Rick Santorum Says "Smart People Will Never Be On Our Side"
Source: BuzzFeed
WASHINGTON, DC Former presidential candidate Rick Santorum attacked the media and "smart people" for not being on the side of conservatives in a speech to the Values Voter Summit on Saturday.
"We will never have the media on our side, ever, in this country," Santorum, a former Pennsylvania senator, told the audience at the Omni Shoreham hotel. "We will never have the elite, smart people on our side."
The media "doesn't like the other side," Santorum said. "And not necessarily, I would argue, because they agree with them, but because they can influence the country.
"If just a few people make decisions about what this world looks like, what this country looks like, then you have people sitting in offices at major media outlets and Hollywood who think they can deal with a small group of people, to get them to jump through the hoops they want you to," Santorum said.
-snip-
Read more: http://www.buzzfeed.com/rosiegray/rick-santorum-says-smart-people-will-never-be-on
ChairmanAgnostic
(28,017 posts)Don't you know that prayer solves all problems? Unless you didn't prey hard enough, which then makes it your fault.
What an idiot.
savannah43
(575 posts)Either way, it's a thing of beauty.
Cha
(297,154 posts)seems to me..all they do is "prey".
ChairmanAgnostic
(28,017 posts)Sivafae
(480 posts)tavalon
(27,985 posts)A thing of beauty.
Flashmann
(2,140 posts)Holy Moly!!....Does this mean Senator Shitsmear has a fingernails grasp of a clue?......
calimary
(81,220 posts)sanctimonium will have to stick to the dumb shits, but unfortunately they are legion.
Flashmann
(2,140 posts)On Shitsmears part,that smart folks will never be on his,(their),side,signify his having a grasp of reality,however tenuous,or temporary?
savannah43
(575 posts)I think we can all assume that he was not working from a Rovian script. Or maybe he just forgot his lines. Even my cats burst out laughing.
calimary
(81,220 posts)I just do not get these people. I just don't get anyone who thinks contraception is basically wrong. Just don't get it. I know why they think such things. Just don't get the "logic" or "reasoning." Mainly because THERE ISN'T ANY!!!!!!!!!!!
It isn't as if I were defending or even commending Senator Shitstain..I Merely intended to comment on the irony,that a sack of excrement,such as him,would voice such a truth,however accidental...It isn't even earthshattering that he did so.After all,what he said is glaringly obvious to anyone possessing an IQ higher than the wattage of a refridgerator light bulb...
savannah43
(575 posts)and the Mittens campaign respond. It's Saturday and Rove and Ailes are having their weekly feast of roasted Somali orphans. It will be interesting to see who covers for "Bush's Brain" and Murdoch's enforcer on the weekend shift.
formercia
(18,479 posts)The proof is in the Pudding, as they say.
Rambis
(7,774 posts)renaissanceguy
(1,729 posts)You know the saying. Their party thrives on people who can't think for themselves. That's probably 78% of their demographic.
http://www.cafepress.com/liberalissues
avebury
(10,952 posts)Tomay
(58 posts)Was this a Freudian slip, or a conscious slap at intelligent people? My money's on the latter. The right wing has hated intellectuals since the 1930s at least. In their eyes it's better to be dumb and full of blind faith than smart with a questioning mind.
calimary
(81,220 posts)They hate smart people because they know smart people can figure them out and won't fall for their bullshit. I believe it was kkkarl rove who once said "too much education is not necessarily a good thing." That was because the better educated one is, the more likely one is to be liberal in his/her thinking. It's BROADENING the mind that they fear. They like minds nice and narrow, and closed, and pinched.
dotymed
(5,610 posts)has lived with mom all of his life, never voted, loves Joel Olsteen....say's "ignorance is bliss." And he lives by that reasoning(?).
savannah43
(575 posts)What if the 1% decide that they no longer need or desire to suffer the rest of us living? How would they eliminate us? Toxic corporate food? Bad pharmaceuticals? Polluting the environment? Taking away the social safety nets? Wait a minute...
Octafish
(55,745 posts)...in the open.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002145466
William Seger
(10,778 posts)This "movement" makes no bones about being anti-intellectual.
Volaris
(10,270 posts)sounds like a direct challenge to the Republican Party "Establishment", who have been so effectivley using and abusing the STUPID-faithful people in this country to get themselves elected for 30 years...sounds like Rick has had enough of being a dupe, too bad he missed the point...as in, if you don't want your "dumb" abused on a national level, maybe you should try being a lil bit smarter...but OH NO, we're just going to keep on, keeping on, and it's YOU ALL who should just abide by our stoopid, and do what we say...
It's now on the Record, he's a self-professed idiot, and PROUD of that fact, and he ain't EVER going to change for the likes of getting elected. This is a GOOD THING for American politics, because it means the final destruction of the Reagan Coalition will begin in earnest in November, 2012. It's about damn time.
treestar
(82,383 posts)We all joke about his finally getting a clue, but then remember their anti-intellectualism. But then Senator Stupid was in-artful in his expression of it. We know he means to insult the "elite" and the "smart" but it didn't come out well.
mountain grammy
(26,619 posts)monmouth
(21,078 posts)DonViejo
(60,536 posts)calimary
(81,220 posts)Glad you're here! We need you - AND your brain!
Now get to work.
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)Thank the heavens SMART people are smart LOL
alp227
(32,019 posts)(Try not to read with a dirty mind, considering the alt def of Santorum.)
treestar
(82,383 posts)He just inadvertently admitted that blah people are smarter than Republicans. Interesting.
eppur_se_muova
(36,260 posts)WCGreen
(45,558 posts)probably meant the "smart" set, which was a derogatory way to describe the New York liberals when it was no longer Kosher to call them pointy headed intellectuals.
I knew he had a 1950's mindset but to channel that decades barbs means he might not be all there anymore.
Flashmann
(2,140 posts)AnyMORE?..........Really?......
Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)After all, everyone knows it's Teh Joooos that control Hollywood and Wall Street.
Baitball Blogger
(46,700 posts)Response to highplainsdem (Original post)
bupkus This message was self-deleted by its author.
beac
(9,992 posts)Because you have to be an idiot to vote Republican,
HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)if the smart people won't join his side. Ok, Little Ricky, I can agree that you and your people are stupid.
xxqqqzme
(14,887 posts)nodding in agreement don't realize he just insulted them.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)calimary
(81,220 posts)Notice: if it were the "just a few people" like the koch brothers and shel adelson and foster friese and other human opportunistic infections, he'd have no problem with it.
But they're correct about one thing: smart people will NEVER side with sanctimonium. Smart people know, understand, and appreciate things like knowledge and science and logic and reason and reality. Smart people can have faith AND reality-based knowledge that governs their decisions. Smart people understand the whole concept of shades of gray rather than assuming the world is simplistically black-or-white. Smart people do nuance. Idiots don't even understand the word - or they're proudly against it like one of their heroes, george w. idiot.
Freddie
(9,262 posts)Just looked out the window and saw flying pigs.
goclark
(30,404 posts)10 ft., 20ft., 40?
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)WallaceRitchie
(242 posts)[IMG][/IMG]
calimary
(81,220 posts)I saw the headline and thought - No DUH!!!
Glad you're here! We need you!
Now get to work.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)"the smart people" ? too funny
ellie
(6,929 posts)lunatica
(53,410 posts)davidn3600
(6,342 posts)TexasBushwhacker
(20,175 posts)TexasBushwhacker
(20,175 posts)After all, this is the guy who called Obama a snob for wanting everyone to be able to go to college. They don't want that because college makes more LIBERALS.
mother earth
(6,002 posts)Nay
(12,051 posts)xocet
(3,871 posts)Amonester
(11,541 posts)Corporate New Neandertals & Co aren't on their side????
WOW!
socialindependocrat
(1,372 posts)It's a bunch of people at the top who "preach" down to the lesser people and get the people to think what the hierarchy wants them to think.
What is the conservative right trying to do but get the country to
obey the laws and beliefs of the conservative church.
Huh, Sanitorium?
That's what you were trying to do to the country!
Freedom to think!
Freedom to act!
Freedom to seek happiness!
Response to socialindependocrat (Reply #30)
bupkus This message was self-deleted by its author.
fasttense
(17,301 posts)sakabatou
(42,149 posts)louis-t
(23,292 posts)Supersedeas
(20,630 posts)Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)That was my take on it anyway. And I have to be correct, because I am not on Santorum's side and he just said I was smart.
siligut
(12,272 posts)They can't let this stand.
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)These extreme right zealots blame everyone -- except themselves -- for the unpopularity and rejection of their insane views.
It's the media's fault.
It's Barack Obama's fault.
It's the liberal's fault.
These people are the biggest bunch of whiney candy asses ever to grace this country.
If you want to have extremist, unpopular, frightening views that are inconsistent with rational thought, wisdom and basic human decency. FINE! Have at it!
But don't blame the frickin world when we don't glom on to your rancid stupidity.
These people are a bunch of babies.
emmadoggy
(2,142 posts)I completely agree with you. Well said.
Iris
(15,652 posts)fxmakeupguy
(9 posts)Great post, CoffeeCat! It's ALWAYS everyone else's fault when they don't get their way. Meanwhile, we Dems and libs take the high road. Last time one of ours got re-elected, they tried impeachment. Who knows what they'll try THIS time. They are, without a doubt, the Party of Sore Losers. If they're in power -- WATCH OUT! They grab all they can, run roughshod over everything and everyone and do whatever they want to do. But when they are NOT holding ALL the levers of power, they will do everything they can to gum up the works and then blame it on us. We "smart people" need to start pointing that out to the rest of the people who aren't paying close enough attention!
tawadi
(2,110 posts)DesertRat
(27,995 posts)mimi85
(1,805 posts)especially the Dumbfuckistan post.
nolabear
(41,959 posts)Oh, and we're the greatest country on Earth and we're tops in innovation and we have the best medical system in the world and, well, DAMN those smart people!
What do you DO with that, except vote smart.
VOTE FOR THE SMART GUY.
rjlobo422
(29 posts)I always knew there was a reason I liked you Rick. You are such a straight shooter. You make my world so understandable. Who needs those nerdy minority and gay lovers anyway. Who the hell needs shit like truth, honesty, compassion, tolerance and reason. That shit just clouds my worldview anyway. And hey, the next time I see a cute girl walking down the street, I'll already know what is happening under her skirt.....you have already legislated it, right?
I need another cup of coffee and a bowl...what an asshole.
bucolic_frolic
(43,137 posts)If the smart people will never be on your side?
You just admitted you're on the side of dumb people
and that means you are dumb also.
Rick, this is not something to boast about.
Response to highplainsdem (Original post)
darkangel218 This message was self-deleted by its author.
LisaL
(44,973 posts)Mz Pip
(27,439 posts)we should all be governed by stupid people. That will solve everything!
ElboRuum
(4,717 posts)You're goddamn right about that Ricky.
And for very good fucking reason.
Seniorcousin
(16 posts)This explains the religious right's views on education and science.
LisaL
(44,973 posts)Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)Doesn't matter anymore. Just more lies about the "liberal media". He's right about the smart people though. Poor little Ricky with his pity party.
busterbrown
(8,515 posts)Cha
(297,154 posts)like he spilled the beans though.
tandot
(6,671 posts)I bet those idiots gave him a standing ovation for being called stupid
sarcasmo
(23,968 posts)kurtzapril4
(1,353 posts)He was pretty fucking smart.....
savannah43
(575 posts)This current group has perverted Buckley's party. It's like Satan took it over.
kurtzapril4
(1,353 posts)I was just stating that Santorum was wrong, there are/were some very educated, erudite conservatives. They usually can't out-shout the crazy, though.
sofa king
(10,857 posts)For all the crap he spewed in his last years, trying to distinguish himself as a capital "c" conservative over the army of homonculi he helped to create, Buckley's political opinions were usually almost entirely reactionary.
He didn't have an opinion unless liberals provided one for him to twist into his own pretzel. And then he choked when he and his heroes had to eat them.
Buckley died bitter and disillusioned, disappointed with the amoral, dysfunctional world he had toiled so assiduously to forge. But he would have railed against President Obama every week, because President Obama would have provided him with actual policies from which he could bounce his "no it's not" ideology.
And that, in a nutshell, was Bill Buckley: sophistry, not substance. He and Mitt would have been peas in a pod.
grantcart
(53,061 posts)Octafish
(55,745 posts)benld74
(9,904 posts)DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)...is some kind of Political Peter Principle where people in general and politicians in particular are only capable of ''rising to their level of incompetence.''
- He's describing Teabagger Utopia.
K&R
DainBramaged
(39,191 posts)talk about stupid...
iemitsu
(3,888 posts)i don't think he is implying that the audience is not smart but that they belong to a faction of smarts and that the other smarts are competing with them to create reality (the ultimate power rush).
firstly, he admits, that man (in fact a very few men) creates reality. this is interesting since the version of reality he promotes highlights the vital roll of religion.
according to santorium there are three groups of elites competing for the power to create reality. conservatives, who envision a reality based on church and home, the media, which (i think he's saying) supports the vision of big government/business, and hollywood which wants to see a reality which includes gay people (i'm being sarcastic here but suspect he would include them along with the list of evil freedoms that hollywood might promote).
evidently, santorium does not consider anyone who does not try to influence or control others to be smart.
unfortunately for santoruim, he also implies in this argument, that 2/3rds of the smart people in the country do not agree with or support the vision that he and the "values voters" promote.
i wonder how he explains that to himself? is it all really about power?
ed: for clarity
Bernardo de La Paz
(48,999 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Turbineguy
(37,320 posts)he's a republican.
oldsarge54
(582 posts)Or at least explains a lot about how the Republicans view their own supporters. This is nothing new, Ike was proud to be "middlebrow." There seems to be a cachet among Republicans that scientists, actors, writers, musicians and all that "high brow" stuff is the province of Democrats and commies (and the phrase of the time, fellow travelers.) As for Rick's second accusation, about dealing with a small group of people controlling things, don't you think that boardrooms, Alec and other such groups are doing the same thing?
piltdownman
(5 posts)During his years in office in PA and during his run for Prez, Rick said a lot of crazy stuff...but he was always held
back by the fact that he had to get re-elected.
Fast forward.
He no longer has to worry about that, 'cause he'll never get elected to anything, ever again.
So...now he apparently feels free to spout off even crazier shit to his nutball base. I have rarely seen a pol
who is so in need of affirmation. He SO needs to be paid attention to, just like a cranky, whiny 7 year old,
which apparently is his mental age.
And, has anyone mentioned to Rick that "the media" are not, at least technically, not supposed to "take sides?"
Also, hasn't he noticed that most of the major media outlets are run by the same rapacious corporate CEOs
that all vote Republican?
His speech was, at the end of the day, simply meant as an easy applause line for the numbskulls at this
convention, but it is a new low, even for Ricky!
Pilt
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)What - is this man trying to put us out of a JOB???
WRH2
(87 posts)It's the 100 million who are not connected to the internet that they get as much traction as they do.The rest of us can see the
game
cr8tvlde
(1,185 posts)now what do we do, boss?
Kablooie
(18,628 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)The GOP rallying cry: "Close the coffin!"
Botany
(70,501 posts)"If just a few people make decisions about what this world looks like, what this country looks like,
then you have people sitting in offices at major media outlets and Hollywood who think they can
deal with a small group of people, to get them to jump through the hoops they want you to,"
Santorum said.
BTW if the liberal media and the Jews are running everything can they please come on out and
tell the world about Ohio 2004?
sendero
(28,552 posts)... "liberal media" screed. There is no liberal media and there hasn't been since around the mid 90s.
newspeak
(4,847 posts)for approximately thirty fekkin years they've been talking about the liberal media. "The media is as a liberal as their conservative corporate owners allow them to be." they've shoved fabricating hate spewers like limpballs, o'llielly, the wacky beck and hannity--hoping that their audience has been dumbed down enough to believe their shite.
no more discourse-debate-with real facts. No we've got the obscene talking heads who cut microphones when they don't like what their hearing or they're losing the debate. That's the present discourse in the good old USA.
maybe he thinks that he can dumb down the plebes enough, so the neocons can have themselves a nice little dictatorship, with them being the dictator, of course (words from little boots).
before goldwater died, he was very disappointed of the direction the repug party was going. I'm wondering how many old repugs are rolling in their graves. at least some of them had some decency and brains (exclude mccarthy, nixon, atwater).
yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)This is wedge politics, with (from his perspective) the wedge driven in the right place. When he disparages "elite, smart people" he's embracing the working class.
We better represent the working class but do a poor job of communicating it. They do a poor job of representing the working class, but do an excellent job of obfuscating that reality.
ronnie624
(5,764 posts)Pure gibberish.
StevePaulson
(174 posts)I read a great article about why smart people will never be with conservatives at http://www.republicansareadisease.com Smart people don't like liars, homophobes, vote suppressors etc.
Mr. Ass Juice is what they call him. Fitting.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)verges
(1,936 posts)he meant "smart" as in intelligent. In context, it seems to me, he meant "smart " as in stylish. As in "the smart set". I surmise this because of the way he linked it with "elite." And even Santorum isn't stupid enough to say or even think his base isn't smart(intelligent). Even if their not..
LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)Know the important concept of CRITICAL THINKING instead of following blindly like wayward sleep without investigating outside resources (besides the MSM) to gain point of views on a political manner. Sorry Rick that you and your wayward sleep at the Voter Values Conference did not learn this in elementary school.
BadGimp
(4,015 posts)he does not even see the reverse irony of his own words
sad
patricia92243
(12,595 posts)elbloggoZY27
(283 posts)This Country was founded on the principle of Free Speech. It has nothing to do with intelligence.
Over the course of this particular Administration and Congress I have heard some of the worst comments by some of the savviest of Politicians, Analysts, Columnists and just regular citizens.
The way I see it is that we are one Country with a grand mix of human beings that have some very common foreign enemies and that was confirmed when our Consulates in the Middle East & Africa were attacked and our Citizens Murdered.
Commenting on Conservatism has been Trumped by the present World Situation which has turned quite ugly. I think in my opinion we Americans no matter what Party we vote for should stand up as one against some really dangerous people who obviously hate us.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)47of74
(18,470 posts)....the reason smart people aren't on the side of the conservatives is because we see right through the lies and the bullshit.
obxhead
(8,434 posts)The "media" is supposed to report the facts and deliver news, not to pick a side and swing the population to a particular view.
Chemisse
(30,809 posts)Or a greedy bastard. But since most of your party is just plain dumb, they don't understand about the greedy bastards, so it's all good.
polichick
(37,152 posts)jmowreader
(50,555 posts)In Idiocracy, Frito was discussing the Time Machine..."it breaks down all the time 'cause some smart guy made it a long time ago." "Smart guy" was pronounced with a real nasty sneer.
LeftishBrit
(41,205 posts)Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)If a Democratic pol had said something similar about the "red state/low information voter" -crowd, the media would have happily knocked Romney off as lead story and dove in with both barrels blazing...