Coronavirus: Sweden's death rate from COVID-19 surpasses USA
Source: 9news
Sweden has had a surge in deaths from coronavirus, surpassing the rate of the USA, according to new figures.
The Scandinavian nation controversially rejected the stricter lockdown approach of other countries in their strategy to overcome the COVID-19 pandemic, keeping most schools open, as well as stores and restaurants.
According to data from John Hopkins University, now Sweden has a death rate of 297.16 for every 1 million citizens, after 3,040 died from coronavirus. There have been 24,623 confirmed COVID-19 cases and so far 4,074 have recovered.
Comparatively the death rate in the US is 226.33 per 1 million citizens, after 74,239 have passed away from the virus.
Read more: https://www.9news.com.au/world/coronavirus-sweden-death-toll-covid19-rate-greater-than-usa/2ff8dd35-ecdc-42b8-bc89-5da7736f52cd
Yet, Trump has been pushing the U.S. to adopt the Sweden model. Also, Sweden has several advantages that the U.S. does not. Sweden does not have large, multi-generational families living in one house. In some way, they are naturally socially distanced, but even with this factors, they are experiencing a surge in deaths.
Mike 03
(16,616 posts)exboyfil
(17,862 posts)and 3.5 times worse than Denmark.
democrattotheend
(11,605 posts)When we first started shutting down, they told us it was to flatten the curve, so that we didn't get it all at once and overwhelm the healthcare system, not to reduce the overall number of people who get it. As far as I know Sweden hasn't had any problems with healthcare capacity and that's part of why they were able to do it this way. They have universal healthcare and more ventilators per person than we do, and a better social safety net overall.
I'm guessing that in a year to 18 months Sweden's deaths per million will be similar to other Scandinavian countries that shut down more.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Their claim is that all the other countries will get to where they are, eventually.
Hugin
(33,135 posts)Most depressing movie ending... Ever.
However, to pursue the let's-kill-everybody-now strategy vastly discounts the value of time in developing improved therapies, treatments, and preventatives. As well as, merely gaining an understanding of the nature of the disease.
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)And it puts a pretty low value on human life.
Not a good look for Sweden.
not_the_one
(2,227 posts)a great interpretation of a Stephen King horror tale.
I don't know if I have ever hated a "so-called christian" as much as Marcia Gay Harden's character.
And Thomas Jane at his hunkiest.
Hugin
(33,135 posts)First off, it's the only Stephen King story I've never read and have only seen the movie.
But, odder still, for the longest time I'd only catch it on television half way through when everything had already gone to crap. Even when I was consciously planning to watch it, I would miss the beginning. Which, to see is really critical.
So, finally, I bought the disk. So much more disturbing in context.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Warpy
(111,255 posts)which might be explained by the US's late response to the danger or the reluctance of dithering Republican governors to realize the gravity of the situation and call for restrictions.
NM issued strict restrictions long before Washington admitted there was a problem and our rate is more than double the average, 465 per million, largely due to a holocaust of it on the Navajo reservation and towns just outside it.
Restrictions are only a stopgap measure, at best, buying time to gear up production and distribution of necessary supplies to deal with a virus we can neither prevent nor treat. Producers did comply, but the administration has thrown a wrench into distribution by insisting on seizing supplies and micromanaging who gets them, and who gets them are generally not outside the government.
I don't know what the final numbers will look like in a couple of years, but I imagine the Swedish approach might not look all that much worse than Draconian restrictions followed by gradual opening.
I do know our numbers will be among the worst until we sweep out the heartless, gormless garbage in DC.
exboyfil
(17,862 posts)Germany is probably the best comparison, and it is not perfect. If we continue to run 2.6x the rate of Germany, then we have some explaining to do.
Warpy
(111,255 posts)between enough compliance to foul up the supply chain combined with epic governmental bungling and doing practically nothing.
The whole world has to reopen, has.to. The next year will tell the story whether or not the strict compliance to restrictions in Norway and Germany had a long lasting effect. Looking at past pandemics, my guess is no.
Would we be better off having done nothing at all? Of course not, suppliers have been doing their jobs and if the distribution had been not been fouled up by Orange Shitstain and his ntiwit son in law, we might actually be prepared to deal with this.
Comparing Sweden to Norway or Germany right now is short term thinking. This requires long term thinking and I sincerely hope I am wrong. However, past experience often predicts the most likely outcome.
calimary
(81,238 posts)Response to TomCADem (Original post)
Walleye This message was self-deleted by its author.
jimfields33
(15,787 posts)Only thing is the United States will have a horrible death count and a horrible economy. Same with the rest of the world. Sweden might have to keep the EU financially stable since it will be the only country able to.
gibraltar72
(7,503 posts)other European countries.
jimfields33
(15,787 posts)I wonder why. If the United States stayed open and just went with the flow. Do you think our economy would be worse then now?
IronLionZion
(45,433 posts)The more deaths, the more people who know someone who is impacted personally. In a consumer driven economy, people feel less likely to go out to bars and restaurants and shops in such an environment. So even if everything is open, plenty of people will choose to stay home to avoid getting infection.
My area is likely to open up gradually over the next few weeks, but I don't plan on going out unless I have to.
jimfields33
(15,787 posts)I think some restaurants are open for 25 percent max capacity but Id never go. I guess I feel like if we never closed would I stay home? Im not sure.
IronLionZion
(45,433 posts)and will be operating at a loss.
Consumers vary a lot. Some folks claim they are very gung ho about going out as soon as they can while many others will remain cautious and wait and see what happens.
jimfields33
(15,787 posts)The whole things a mess. Sadly the world economy will suffer hard.
Hav
(5,969 posts)even that might not be the case anymore with recent expectations that their economy's contraction will be comparable to other European countries.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100213408059
jimfields33
(15,787 posts)DrToast
(6,414 posts)Hugin
(33,135 posts)One of the few things that used to set the human species apart from the lesser animals was to care for handicapped, injured, or aged members of the species.
Now? Not so much.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)They seem to think only poor POC and the elderly will fall into their magic number of 1-2%
deaths.
Hugin
(33,135 posts)"noblesse oblige".
The prevailing zeitgeist now seems to be pounding the weak to dust.
Maybe it's time for modern society to learn what the Ancient Egyptians learned with the collapse of the first dynasty. Even though you think of yourself as a god, the opinions of others may differ. You only rule at the grace of those over whom you rule. The very first "Social Contract", if you will.
jimfields33
(15,787 posts)Less social security being spent especially Medicare and less democratic voters.
God help me. But I swear they think that. Ghoulish!
jimfields33
(15,787 posts)IronLionZion
(45,433 posts)which is quite the opposite of the "kill the weak and vulnerable as quickly as possible" plan that the most malicious villains are promoting. The Sweden model is pain, punishment, and mass death, and should not be called herd immunity.
Any time anyone wants, they can easily compare Sweden's numbers against all their neighbors: Norway, Denmark, Finland, Iceland. They are demographically similar but one country has dramatically different outcomes than the others.
jimfields33
(15,787 posts)IronLionZion
(45,433 posts)so it disproportionately impacts immigrants and in the US it's also black Americans. That's the socio-economic factor.
Now there are also factors related to dying, like underlying health conditions, genetic conditions, etc. Where I grew up in Western PA, a lot of the white families are prone to blood clots. And we are seeing that play out with deadly results when they catch COVID-19. In some states that have coal mining, there are lung issues.
So Sweden's Somalian Muslim immigrants might have something like that involved as they are disproportionately impacted.
jimfields33
(15,787 posts)The whole thing is sad.
Politicub
(12,165 posts)How could anyone foresee how allowing people who have a highly contagious illness to congregate would cause more people to get sick and die?
135 new deaths reported today per worldometer, they are now 6th among western non-micro/non island countries and have passed The Netherlands.
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
Submariner
(12,503 posts)so he can be Number 1 again.
jimfields33
(15,787 posts)They are happiest in the world after all. I wonder if they drop next survey.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,683 posts)Finland is the happiest country in the world, with Denmark, Norway, Iceland, and The Netherlands holding the next top positions. Sweden is only #7. We are #19. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Happiness_Report
RobinA
(9,888 posts)and infection rate remains lower than quite a few other European nations. Not saying I agree (or disagree) with their approach, but let's be honest when we look at the numbers
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,683 posts)social structures and health care systems. That's why comparing Sweden with Norway, Finland and Denmark tells us more than comparing it with Italy or Spain.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,683 posts)But now the Swedes are claiming Norway and the other Nordic countries will catch up with them eventually because their lockdowns are just dragging out the process and everybody will get the virus sooner or later.
"It is impossible to slow down, and will kill about as many people per inhabitant and country," he told the newspaper. Giesecke describes the virus as a natural disaster and says those countries that have closed society now will experience high death rates in the fall, winter and year to come.
Really? Does he not take into consideration the fact that keeping some kind of lockdown in place protects people while buying time to develop treatments and vaccines and to increase hospital capacity so people who do get sick can be treated effectively?
democrattotheend
(11,605 posts)Remember, the point of shutting down was to prevent us all from getting it at once and overwhelming the hospital system, not to reduce the overall number of people who get it. It's too late to contain it. Sweden, from what I understand, was in better shape to begin with in terms of hospital capacity and therefore didn't have to shut down as much.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,683 posts)while vaccines and treatments are being developed means fewer people will die of it. If I'm going to get it I'd rather get it a year from now when more is known about it, hospitals are better equipped, and better treatments have been developed, even if a vaccine isn't ready yet.
w0nderer
(1,937 posts)mitch96
(13,895 posts)I went on the worldmeter tracking sight and there are about 6 countries that are worse than Sweden.. Worldmeter just showed 314/million for Sweden.
France 398/mil
UK 406/mil
Italy 500/mil
Spain 562/mil
Belgium 735/mil
What am I missing here??
m
jimfields33
(15,787 posts)Thats what I get from most here. No other countries are comparable apparently.
mitch96
(13,895 posts)Not to offend but, why? b/c they are nordic countries?? How about the Netherlands..314/mil
One less than Sweden... Is it a regional thing??
m
jimfields33
(15,787 posts)Just the common comparisons on here. I tried to compare the entire European Union and it was shot down.
Steelrolled
(2,022 posts)Also people have to keep cranking out the news stories, even if there isn't much news.
onenote
(42,700 posts)I don't think this is a new development.
Steelrolled
(2,022 posts)The US and Sweden has been running pretty close for quite a while, but a couple weeks ago, Sweden started to clearly pull away.
rocktivity
(44,576 posts)Last edited Sat May 9, 2020, 10:28 AM - Edit history (1)
Social distancing minus mass testing equals a suicide mission -- or should it called a genocide mission?
rocktivity
DVDGuy
(53 posts)...
Sweden has reported 3,220 deaths from the virus as of Saturday.
The country said early on that shielding those 70 and older was its top priority.
Yet 90 percent of those who had died as of April 28 were over the age of 70. Half were nursing home residents, and another quarter were receiving care at home, statistics from the Swedish Board of Health and Welfare show.
"We failed to protect our elderly. That's really serious, and a failure for society as a whole. We have to learn from this, we're not done with this pandemic yet," Health and Social Affairs Minister Lena Hallengren told Swedish Television recently.
...
https://www.france24.com/en/20200510-sweden-admits-failure-to-protect-elderly-in-care-homes
RhodeIslandOne
(5,042 posts)And basically "old people and the weak can go fuck themselves". Such amazing people.