Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,021 posts)
Mon May 4, 2020, 04:33 PM May 2020

Cuomo outlines rules for partial reopening of some Upstate New York regions

Source: WBFO

Gov. Andrew Cuomo said Monday that some Upstate New York regions may be able to have a limited reopening of some businesses when the current shutdown order expires May 15, but it will come with many caveats.

The governor is setting a list of criteria for potential regional reopenings in the Rochester area, where he held his daily briefing, as well as the North Country, the Mohawk Valley, Central New York and the Southern Tier.

It is based on epidemiological science and aims for holding the transmission rate of COVID-19 to 1.1% or lower, so that the greater freedom of movement does not lead to the virus multiplying exponentially and overwhelming the health care system.

Cuomo said New York is trying to learn from other countries, like Italy and Singapore, where an initial reopening occurred too quickly and restarted the spread of the virus.

Read more: https://news.wbfo.org/post/cuomo-outlines-rules-partial-reopening-some-upstate-new-york-regions

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Cuomo outlines rules for partial reopening of some Upstate New York regions (Original Post) alp227 May 2020 OP
I think he is making a big mistake. As many as 3.000 deaths per day might be happening by June and totodeinhere May 2020 #1
the criteria for testing and contact tracing seem vague and inadequate soryang May 2020 #3
"There also needs to be enough testing, with a capability to provide 30 tests for every 100,000" EarthFirst May 2020 #2
That actually seems reasonable. Massacure May 2020 #5
Factory orders down more than 50% bucolic_frolic May 2020 #4

totodeinhere

(13,058 posts)
1. I think he is making a big mistake. As many as 3.000 deaths per day might be happening by June and
Mon May 4, 2020, 05:06 PM
May 2020

he wants to open some regions back up? I have been supporting him and he has done a good job so far. But this is a mistake I am afraid.

soryang

(3,299 posts)
3. the criteria for testing and contact tracing seem vague and inadequate
Mon May 4, 2020, 05:26 PM
May 2020

30 tests per 100,000? really? Even if that were a per day figure, it's too small.

EarthFirst

(2,900 posts)
2. "There also needs to be enough testing, with a capability to provide 30 tests for every 100,000"
Mon May 4, 2020, 05:26 PM
May 2020

Is that a typo?

Or am I understanding this wrong?

30 tests per 100,000?

Massacure

(7,521 posts)
5. That actually seems reasonable.
Mon May 4, 2020, 08:34 PM
May 2020

30 tests per 100,000 is equivalent to about 90,000 nationally. About 30,000 people per day are being infected in the United States, so being able to test 90,000 people per day seems reasonable.

bucolic_frolic

(43,158 posts)
4. Factory orders down more than 50%
Mon May 4, 2020, 05:30 PM
May 2020

More employment report on Friday. Treasury to borrow $3 Trillion more for the second quarter. That's what's keeping the market from collapsing.

But, as an aside. These plunges in production, consumption, disruption from the pandemic .... the magnitude of these numbers remind me of only a few things in history. Now admittedly I haven't read them all but changes like this in modern times happened during World War I in Czarist Russia. Factories were empty, production stopped, people wanted change. Fortunately we have institutionalized methods of change - elections! GOTV

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Cuomo outlines rules for ...