Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Polybius

(15,336 posts)
Thu Apr 23, 2020, 02:52 PM Apr 2020

Divided Supreme Court rules for Trump administration in requiring immigrant's removal

Source: Fox News

The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday upheld a lower court's decision that an immigrant with lawful permanent resident status cannot fight deportation due to a previous offense, even though that crime was not grounds for his removal.

In a 5-4 ruling with conservative justices on one side and liberals on the other, the court ruled for the Trump administration in holding that the statute in question, as drafted by Congress, requires deportation in the case of Andre Barton, even though the assault offenses that prevent him from appealing were not enough to deport him in the first place.

"Removal of a lawful permanent resident from the United States is a wrenching process, especially in light of the consequences for family members," Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote in the court's opinion. "Removal is particularly difficult when it involves someone such as Barton who has spent most of his life in the United States. Congress made a choice, however, to authorize removal of noncitizens— even lawful permanent residents—who have committed certain serious crimes. And Congress also made a choice to categorically preclude cancellation of removal for noncitizens who have substantial criminal records. Congress may of course amend the law at any time. In the meantime, the Court is constrained to apply the law as enacted by Congress."

The controversy deals with an immigration law that allows defendants to apply for cancelation of deportation, but only if they satisfy certain requirements, including not having committed a particular offense within their first seven years of continuous residence in the U.S. This limitation, known as the "stop-time rule," refers to offenses that render individuals inadmissible or deportable. Barton, who is being deported for drug and firearms offenses, had committed aggravated assault offenses during that seven-year period, but those offenses did not qualify for deportation.

Read more: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/supreme-court-upholds-immigrants-removal



Sorry it's Fux, but for some reason the good networks aren't covering this. If I find a better source, I'll edit it.
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Divided Supreme Court rules for Trump administration in requiring immigrant's removal (Original Post) Polybius Apr 2020 OP
I agree with this decision Jake Stern Apr 2020 #1
I thought Lennon vs U.S. established a precedent for this ArizonaLib Apr 2020 #2

Jake Stern

(3,145 posts)
1. I agree with this decision
Thu Apr 23, 2020, 03:12 PM
Apr 2020

This dude needs to go. We have enough native born criminal scumbags and now he's free to victimize the people in his homeland.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Divided Supreme Court rul...