Judge Orders FCC to Hand Over IP Addresses Linked to Fake Net Neutrality Comments
Source: gizmodo
A Manhattan federal judge has ruled the Federal Communications Commission must provide two reporters access to server logs that may provide new insight into the allegations of fraud stemming from agencys 2017 net neutrality rollback. A pair of New York Times reportersNicholas Confessore and Gabriel Dancesued the FCC under the Freedom of Information Act after it refused their request to view copies of the logs. The logs will show, among other details, the originating IP addresses behind the millions of public comments sent to the agency ahead of the December 2017 net neutrality vote.
The FCC attempted to quash the papers request but failed to persuade District Judge Lorna Schofield, who wrote that, despite the privacy concerns raised by the agency, releasing the logs may help clarify whether fraudulent activity interfered with the comment period, as well as whether the agencys decision-making process is vulnerable to corruption.
Regardless, Schofield said she also decided to weigh any hypothetical harm against the potential value of the information to the public. In this case, the public interest in disclosure is great because the importance of the comment process to agency rulemaking is great, she said, adding: If genuine public comment is drowned out by a fraudulent facsimile, then the notice-and-comment process has failed.
Read more: https://gizmodo.com/judge-orders-fcc-to-hand-over-ip-addresses-linked-to-fa-1843202071
Roy Rolling
(6,911 posts)Leaving an IP address is the virtual equivalent of dropping your ID at the crime scene.
They didnt care, because the FCC didnt carethey were following the FCCs orders.
Its the curious case of the silent watchdog by Sherlock Holmes all over again.
grantcart
(53,061 posts)ck4829
(35,041 posts)ItsjustMe
(11,230 posts)those people used VPN's
reACTIONary
(5,770 posts).... of commentators using vpns is significantly higher for those who opposed net neutrality than those who supported, that would be telling.
moonseller66
(430 posts)Are these the same Republican ilk who want 256 different forms of id (and more) for minorities to be able to vote...because...VOTER FRAUD?
Yet no concern about fraud when it comes to a complete puppet hack running the FCC?
Uh Huh!
Hypocrisy...thy name is Republican.
Faux pas
(14,657 posts)excellent!