Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

lavenderdiva

(10,726 posts)
Thu Apr 2, 2020, 04:43 PM Apr 2020

Navy Expected to Relieve Captain Who Raised Alarm About Covid-19 Outbreak on Aircraft Carrier

Source: NBC News

The Navy is expected to announce it has relieved the captain who sounded the alarm about an outbreak of COVID-19 aboard the USS Theodore Roosevelt, according to two U.S. officials.

Crozier raised the alarm earlier this week that sailors on the ship need to be quarantined to stop the spread of the virus. His plea for assistance quickly made headlines.

Crozier sent a letter to the Navy on Monday begging for help addressing the coronavirus outbreak aboard his ship, which was forced to dock in Guam last week. The ship leadership began testing everyone on board. By Wednesday, there were 93 positive test results and more than 1,000 people had departed the ship into isolation on Guam. In total, 2,700 people are expected to disembark the ship this week, with a smaller crew remaining to maintain the ship.

The move is expected to be announced in a briefing by Acting Secretary of the Navy Thomas Modly Thursday evening. The official reason for Crozier's relief of duty is a loss of trust and confidence, according to the officials who spoke to NBC News



Read more: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/military/navy-expected-relieve-captain-who-raised-alarm-about-covid-19-n1175351



Anyone surprised?
75 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Navy Expected to Relieve Captain Who Raised Alarm About Covid-19 Outbreak on Aircraft Carrier (Original Post) lavenderdiva Apr 2020 OP
So he decided to make an example out of another whistleblower. bullwinkle428 Apr 2020 #1
Captain tries to save his crew... Trump makes sure Captain is crucified for defying 'talking points' NotHardly Apr 2020 #23
+ 1. nt iluvtennis Apr 2020 #38
No. Alacritous Crier Apr 2020 #2
Trump's Navy. lagomorph777 Apr 2020 #13
That sounds about right. - nt Alacritous Crier Apr 2020 #19
My, how very CCP of them nt intrepidity Apr 2020 #3
Future Medal of Honor recipient Freethinker65 Apr 2020 #4
I knew it. dawg day Apr 2020 #5
"relieved" doesn't sound like a good thing in this case. What was he supposed to do? flibbitygiblets Apr 2020 #6
Relieved means he'll never get another promotion. marble falls Apr 2020 #8
Yep. He'll be a Captain, assigned to some no, nevermind COLGATE4 Apr 2020 #10
Yep. He'll be buried in the Pentagon. marble falls Apr 2020 #11
Jn charge of the widget inventory COLGATE4 Apr 2020 #12
No he won't atreides1 Apr 2020 #20
My experiance leads me believe otherwise. Millitary bullies treat their victims like trophies. marble falls Apr 2020 #22
Commanders aren't supposed to broadcast readiness problems. BusyBeingBest Apr 2020 #26
A new twist on the old adage, 'a squeeky wheel gets greased.' Shame in the Navy. marble falls Apr 2020 #7
Excellent makeover! Thanks. n/t Judi Lynn Apr 2020 #14
This decision came from the top, as did those re the Vindamans and the Seal war criminal. Marcuse Apr 2020 #9
+1 2naSalit Apr 2020 #30
No good deed will go unpunished Zambero Apr 2020 #15
good one n/t Lulu KC Apr 2020 #53
He'll Likely Resign... Standby for the Interview. djacq Apr 2020 #16
No, he'll put in his retirement papers. Then, he may do an interview. sarge43 Apr 2020 #51
MotherFUCK that shit. Paladin Apr 2020 #17
Come January 20, 2021, he will be reinstated to his command and the person(s) turbinetree Apr 2020 #18
Of course they did... artemisia1 Apr 2020 #21
It's official: U.S. Navy relieves commander of coronavirus-hit aircraft carrier Eugene Apr 2020 #24
If he went up the chain of command and they refused to act, then he had BusyBeingBest Apr 2020 #25
Yes - there are other ethical reasons for taking his actions ArizonaLib Apr 2020 #31
Probably the case. Sometimes you've got to do the right thing... paleotn Apr 2020 #32
I agree. This captain put his crew above career. Strelnikov_ Apr 2020 #44
I'm sure Trump already told his dictator buddies that the carrier was defunct. hadEnuf Apr 2020 #46
I Bet He Thinks Saving All Those Men Was Worth It Me. Apr 2020 #27
Great....Now we have a carrier down for who knows how long paleotn Apr 2020 #28
On Stephanie Miller's show yesterday Malcom Nance dflprincess Apr 2020 #29
Well put nt Quixote1818 Apr 2020 #33
Navy Expected to Relieve Captain Who Raised Alarm About Covid-19 Outbreak on Aircraft Carrier FelineOverlord Apr 2020 #34
I am surprised and disappointed in the Navy if true. Sapient Donkey Apr 2020 #35
A warning to all in the C of C never to speak out. kairos12 Apr 2020 #36
That is so true DeminPennswoods Apr 2020 #50
I hope the real military leadership in the Biden administration will fix this. JustABozoOnThisBus Apr 2020 #37
That presumes the blinders come off nitpicker Apr 2020 #48
Sorry for the Captain, but he was going to become the scapegoat and be relieved anyway Raven123 Apr 2020 #39
K&R He deserves the Medal of Freedom! bronxiteforever Apr 2020 #40
Another "leaker" dealt with JHB Apr 2020 #41
The Captain knew Chainfire Apr 2020 #42
Mickey Mouse and Chickenshit sarge43 Apr 2020 #49
Is Shitler still having his daily chats with Vlad? I swear that's who is "advising" him. OMGWTF Apr 2020 #43
Malcom Nance said this guy was track to be an admiral but admitting this blew his chances kimbutgar Apr 2020 #45
Punishe the innocent; promote the guilty. SOP. n/t sarge43 Apr 2020 #47
How dare he protect his crew???? TNNurse Apr 2020 #52
I suppose to be the contrarian..... TomSlick Apr 2020 #54
I agree with you BlueNIndiana Apr 2020 #62
Careful, sailor. Agreeing with me on this is dangerous. TomSlick Apr 2020 #63
BS...secure or unsecured... pbmus Apr 2020 #64
I disagree. It was not at all BS for the Captain to raise his concerns. TomSlick Apr 2020 #65
If his superiors were ignoring or otherwise delaying decisions due pbmus Apr 2020 #66
Let's try it this way: TomSlick Apr 2020 #67
Again, you are assuming a bad actor when sailors are dying right now because pbmus Apr 2020 #68
My argument is based on years of working with classified information. TomSlick Apr 2020 #69
I have also worked in top secret environments...1st in Vietnam pbmus Apr 2020 #70
I'm certain that communication security was not the primary concern using a PRC 77. TomSlick Apr 2020 #72
My radioman was one of my primary communication security concerns ... pbmus Apr 2020 #74
This message was self-deleted by its author geralmar Apr 2020 #73
Fuckers. mahina Apr 2020 #55
Nothing to be surprised about after firing the Sec of the Navy Under The Radar Apr 2020 #56
U.S.A. warmfeet Apr 2020 #57
So, has Captain Crozier suffered a loss of faith and confidence in the Navy's command? patphil Apr 2020 #58
Trump is sending a message to other captains, gab13by13 Apr 2020 #59
He was warned not to raise the truth. keithbvadu2 Apr 2020 #60
trump and pestilence brigade rev up and orleans Apr 2020 #61
PLEASE contact your Congressman and Senators 70sEraVet Apr 2020 #71
Kick ck4829 Apr 2020 #75

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
13. Trump's Navy.
Thu Apr 2, 2020, 05:03 PM
Apr 2020

Why am I picturing a little boy with rubber duckies, laughing at his own fart bubbles in the bathtub?

dawg day

(7,947 posts)
5. I knew it.
Thu Apr 2, 2020, 04:48 PM
Apr 2020

It's little comfort, but his shipmates will have confidence in him.

I heard the lickspittle acting navy secy downplaying the danger... no big deal!

flibbitygiblets

(7,220 posts)
6. "relieved" doesn't sound like a good thing in this case. What was he supposed to do?
Thu Apr 2, 2020, 04:48 PM
Apr 2020

Wait until they all died and the ship just floats around like a ghost ship? Is that was he was expected to do?

Why the FUCK is it a bad thing to just be honest that people are infected?

COLGATE4

(14,732 posts)
10. Yep. He'll be a Captain, assigned to some no, nevermind
Thu Apr 2, 2020, 04:58 PM
Apr 2020

job in East Ringworm, AL until he can't take it and retires. Keep in mind that he was on a fast track to make Admiral until he put the needs of his sailors first.

atreides1

(16,067 posts)
20. No he won't
Thu Apr 2, 2020, 05:26 PM
Apr 2020

The suits in the Pentagon won't put themselves in the position of being in the same building as a commander who did what he was suppose to do...take care of his people.

Most of the empty suits that make up the Joint Chiefs are nothing more then civilians with color ribbons on their chests...there are E-1's in the military that possess more courage then the 8 old white men, who are long past their prime..and have spent more time in the last 3 years, trying to figure out how not to upset the Russian puppet in the White House!

BusyBeingBest

(8,052 posts)
26. Commanders aren't supposed to broadcast readiness problems.
Thu Apr 2, 2020, 05:38 PM
Apr 2020

Also, commanders and officers in general aren't supposed to complain/call out problems. They are supposed to git-'er-done or hide the fact that they aren't gitting 'er done.

Marcuse

(7,446 posts)
9. This decision came from the top, as did those re the Vindamans and the Seal war criminal.
Thu Apr 2, 2020, 04:55 PM
Apr 2020

Last edited Thu Apr 2, 2020, 05:47 PM - Edit history (2)

Trump may have him reassigned to Naples.

sarge43

(28,940 posts)
51. No, he'll put in his retirement papers. Then, he may do an interview.
Thu Apr 2, 2020, 07:01 PM
Apr 2020

He won't get any further up the greasy pole

Paladin

(28,243 posts)
17. MotherFUCK that shit.
Thu Apr 2, 2020, 05:13 PM
Apr 2020

That Captain deserves the Medal Of Honor for his actions aboard that carrier.

Let's see the trump whores try to put a happy face on this revolting development.

turbinetree

(24,683 posts)
18. Come January 20, 2021, he will be reinstated to his command and the person(s)
Thu Apr 2, 2020, 05:16 PM
Apr 2020

that decided to do what they did to him will be under indictment.....................for there crimes, against the country, against humanity....................that is all....................

artemisia1

(756 posts)
21. Of course they did...
Thu Apr 2, 2020, 05:29 PM
Apr 2020

This Captain should be on the list for Rear Admiral (Lower Half) for putting the welfare of his people above his own career. The moment I heard this story about the letter, though, I knew his career was effectively over. The vindictiveness of those in power is legendary.

Eugene

(61,819 posts)
24. It's official: U.S. Navy relieves commander of coronavirus-hit aircraft carrier
Thu Apr 2, 2020, 05:31 PM
Apr 2020

Source: Reuters

WORLD NEWS APRIL 2, 2020 / 5:20 PM / UPDATED 11 MINUTES AGO

U.S. Navy relieves commander of coronavirus-hit aircraft carrier

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Navy announced on Thursday it had relieved the commander of the U.S. aircraft carrier Theodore Roosevelt, who wrote a scathing letter that leaked to the public asking Navy leadership for stronger measures to control a coronavirus outbreak onboard.

Reuters reported earlier on Thursday that the commander, Captain Brett Crozier, was expected to be relieved.

Reporting by Phil Stewart and Idrees Ali; Editing by Chris Reese


https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-usa-navy-confirmat/u-s-navy-relieves-commander-of-coronavirus-hit-aircraft-carrier-idUSKBN21K3EC

BusyBeingBest

(8,052 posts)
25. If he went up the chain of command and they refused to act, then he had
Thu Apr 2, 2020, 05:35 PM
Apr 2020

no choice but to go public in order to force their hand and protect his sailors. He probably knew when he wrote the letter that it might be the career-ender for him. What an impossible situation for him--not able to complete the mission, not able to protect his people, and having to let enemy forces know the US has what amounts to a defunct carrier right now. Really a shitty situation.

ArizonaLib

(1,242 posts)
31. Yes - there are other ethical reasons for taking his actions
Thu Apr 2, 2020, 05:42 PM
Apr 2020

I don't think he will ever regret what he did and can live long and sleep well each and every night. He knew what he was getting into as he made his decision to go public. By the time he made his decision he was ok with leaving his career behind. Anyone who has ever had the strength to stand up for what is right knows this well.

paleotn

(17,884 posts)
32. Probably the case. Sometimes you've got to do the right thing...
Thu Apr 2, 2020, 05:46 PM
Apr 2020

consequences be damned. Sacrifice yourself for the good of your subordinates. That's called leadership. Read that in an old management textbook I think.

hadEnuf

(2,177 posts)
46. I'm sure Trump already told his dictator buddies that the carrier was defunct.
Thu Apr 2, 2020, 06:46 PM
Apr 2020

He has a habit of giving information to Russians, North Koreans and the Chinese.

paleotn

(17,884 posts)
28. Great....Now we have a carrier down for who knows how long
Thu Apr 2, 2020, 05:38 PM
Apr 2020

and a crew with moral issues, since the skipper who tried to protect them and got sacked for it. Nice.

dflprincess

(28,072 posts)
29. On Stephanie Miller's show yesterday Malcom Nance
Thu Apr 2, 2020, 05:42 PM
Apr 2020

said the commander was risking his career by going public. Nance also said the commander is to be admired for putting his crew ahead of his career.

And who among us doesn't agree with that?

FelineOverlord

(3,571 posts)
34. Navy Expected to Relieve Captain Who Raised Alarm About Covid-19 Outbreak on Aircraft Carrier
Thu Apr 2, 2020, 05:55 PM
Apr 2020

Twitter is understandably outraged.



?s=20


?s=20


?s=20


?s=20


?s=20

Sapient Donkey

(1,568 posts)
35. I am surprised and disappointed in the Navy if true.
Thu Apr 2, 2020, 05:56 PM
Apr 2020

Captain looks out for his crew and this is what happens.

DeminPennswoods

(15,265 posts)
50. That is so true
Thu Apr 2, 2020, 06:59 PM
Apr 2020

Going outside the command whether military or civilian, no matter how low or high-ranking one is, is pretty much verboten. But Crozier did the right thing. He will have the respect and admiration of his crew forever.

JustABozoOnThisBus

(23,325 posts)
37. I hope the real military leadership in the Biden administration will fix this.
Thu Apr 2, 2020, 06:00 PM
Apr 2020

Give him command of a fleet, give him a star, and a commendation.

This Captain is a leader.

nitpicker

(7,153 posts)
48. That presumes the blinders come off
Thu Apr 2, 2020, 06:54 PM
Apr 2020

The idiots that voted for the idiot.

And that Pence somehow isn't top of the ticket in November.

BUT even if Biden wins in November, the best the guy could hope for is a civilian makework job such as deputy assistant to the assistant secretary for Silly Walks (it would be titled something else, but...)

Raven123

(4,792 posts)
39. Sorry for the Captain, but he was going to become the scapegoat and be relieved anyway
Thu Apr 2, 2020, 06:09 PM
Apr 2020

They were going to blame him for failing to contain the outbreak. May as well go down fighting for his crew.

Chainfire

(17,471 posts)
42. The Captain knew
Thu Apr 2, 2020, 06:30 PM
Apr 2020

that if he went public his career would be over, but he still did the right thing, and now a lot of the men under him will be saved. He is a hero. Under a different Commander In Chief, he would have been supported in his efforts to save the crew.

This Captain is a true hero, and his Commander in Chief is a chickenshit draft dodger.

For those of you who's English may not be your first language, I will refer you to an expert for the definition:
From the book Citizen Soldiers by Stephen Ambrose.

Fussell defines the term precisely. "Chickenshit refers to behavior that makes military life worse than it need be: petty harassment of the weak by the strong; open scrimmage for power and authority and prestige... insistence on the letter rather than the spirit of ordinances. Chickenshit is so called -- instead of horse -- or bull -- or elephant shit -- because it is small-minded and ignoble and takes the trivial seriously. Chickenshit can be recognized instantly because it never has anything to do with winning the war."

sarge43

(28,940 posts)
49. Mickey Mouse and Chickenshit
Thu Apr 2, 2020, 06:55 PM
Apr 2020

Mickey Mouse: Re cleaning a perfectly clean floor (Pointless or unnecessary make work)

Chickenshit: With a toothbrush (Punishing and/or humiliating those caught up in the Mickey Mouse)

OMGWTF

(3,942 posts)
43. Is Shitler still having his daily chats with Vlad? I swear that's who is "advising" him.
Thu Apr 2, 2020, 06:31 PM
Apr 2020

Everything Trump does hurts American and our democracy. Hanging is too good for that malignant misanthrope.

kimbutgar

(21,055 posts)
45. Malcom Nance said this guy was track to be an admiral but admitting this blew his chances
Thu Apr 2, 2020, 06:36 PM
Apr 2020

He said his navy career is basically over. I hope when Biden becomes President he makes this guy the secretary of the Navy for his bravery.

TomSlick

(11,088 posts)
54. I suppose to be the contrarian.....
Thu Apr 2, 2020, 07:15 PM
Apr 2020

The Captain was right to raise his concerns. However, if he did so using an unsecured e-mail system he was wrong.

The readiness of a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier is a matter of serious sensitivity. A report that the aircraft has potential problems with essential manning is too sensitive to be on any unsecured system. Such information should, almost necessarily, be classified as Top Secret.

An aircraft carrier can send e-mail via SIPRNET - a secured system used to transmit classified information. There is no reason I can imagine for the Captain not using SIPRNET to forward his letter. If, for some reason, the SIPRNET could not be used, the letter should have been flown to a location where it could be sent via SIPRNET.

If the Captain sent the letter over an unsecured system intentionally, he did so so that it would be leaked. If the Captain sent the letter over an unsecured system unintentionally, he was woefully negligent.

If, as reported, the Captain forwarded his e-mail using unsecured e-mail, he should be relieved.

 

BlueNIndiana

(94 posts)
62. I agree with you
Thu Apr 2, 2020, 09:21 PM
Apr 2020

I am ex navy enlisted.

I am not surprised he has or will be re-leaved of his commend.

From a civilian point of view it is commendable and it hard for the general public to understand the military and its policies and why they are so strict.

This is a national security issue. The readiness of the military is something that is kept close to the vest in order to deter enemies.

Making this public knowledge while admirable is also reckless from a military point of view.

I as lowly enlisted man who served on two different ships i can tell you the is no such things a social distancing on board a military ship it is virtually impossible to achieve even if you severely reduce the manning.

I suspect the number of cases on board that ship will be very high just do the close quarters they are living under.

If this hits the submarine force especially the boomer (ICBM) it could impact out nuclear deterrent capability and that can be very serous.

We have two primary boomer bases one in Washington State and one in Georgia.

The ships and the subs who have been at sea and are now assured they don't have the virus should not be allowed off the ship and only provision be dropped of at the pier or unrep.

anyone leaving the ship can not come back for at least 14 days and anyone who will come aboard should be isolated for at least 14 days and tested for the virus before they even set foot on those ships or submarines.

All branches of the service should stop the discharge of personnel immediate and stop all basic training.

All personnel should be required to stay on base and isolate the sick and stop the spread to the disease.

This disease is huge national security issue.

Most branches have some form of CHEMBIO training.

The ship training had for chem warfare was stark. They had decom station and if you tried to violate that and get back inside the ship, lets just say you was going to be dealt with in the harshest possible terms.

If you tried to break back in and open a hatch or door you would not live long enough, armed guards would put you down.


TomSlick

(11,088 posts)
63. Careful, sailor. Agreeing with me on this is dangerous.
Thu Apr 2, 2020, 09:26 PM
Apr 2020

I suspect that only veterans will understand.



TomSlick

(11,088 posts)
65. I disagree. It was not at all BS for the Captain to raise his concerns.
Thu Apr 2, 2020, 10:13 PM
Apr 2020

His mistake was sending vital national security information over unsecured systems.

I assume that you are not suggesting that it is BS to insist that national security information only be sent over secured systems. It would be the height of folly to send the information that a nuclear powered aircraft carrier may be unable to perform its mission in the clear. I know that you would not suggest such a thing.

pbmus

(12,422 posts)
66. If his superiors were ignoring or otherwise delaying decisions due
Thu Apr 2, 2020, 10:37 PM
Apr 2020

To politics...secure or unsecure doesn’t mean diddly to me if one sailor would die in the meantime...

You are being sanctimonious when lives were at stake....

Any other time, I might agree with you...but this is not one of those times.

TomSlick

(11,088 posts)
67. Let's try it this way:
Thu Apr 2, 2020, 10:49 PM
Apr 2020

Does it seem likely to you that bad actors in the Pacific would be interested to know that an aircraft carrier - and therefore an entire aircraft carrier task force - might be combat ineffective? If bad actors know that an aircraft carrier task force is combat ineffective, all the sailors in the task force are put in danger.

That is why such information must be sent only over secured systems.

pbmus

(12,422 posts)
68. Again, you are assuming a bad actor when sailors are dying right now because
Thu Apr 2, 2020, 10:55 PM
Apr 2020

My superior will not act because of politics...

My sailors dying right now are of more concern to me than Russian warships 1300 miles away...or any bad actor starting a war in the middle of a pandemic...

You’re argument is weak ... secure or unsecured

TomSlick

(11,088 posts)
69. My argument is based on years of working with classified information.
Thu Apr 2, 2020, 11:11 PM
Apr 2020

Using the SIPRNET is simple. It is an internet-like system that operates separately from the internet using encrypted communication. All that is required to send an e-mail over the SIPRNET is doing so over a computer connected to that system. An aircraft commander has a group of people whose job it is to operate the communications system. The letter could have been forwarded correctly as a matter of routine.

There was no reason for the Captain to send his letter over the internet. Hanlon's Razor suggests the Captain did not send the letter via the open internet for the purpose of having the letter leak but simply as a matter of negligence. Senior officers should expect to be relieved for serious acts of negligence.

pbmus

(12,422 posts)
70. I have also worked in top secret environments...1st in Vietnam
Thu Apr 2, 2020, 11:20 PM
Apr 2020

And I will tell you that my communication when my soldiers were at risk or dying was use the communication that will get the choppers in NOW, NOT LATER...

This is exactly what Captain Grozier did...He accomplished his primary duty, the safety of his sailors...

TomSlick

(11,088 posts)
72. I'm certain that communication security was not the primary concern using a PRC 77.
Thu Apr 2, 2020, 11:52 PM
Apr 2020

The military is indeed fortunate that secured communications are now a routine matter.

pbmus

(12,422 posts)
74. My radioman was one of my primary communication security concerns ...
Fri Apr 3, 2020, 12:59 AM
Apr 2020

Without radio and that 10 ft antenna sticking up in the air like here I am, the Vietcong knew that without him, our squad was dead...so I positioned him so that he was not in the five second kill zone...in other words a secure position...

Your assumption that we did not use secure communication is totally wrong...

‘The PRC-77 radios could be used for secure voice communications with the addition of NSA designed COMSEC boxes (KY-38 and later KY-57).’...

https://olive-drab.com/od_electronics_anprc25.php

And we are also very fortunate to have commanders like Captain Crozier, who knows his primary duty is the health and welfare of his crew.

Response to pbmus (Reply #70)

patphil

(6,150 posts)
58. So, has Captain Crozier suffered a loss of faith and confidence in the Navy's command?
Thu Apr 2, 2020, 07:28 PM
Apr 2020

Wrong people being relieved of duty.

gab13by13

(21,264 posts)
59. Trump is sending a message to other captains,
Thu Apr 2, 2020, 07:34 PM
Apr 2020

The USS Theodore Roosevelt isn't the only ship that has had virus problems. The USS Boxer and USS Coronado have had issues, and who knows how many more since Captains who complain will be fired.

keithbvadu2

(36,667 posts)
60. He was warned not to raise the truth.
Thu Apr 2, 2020, 07:36 PM
Apr 2020

He was warned not to raise the truth.

Defense Secretary Warns Commanders Not to Surprise Trump on Coronavirus

https://www.democraticunderground.com/100213039823

---------------------------
Esper Warns Not to Surprise Trump on Coronavirus

https://www.democraticunderground.com/100213041633

70sEraVet

(3,474 posts)
71. PLEASE contact your Congressman and Senators
Thu Apr 2, 2020, 11:30 PM
Apr 2020

Capt. Brett Crozier was looking out for the welfare of his sailors, and was embarrassing his superiors, who consistently refused to acknowledge the dire circumstances aboard. To assign a new Commanding Officer at this point would DESTROY the morale of that ship for years to come. REINSTATE CAPTAIN COZIER.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Navy Expected to Relieve ...