict without Mueller's report
Sun Feb 10, 2019, 11:20 PM
Feb 2019

impeachment is a complete waste of time without it

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
18. Oh, no. That bolsters the "witch hunt" crowd. I think they should wait for the Mueller report...
Sun Feb 10, 2019, 10:29 PM
Feb 2019

or something conclusive from the House's investigation.

Jake Stern

(3,146 posts)
25. Here's how it goes down
Sun Feb 10, 2019, 11:21 PM
Feb 2019

House impeaches, the Senate refuses to convict and Trump gets the exoneration he seeks giving his 2020 campaign a real boost.




customerserviceguy

(25,406 posts)
27. Speaker Pelosi
Mon Feb 11, 2019, 12:13 AM
Feb 2019

will find a way to sideline this until the fruit is ripe.

"All in good time, my little pretty, all in good time."

Scruffy1

(3,534 posts)
28. Typical Hill BS.
Mon Feb 11, 2019, 05:53 AM
Feb 2019

Im peachment is already being worked on. Nadler and Schiff are in high gear. Warren has already said it. It's just not quite ready yet. I think they are close at this time even though they have only had power for a month. The house has shown no sign that they are going to surrender their responsibility to Mueller. They Democrats are not divided and nothing goes to the floor unless Pilosi wants it to. I think that at this late stage many are thinking it better not to impeach and hope he gets the 2020 nomination.

LiberalLovinLug

(14,691 posts)
29. If we were not living in Bizzarro world, Trump would have been impeached a year ago.
Mon Feb 11, 2019, 06:44 AM
Feb 2019

Any other Democratic President, Obama or a hypothetical President Hillary Clinton, would be gone by now, if they had displayed a fraction of the malfeasance of this President. Objectively...he DESERVES impeachment! Already even before Mueller's findings. Obviously. But its also political timing. I understand.

But Democrats have a history of shying away from confrontation (look forward), and (its off the table), there is a danger we wait too long. I say why not have Green and whoever else that wants to join, start their motion, even while the majority of Dems do not support it at this time. In fact it works out good that Dems cant be tied down to one way or the other as a group. Its a big tent. But it would start the narrative going in the media, it would make Donnie wet his pants again.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Democrat vows to move for...