Navy Wants to Eject From SEALs a Sailor Cleared by Trump, Officials Say
Source: NYT
The Navy SEAL at the center of a high-profile war crimes case has been ordered to appear before Navy leaders Wednesday morning, and is expected to be notified that the Navy intends to oust him from the elite commando force, two Navy officials said on Tuesday.
The move could put the SEAL commander, Rear Adm. Collin Green, in direct conflict with President Trump, who last week cleared the sailor, Chief Petty Officer Edward Gallagher, of any judicial punishment in the war crimes case. Military leaders opposed that action as well as Mr. Trumps pardons of two soldiers involved in other murder cases.
Navy officials had planned to begin the process of taking away Chief Gallaghers Trident pin, the symbol of his membership in the SEALs, earlier this month. But as he waited outside his commanders office, Navy leaders sought clearance from the White House that never came, and no action was taken.
Admiral Green now has the authorization he needs from the Navy to act against Chief Gallagher, and the formal letter notifying the chief of the action has been drafted and signed by the admiral, the two officials said.
Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/19/us/navy-seals-edward-gallagher-trident.html
Freedomofspeech
(4,223 posts)Those men should not have been pardoned. He told the world commiting war crimes is just fine.
cstanleytech
(26,290 posts)took place?
EX500rider
(10,842 posts)..and medieval prisons.
cstanleytech
(26,290 posts)will reconsider.
Kurt V.
(5,624 posts)marcpud
(4 posts)Isnt accepting a Presidential pardon an implicit admission of guilt?
PatrickforO
(14,572 posts)nykym
(3,063 posts)The pardon is offered to the individual.
They cab either accept it or turn it down.
If accepted it is an admission of guilt.
gopiscrap
(23,758 posts)keithbvadu2
(36,787 posts)Any actions concerning the other SEAL who admitted actually killing the prisoner?
Submariner
(12,503 posts)It would be like being demoted to an everyday run of the mill Chief Petty Officer...period.
Evolve Dammit
(16,725 posts)GWB's administration brought back the war crimes and torture (Yoo and Gonzalez) calling the Geneva Conventions "quaint" and the Constitution a "goddam piece of paper" (GWB). Now we have a further enabling of war criminals by 45. Have we irreparably lost our way? I guess to fuck. And at least 30% of us is fine with that.
Quackers
(2,256 posts)By all measures, Trump has the final say. I dont agree with what Trump did, but I dont think the sailor can be punished now that the pardon has been given.
RainCaster
(10,869 posts)Accepting a pardon means that you admit to wrongdoing. The Seals are a premier group inside the Navy, and they will not accept such behavior in their ranks.
Quackers
(2,256 posts)Haggis for Breakfast
(6,831 posts)but he does NOT sit on the NAVY tribunal that decides this man's fate via the UCMJ. They have every right and all the legal authority they need to take his trident. And they absolutely should. This man has disgraced himself, the NAVY and especially the SEALS. I have had the honor of knowing many of these men and their courage, bravery and integrity were never in question. Gallagher leaves a stain that no one can remove, and SEALS deserve better than to be associated with this arrogant, lawless scum. TAKE HIS TRIDENT. He has proven that he is unfit to wear it.
trumpie has NO FUCKING BUSINESS interfering in military justice. His treatment of troops (and vets) is disgraceful and undermines the morale of all in uniform (and out). He is the biggest traitor of all.
Polybius
(15,390 posts)The president has the authority to stop or reverse any decision concerning the SEALs Tridents, according to Eugene R. Fidell, who teaches military justice at Yale Law School. But for generations, he said, presidents have generally refrained from inserting themselves into the militarys personnel decisions.
burrowowl
(17,639 posts)riversedge
(70,204 posts)DallasNE
(7,402 posts)Use Article 15 to strip the pin. Shouldn't be double jeopardy. No review process. Simple and clean.
jmowreader
(50,557 posts)It is, however, an allowable administrative action.
Were I his Team commander, I would kick him out of the Navy, grounds are Best Interest of the Service. This, in addition to revoking his trident.
obamanut2012
(26,068 posts)JohnnyRingo
(18,628 posts)...about whether Trump will go against the Navy admiral to restore the SEAL's trident badge:
The president is the commander in chief; he could give orders about how to peel the potatoes in the chow hall if he wanted, Mr. Fidell said. The question is, should he?
Regarding Chief Gallaghers Trident, he said: A reasonable observer could say this is a completely inappropriate intrusion into the military. If Trump saves his Trident and Id bet on it I would say he will have driven the wedge ever deeper into an already divided military. And that cant be helpful.
Putin's dream come true
Progressive Jones
(6,011 posts)Are the SEALS required to let him do the work?
Can't they bust him down to shining shoes, or operating a broom, or whatever?
rampartc
(5,407 posts)at any of several remote locations with miserable weather and limited recreational opportunities where he can polish his trident and bore the young sailors with war stories.
Progressive Jones
(6,011 posts)Others in his unit probably won't trust him. At the least, they won't like the distraction he's become.
roamer65
(36,745 posts)Dishonorable discharge.
Ignore any antics Dumpy tries.
jmowreader
(50,557 posts)That can only be inflicted as part of a General Court Martial sentence.
An Other Than Honorable discharge IS available to them, its an administrative action. However, Trump is probably going to reverse any actions taken against Gallagher...because it certainly seems like Trump is working overtime to turn the whole world against us.
Marcuse
(7,479 posts)rabid_decline
(36 posts)That the orange one is the 1st prez to pardon war criminals? I think I heard Hartmann say that.
Response to demmiblue (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
OneCrazyDiamond
(2,031 posts)He was acquitted. The Navy flubbed the case badly and we skated the war crime charges. It is the posing with the body that he was demoted for.
dware
(12,369 posts)People seem to have lost sight of that.
Posing with an enemy combatants body isn't unusual, it happens more times than most people realize, I saw it plenty in VN, not saying it's right, just saying it happens frequently.
dustyscamp
(2,224 posts)It's full of magats tossing their shit at Admiral Green and the Left.
President Trump is the Commander in Chief and therefore has all the authority to interject as he deems fit.
Seems to me, the Commander in Chief needs to clean house at the Command levels. A majority of these Commanders have the same problem we are seeing from the NSC Staff, Department of State and other long term Political career Politicians (Republicans and Democrats) who have decided to run their offices as they seem fit rather than actually listen or follow their boss
Pres Trump or the SECDEF should immediately stop this outright insubordination by this admiral and now this review board... Admiral Greene should be disciplined and forced to retire!!!!!