Judge denies Roger Stone's request for new trial
Source: The Hill
A federal judge denied Roger Stone's request for a new trial, a court filing unsealed on Wednesday revealed.
Stone, a longtime associate of President Trump, had sought a new trial after being convicted in November of lying to Congress and witness tampering, based on the judges refusal to strike a juror.
Judge Amy Berman Jackson, an Obama appointee who is presiding over the trial, denied Stone's request last week. In her order, which was unsealed today, Jackson said it had not been necessary to strike the juror for alleged bias, and added that Stones defense team provided no reason to believe there had been a serious miscarriage of justice.
(snip)
Read more: https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/482811-judge-denies-roger-stone-request-for-new-trial
Laurelin
(780 posts)Why include that information? Do we now assume all judges are partisan and unfair because Trump is trying to make the courts completely partisan and loyal only to him and not to the law?
KSNY
(320 posts)federal workers who do not break the law to please him
Fullduplexxx
(8,610 posts)greenjar_01
(6,477 posts)It may as well be edited by Brad Parscale
rockfordfile
(8,742 posts)onenote
(46,056 posts)Which, of course, we do whenever there is a court ruling these days.
Rider3
(919 posts)This is the same judge whom Stone doctored a photo of showing her in the crosshairs of a gun. It doesn't matter who appointed her. Stone is a disgusting human being.
bluestarone
(21,639 posts)Sit on it for awhile. Let them stew!!
onenote
(46,056 posts)But that's not written in, no pun intended, stone. It's already been postponed at least once.
AlexSFCA
(6,319 posts)world wide wally
(21,836 posts)ZERTErYNOthe
(260 posts)Not hopeful here, but is there any way to run out the clock, like was done with Merrick Garland, in order to make the sentence Pardon Proof? (assuming Dotard doesn't get a second term).
