House passes resolution condemning Trump's decision to withdraw U.S. military from northern Syria
Source: Washington Post
President Trump tried Wednesday to distance the United States from the escalating chaos in northern Syria following the withdrawal of nearly all U.S. troops in the region dismissing U.S.-allied Kurdish fighters as no angels as the outrage over his decision to pull American forces continued to grow on Capitol Hill.
In remarks in the Oval Office, Trump insisted that the ongoing conflict was between Turkey and Syria rather than among Turkey and Syria and the United States comments that provoked a fresh round of criticism from congressional Republicans who have said Trumps decision to withdraw troops allowed the Turkish incursion last week into northern Syria. Theyre no angels. Theyre no angels. Go back and take a look, Trump said as he sat alongside Italian President Sergio Mattarella, whom the White House was hosting for a visit Wednesday. Trump insisted that the Kurds would be fine because they know how to fight.
<...>
Separately, the House adopted a resolution on a 354 to 60 vote with four Republicans members voting present that rebuked Trumps move to pull U.S. troops out of northern Syria a decision announced Oct. 6 that has found few defenders on Capitol Hill. The strategy is meant to force Trump to sign or veto legislation that scolded his own decision, although Senate Republican leaders have yet to publicly commit to taking up that bill.
Alliances and values are important, said Rep. John Shimkus (R-Ill.) speaking out on the House floor. Walking away from friends is a sad indication of policy that we don't want to support, we don't want to condone. Yes, we want America to be great, but we're also great because of our friends and our allies. Coalitions are not bad. Coalitions strengthen our public policy around the world.
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-tries-to-distance-us-from-chaos-in-syria-says-kurdish-allies-are-no-angels/2019/10/16/7b6c5ac8-f037-11e9-b2da-606ba1ef30e3_story.html
Original article -
The vote in the House came shortly before congressional leaders met at the White House with Trump on Syria.
This is a developing story. It will be updated.
saidsimplesimon
(7,888 posts)before it reaches the floor. Mitch's rules, no Senator to speak, just what, a vote to kill the bill?
yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)Although a Senator could introduce it in the Senate I suppose.
saidsimplesimon
(7,888 posts)Perseus
(4,341 posts)If/when they vote against it, then let the World know of republicans treasonous action, and pound it every time they can.
BumRushDaShow
(128,859 posts)All members of the House GOP leadership team were among the 129 Republicans who supported the resolution. A few notable Republican members opposed it, including the leaders of the pro-Trump House Freedom Caucus; Rep. Tom Reed (N.Y.), co-chair of the bipartisan Problem Solvers Caucus; and Rep. Greg Pence (Ind.), the vice presidents brother.
The House strategy is meant to force Trump to sign or veto legislation that scolded his own decision, although Senate Republican leaders have yet to publicly commit to taking up that bill.
Alliances and values are important, said Rep. John Shimkus (R-Ill.) speaking out on the House floor. Walking away from friends is a sad indication of policy that we don't want to support, we don't want to condone. Yes, we want America to be great, but we're also great because of our friends and our allies. Coalitions are not bad. Coalitions strengthen our public policy around the world.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-tries-to-distance-us-from-chaos-in-syria-says-kurdish-allies-are-no-angels/2019/10/16/7b6c5ac8-f037-11e9-b2da-606ba1ef30e3_story.html
It's possible that someone like Romney would make the attempt but naturally it is up to Turtle.
Rebl2
(13,492 posts)walking away from friends-allies? Hes been doing this the last two and half years! Why are you just now speaking up?
BumRushDaShow
(128,859 posts)there are a few others complaining too so he can hide within the group.
BumRushDaShow
(128,859 posts)so it may have some support in the Senate as well.... It's just a resolution for a condemnation but has no legislative remedies associated with it.
Perseus
(4,341 posts)It should worry the creature.
BumRushDaShow
(128,859 posts)although it does sortof serve as a shot across the bow so to speak.
question everything
(47,470 posts)olegramps
(8,200 posts)beachbumbob
(9,263 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,859 posts)at least at this point.
bucolic_frolic
(43,128 posts)Probably to protect them when they vote against Articles of Impeachment.
Hassler
(3,376 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,859 posts)From the OP article -