Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,899 posts)
Mon Feb 25, 2019, 01:14 PM Feb 2019

Judges are 'appointed for life, not for eternity,' Supreme Court rules

Source: Washington Post

By Robert Barnes February 25 at 9:59 AM

“Federal judges are appointed for life, not for eternity,” the Supreme Court concluded Monday, saying the late judge Stephen Reinhardt’s vote should not have been counted in a decision issued after his death.

In an unsigned opinion, the justices sent back a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit that found a practice of the Fresno County Office of Education violated the Equal Pay Act of 1963.

Reinhardt died March 29, 2018, but the 9th Circuit counted his vote after that. He was listed as the author of an en banc decision — one made by a majority of the full court — 11 days later.

“Without Judge Reinhardt’s vote, the opinion attributed to him would have been approved by only 5 of the 10 members of the en banc panel who were still living when the decision was filed,” the opinion stated. “Although the other five living judges concurred in the judgment, they did so for different reasons. The upshot is that Judge Reinhardt’s vote made a difference.”

-snip-


Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/judges-are-appointed-for-life-not-eternity-supreme-court-rules/2019/02/25/3278a54e-390b-11e9-a2cd-307b06d0257b_story.html



Opinion of the Court: 18-272 Yovino v. Rizo
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judges are 'appointed for life, not for eternity,' Supreme Court rules (Original Post) Eugene Feb 2019 OP
So if you vote then die before an election, it should not count? Sneederbunk Feb 2019 #1
That's what it sounds like. Now the GOP has another voter suppression tool. LastLiberal in PalmSprings Feb 2019 #2
But isn't death equal? Polybius Feb 2019 #3
Seems like right-wingers take longer to die. Sneederbunk Feb 2019 #4
Aren't blacks less likely to have birth certificates in their possession LastLiberal in PalmSprings Feb 2019 #6
Don't you need a birth certificate to get into kindergarten or first grade? hedda_foil Feb 2019 #7
That's a good question. I don't have kids, so I don't know. LastLiberal in PalmSprings Feb 2019 #8
Pretty obvious difference: onenote Feb 2019 #13
Was it "decided" while he was alive but decision released after he died? onit2day Feb 2019 #5
Yes and yes. former9thward Feb 2019 #9
What was the vote breakdown? Polybius Feb 2019 #10
6-5 before, 5-5 after. Angleae Feb 2019 #11
I mean of the Supreme Court ruling Polybius Feb 2019 #12
It was an unsigned, per curiam order onenote Feb 2019 #14
Sounds right. Scalia had voted and i think he'd even written an opinion before his death. Calista241 Feb 2019 #15
2. That's what it sounds like. Now the GOP has another voter suppression tool.
Mon Feb 25, 2019, 01:45 PM
Feb 2019

Each voter must prove they are alive on election day, or their vote doesn't count.

Polybius

(15,421 posts)
3. But isn't death equal?
Mon Feb 25, 2019, 01:48 PM
Feb 2019

This can’t just help the GOP. Left-wing, right-wing or moderate, we all gotta go someday.

6. Aren't blacks less likely to have birth certificates in their possession
Mon Feb 25, 2019, 02:01 PM
Feb 2019

than whites? Unless you live in a state where having a birth certificate is required to get a driver's license, you need to show you were officially born. Plus, not having a way to get to the polling place on Election Day because of a lack of private transportation has been an ongoing problem for many blacks, who use public transportation.

I just think the GOP will seize on the ruling to keep minorities from voting.

I started this part of the thread sarcastically -- now I'm not so sure.

hedda_foil

(16,375 posts)
7. Don't you need a birth certificate to get into kindergarten or first grade?
Mon Feb 25, 2019, 04:17 PM
Feb 2019

They're still pretty strict about their birthday cut off dates for starting school.

8. That's a good question. I don't have kids, so I don't know.
Mon Feb 25, 2019, 07:46 PM
Feb 2019

The best "proof of life" information I could find was a 2006 study cited by AG Eric Holden, who stated: "[R]ecent studies indicate that nationally, only 8 percent of white voting-age citizens but 25 percent of African-American voting-age citizens lack government-issued photo IDs." Politifact

I wasn't being serious when I said the SCOTUS decision that, "You have to be alive to vote," would have any effect on elections, but the more I think about it, the more I believe the voter suppression people would jump on this as another obstacle to keep minorities and others who might favor Democratic candidates from voting.

Isn't that the whole purpose of voter suppression?

onenote

(42,704 posts)
13. Pretty obvious difference:
Tue Feb 26, 2019, 01:55 PM
Feb 2019

You can't change your vote after it has been cast.

But a judge can change his or her mind up to the point where the decision is released.

former9thward

(32,013 posts)
9. Yes and yes.
Mon Feb 25, 2019, 07:58 PM
Feb 2019

The theory is that the judge could have changed his mind before the decision was actually released.

Calista241

(5,586 posts)
15. Sounds right. Scalia had voted and i think he'd even written an opinion before his death.
Tue Feb 26, 2019, 02:00 PM
Feb 2019

And the opinion was re-written by another Justice and his vote nullified.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judges are 'appointed for...