Mulvaney on shaky ground in wake of whistleblower fallout, sources say
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by Omaha Steve (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).
Source: CNN
(CNN)Acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney is on shaky ground in the wake of a bad week for President Trump, according to multiple sources with knowledge of discussions surrounding the whistleblower fallout.
The sources say the President is not upset with Mulvaney for the White House releasing the summary of his July 25 call with Ukraine's leader or the whistleblower complaint because he had been convinced that it was necessary.
What Trump and other aides are frustrated with, according to the sources, is that Mulvaney did not have a strategy for defending and explaining the contents of those documents as soon as they were publicly released.
One of the sources says it's not just the President, but also widespread frustration in the White House about the lack of a response plan to deal with the fallout after the release of the whistleblower complaint ignited more controversy surrounding the President. The sources say Mulvaney is taking the heat for that.
Read more: https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/28/politics/mick-mulvaney-impeachment-inquiry-donald-trump/index.html
bucolic_frolic
(55,141 posts)in a past life he must have been the executioner
Vinca
(53,994 posts)known what it said. And remember . . . this is just a summary. 11 minutes of 30. The White House has voice recognition software for the transcriptionists so the whole thing must be on audio somewhere - probably in a vault at Fort Knox and guarded by a squad of heavily-armed goons.
sandensea
(23,343 posts)They should put on a play by now - in Ft. Leavenworth.
flibbitygiblets
(7,220 posts)Because, leadership and accountability.
Bernardo de La Paz
(60,320 posts)True Dough
(26,667 posts)He's far more convincing than most of Trump's sycophants. Mick can talk a good and convincing game. I don't buy what he's selling but he has surely persuaded some rubes.
tanyev
(49,296 posts)I think that philosophy is reaching its inevitable conclusion.
TeamPooka
(25,577 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(106,212 posts)There was me thinking Mulvaney's trouble is that he's implicated in the illegality:
In a letter to acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney and acting Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought, Budget Chairman John Yarmuth and Appropriations Chairwoman Nita M. Lowey said they are concerned OMB actions that withheld military aid to Ukraine constitute unlawful impoundments in violation of the landmark 1974 budget law.
https://www.rollcall.com/news/congress/democratic-committee-leaders-demand-budget-documents-related-ukraine-aid-holdup
No, apparently it's fine to break the law, just not fine to not have excuses for Trump breaking the law ...
yaesu
(9,328 posts)Jedi Guy
(3,477 posts)The best (term used extremely loosely) argument they've been able to muster thus far is, "Trump didn't use the words 'quid pro quo' so clearly it wasn't a quid pro quo. He has to say those exact words for that to be the case." It's laughable.
Trump could resign with the understanding that Pence would pardon him. But Pence, of course, knows he'd be the one in the hot seat in that event, and you know neither one trusts the other to look out for him. They must be shipping Tums to the White House by the crate these days.
sheshe2
(97,629 posts)Hard to defend the indefensible. His words, plain as the nose on his face.
These people that he surrounds himself with? They are as stupid as he is. He claims to hire the best of the best...best what, morons?
IthinkThereforeIAM
(3,307 posts)... for this team? It sure would appear so to me.
marble falls
(71,926 posts)cstanleytech
(28,473 posts)KPN
(17,377 posts)...?)
Better find one of those spider holes Saddam hid in soon fat ass. Were coming for you.
AKing
(511 posts)Guy Whitey Corngood
(26,848 posts)Omaha Steve
(109,229 posts)Opinions from multiple unnamed sources about shaky ground for Mulvaney are not LBN.
Statement of Purpose
Post the latest news from reputable mainstream news websites and blogs. Important news of national interest only. No analysis or opinion pieces. No duplicates. News stories must have been published within the last 12 hours. Use the published title of the story as the title of the discussion thread.