Judge refuses to halt class-action suit accusing Trump of promoting pyramid scheme

[left-of-center2012]

Source: The Hill

A federal judge in Manhattan on Monday refused to halt a lawsuit against President Trump and his family alleging that they promoted a pyramid scheme.

Judge Lorna G. Schofield denied the Trump family’s request for a stay while they appeal an earlier ruling that allowed the lawsuit to move forward. Schofield, who was appointed to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York by President Obama, wrote in an opinion that the Trumps had failed to show a likelihood of success in the appeals court.

The class-action lawsuit was filed in 2018 by four anonymous plaintiffs alleging that Trump, his three eldest children and the family company had promoted a multilevel marketing company called American Communications Network (ACN) in exchange for millions of dollars in secret payments.

The plaintiffs alleged that Trump’s endorsement convinced them to invest hundreds of dollars to participate in ACN’s business that they never recouped.

Read more: https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/498488-judge-refuses-to-halt-class-action-suit-accusing-trump-of-promoting

---

The president’s legal team has argued that the plaintiffs lack legal ground to bring the suit because the Trump family had no control over ACN.

They sought to have the case moved to arbitration,
which would largely shield it from public view,
but Schofield denied the motion, and her decision is now being appealed.

[ArizonaLib]

1. Something tells me the SCOTUS (DreddScott.2) will identify this as merely a risky investment

If money is free speech, and outlawing restrictions on voting rights is not 'fair' to red states and 'the constitution does not guarantee the right to vote'

Also, sometimes the intent of congress matters, other times, as in the voting rights act, unanimous votes in congress are not enough justification.

[Stuart G]

2. K and R Thank You for posting..