Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Richard D

(8,752 posts)
Sun May 26, 2019, 05:46 AM May 2019

Peru earthquake: Huge 8.0 magnitude earthquake hits central Peru

Source: Express UK

The temor hit at 8.41am UK time in the Pacaua Samiria National Reserve Park. The quake struck around 180 km east of the town on of Moyobamba, the capital of the San Martín region in northern Peru, according to the US Geological Survey (USGS). It is also understood to have reached a depth of around 105 km.

The quake has caused severe damage across Peru, which has seen the collapse of a road and buildings caving in.

Pictures show debris falling from highrise buliding as the tremours cause structures to shake.

The earthquake was originally registered as a 7.5 magnitude tremor, but has since been upgraded to a 8.0 quake on the Richter Scale.

Read more: https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1132208/earthquake-peru-today-latest-update-USGS-magnitude-8-tsunami-warning-centre-lacunas



It's affected Peru, Brazil, Ecuador and Bolivia. This was a monster quake.
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Peru earthquake: Huge 8.0 magnitude earthquake hits central Peru (Original Post) Richard D May 2019 OP
That is going to leave a mark. Lochloosa May 2019 #1
Fortunately most of that area is jungle Richard D May 2019 #2
People in the jungle matter too. milestogo May 2019 #3
The post you replied to does not imply in the slightest that they don't matter Bernardo de La Paz May 2019 #4
Falling trees on fragil huts vs concret.... Maxheader May 2019 #5
Of course there are many ways to die or be injured. "Just saying..." :eyes: . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz May 2019 #11
Of course, not what I meant. Richard D May 2019 #6
Just checked. Richard D May 2019 #7
It will be very difficult for aid to reach people in such areas. milestogo May 2019 #8
Jungle people are resourceful Richard D May 2019 #10
Obviously, meadowlander May 2019 #16
Pray for Peru. Power 2 the People May 2019 #9
Vibes to the people of Peru. applegrove May 2019 #12
well, luckily the depth of the quake was 68 miles IcyPeas May 2019 #13
The only 8 point or above earthquakes locks May 2019 #14
Depends how you crunch the numbers.... Brother Buzz May 2019 #15

Richard D

(8,752 posts)
2. Fortunately most of that area is jungle
Sun May 26, 2019, 05:50 AM
May 2019

People live in simple huts. Waiting to hear reports from the bigger cities where concrete block structures are common.

Bernardo de La Paz

(48,988 posts)
4. The post you replied to does not imply in the slightest that they don't matter
Sun May 26, 2019, 08:06 AM
May 2019

It was simply pointing out that due to the nature of the structures in different areas there is less likely to be unrepairable structure damage in the jungle than in urban areas. Almost all structures built by the people in the jungle who matter will be repairable if damaged.

When there is unrepairable structure damage there are likely to be severe injuries and maybe deaths.

Richard D

(8,752 posts)
6. Of course, not what I meant.
Sun May 26, 2019, 10:03 AM
May 2019

Population density in the jungle is very small.
Structures are single story open wood huts. Wood moves with the earth, so structural damage is unlikely.
I doubt trees will fall from a quake like that, and if they did, most villages are cleared from trees. I'd be more worried about a stron wind.
Towns in Peru usually have 2 or three story concrete block construction and a greater population density. So more likely to be a problem there.

Fortunately, so far, it looks like damage in the area is minimal. Still waiting to hear from friends who live in that area, but no fatalities or injuries reported yet.

milestogo

(16,829 posts)
8. It will be very difficult for aid to reach people in such areas.
Sun May 26, 2019, 10:13 AM
May 2019

So people who survive the quake may not survive the aftermath.

meadowlander

(4,394 posts)
16. Obviously,
Mon May 27, 2019, 05:26 PM
May 2019

but if you have to have an 8.0 quake better the epicentre be where hundreds of people live in low level buildings and not tens of millions in skyscrapers.

We're hopefully not going to see scenes like we did with the 8.0 2008 Sichuan quake which killed 70,000 people and injured 350,000+ and where whole school buildings pancaked killing all the kids inside.

I've been in a 7.1 quake where the epicentre was shallow and under a major urban area and that shit is *bad* news.

IcyPeas

(21,857 posts)
13. well, luckily the depth of the quake was 68 miles
Sun May 26, 2019, 03:27 PM
May 2019

this matters. Quakes closer to the surface cause more damage. e.g. the 1994 Northridge earthquake was about 6 miles in depth and caused massive surface damage.

So far there is 1 fatality.

https://www.businessinsider.com/ap-ap-explains-difference-between-shallow-deep-earthquakes-2016-8

Brother Buzz

(36,412 posts)
15. Depends how you crunch the numbers....
Mon May 27, 2019, 03:55 PM
May 2019

The 1906 San Francisco earthquake happened before the Richter magnitude scale was devised, but for decades, the eggheads believed it was an 8.6 quake.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Peru earthquake: Huge 8.0...