NEW: DC Circuit panel puts hold on McGahn testimony for now, will hear arguments on Jan. 3....

[mahatmakanejeeves]

Source: Todd Ruger's Twitter account

NEW: DC Circuit panel puts hold on McGahn testimony for now, will hear arguments on Jan. 3 about whether he must comply with House Judiciary Committee subpoena.

Read more:

Link to tweet

---

Kevin M. Kruse Retweeted

https://twitter.com/KevinMKruse

January. 3rd. 🙃🙃🙃

Link to tweet

Trump is winning by running out the clock on legal cases. Not dissimilar from how his team slow-walked Mueller responses from the president. Via @charlie_savage

Link to tweet

--------

Sorry. Twitter's all I've got. BumRushDaShow, are you still up? Got anything better?

[hlthe2b]

1. Panel is two Bush family appointees (Henderson, Griffith) and a Clinton appointee (Rogers).

Circuit Court will hear the case on 1/3. Panel is two Bush family appointees (Henderson, Griffith) and a Clinton appointee (Rogers). Henderson voted in favor of en banc rehearing on Mazars, so she seems a bad draw. Griffith is now the wild card in this and Mueller grand jury case

Link to tweet

[hlthe2b]

2. Order:

Link to tweet

[mahatmakanejeeves]

5. Thanks for coming up with the links and tweets.

I'm on dial-up at home. I can't do a lot of searching.

[onenote]

6. These are not necessarily the three judges that will hear the case.

I believe this was the "motions panel" that currently handles motions.

[jaysunb]

4. McGahn sholud be reminded abot the statute of limintations. n/t

[Buckeyeblue]

7. If possible why not fast-track this to the Supreme Court?

It's a pretty simple question about the supeana power of the House. It seems like the Republicans wouldn't want to risk losing this power when the shoe is on the other foot.