Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jpak

(41,757 posts)
Fri Jun 14, 2019, 09:38 AM Jun 2019

'Flying Object' Struck Tanker in Gulf of Oman, Operator Says, Not a Mine

Source: New York Times

TOKYO — One of the tankers that were attacked in the Gulf of Oman was struck by a flying object, the ship’s Japanese operator said on Friday, disputing at least part of the account of United States officials who had blamed Iran for the attack.

“Our crew said that the ship was attacked by a flying object,” said Yutaka Katada, the president of the operator, Kokuka Sangyo.

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said on Thursday that American intelligence agencies had concluded that Tehran was behind the disabling of two tankers in the Gulf of Oman, a vital conduit for much of the world’s oil. Senior American officials had already blamed Iran for similar attacks last month against four tankers in the same area. Iranian officials denied any involvement in the events, which have escalated tensions in the region.

In an interview broadcast on Friday by “Fox & Friends,” President Trump directly accused Tehran, saying, “Iran did do it.”

<more>





Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/14/world/middleeast/oil-tanker-attack-gulf-oman.html



The article has the DoD video of the boat and "limpet mine"

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
'Flying Object' Struck Tanker in Gulf of Oman, Operator Says, Not a Mine (Original Post) jpak Jun 2019 OP
A UFO Bayard Jun 2019 #1
I think Iran is covered by the bi-partisan "war on terror" bill they passed way back. LiberalArkie Jun 2019 #3
Yes, both houses of Congress sarisataka Jun 2019 #6
I guess that could be covered by tRump declaring it a national emergency Bayard Jun 2019 #9
He wouldn't even need an EO sarisataka Jun 2019 #10
The US hasn't declared war since WWII Cal Carpenter Jun 2019 #12
It was Aliens! DBoon Jun 2019 #15
sounds like they have 2naSalit Jun 2019 #2
We don't know what hit the ship, Ramsey Barner Jun 2019 #4
Or alternately sarisataka Jun 2019 #7
Bolton is determined to finish what he & the PNAC started under Bush. CaptainTruth Jun 2019 #5
Kudos for Reminding us about PNAC McKim Jun 2019 #11
Contrary to Pompous ass's story Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jun 2019 #8
Jesus Christ! How many times do they think people are gonna buy this shit? Midnight Writer Jun 2019 #13
Some of us are aware bdamomma Jun 2019 #14

Bayard

(22,069 posts)
1. A UFO
Fri Jun 14, 2019, 10:31 AM
Jun 2019

Pompeo/tRump/Bolton won't let the absence of factual proof keep them from going to war.

This is sounding far too much like the Iraq lead up. Do both houses of Congress have to approve a declaration of war?

sarisataka

(18,648 posts)
6. Yes, both houses of Congress
Fri Jun 14, 2019, 10:51 AM
Jun 2019

Have to approve a declaration of war.

Do you believe such a declaration is needed prior to any action?

Bayard

(22,069 posts)
9. I guess that could be covered by tRump declaring it a national emergency
Fri Jun 14, 2019, 11:38 AM
Jun 2019

Executive order, you know. Don't need no stinkin' Congress!

sarisataka

(18,648 posts)
10. He wouldn't even need an EO
Fri Jun 14, 2019, 12:06 PM
Jun 2019

Presidents back to Jefferson have used their authority as CinC to use military force without asking Congress to declare war.

The US has only "officially" fought in five wars.

Cal Carpenter

(4,959 posts)
12. The US hasn't declared war since WWII
Fri Jun 14, 2019, 02:42 PM
Jun 2019

Not Iraq (any time), Afghanistan, Vietnam, Korea, Philippines, or any other number of places we've occupied and used military action...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_of_war_by_the_United_States

Ramsey Barner

(349 posts)
4. We don't know what hit the ship,
Fri Jun 14, 2019, 10:48 AM
Jun 2019

or what the ship hit, or actually anything factual about the incident, other than
IRAN DID IT!!!

sarisataka

(18,648 posts)
7. Or alternately
Fri Jun 14, 2019, 10:53 AM
Jun 2019

We don't know what hit the ship,

or what the ship hit, or actually anything factual about the incident, other than 
IRAN DIDN'T DO IT!!!


Just about everyone is in knee jerk mode.

CaptainTruth

(6,591 posts)
5. Bolton is determined to finish what he & the PNAC started under Bush.
Fri Jun 14, 2019, 10:49 AM
Jun 2019

The PNAC (Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Bolton etc) wanted to invade Iran too but got bogged down in Iraq.

Sadly, I predicted this the day Bolton joined the administration. My exact words to my wife were "Oh shit, now Bolton is going to start a war with Iran." This should be obvious to every American, the PNAC didn't hide it, their papers were published publicly, but our press wasn't paying attention then & they're still not paying attention now.

My Twitter tags if anyone wants to use them: #WMDejaVu #FakeWar #Iran

[link:https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Project_for_the_New_American_Century|

McKim

(2,412 posts)
11. Kudos for Reminding us about PNAC
Fri Jun 14, 2019, 01:17 PM
Jun 2019

Thanks for the reminder about PNAC. These evil men will not stop until the entire Middle East is in flames! They belong in prison for all the death and destruction they have caused. We can’t let them win!

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»'Flying Object' Struck Ta...