N.Y.C. Hired 3,000 Workers for Contact Tracing. It's Off to a Slow Start.
Source: NY Times
New York Citys ambitious contact-tracing program, a crucial initiative in the effort to curb the coronavirus, has gotten off to a worrisome start just as the citys reopening enters a new phase on Monday, with outdoor dining, in-store shopping and office work resuming.
The city has hired 3,000 disease detectives and case monitors, who are supposed to identify anyone who has come into contact with the hundreds of people who are still testing positive for the virus in the city every day. But the first statistics from the program, which began on June 1, indicate that tracers are often unable to locate infected people or gather information from them.
Only 35 percent of the 5,347 city residents who tested positive or were presumed positive for the coronavirus in the programs first two weeks gave information about close contacts to tracers, the city said in releasing the first statistics. The number ticked up slightly, to 42 percent, during the third week, Avery Cohen, a spokeswoman to Mayor Bill de Blasio, said on Sunday.
Contact tracing is one of the few tools that public health officials have to fight Covid-19 in lieu of a vaccine, along with widespread testing and isolation of those exposed to the coronavirus. The early results of New Yorks program raise fresh concerns about the difficulties in preventing a surge of new cases as states across the country reopen.
Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/21/nyregion/nyc-contact-tracing.html
onecaliberal
(32,854 posts)This is why California kicked down to begin with when the bag area attempted to contact trace but it was nearly impossible.
ancianita
(36,055 posts)This isn't about doing something right. It's about balancing privacy with public health cooperation.
This is about getting the data right up front, especially in the hot zone zip codes.
People are hard to find; once found, hard to talk to; once talked with, hard to get them to tell who they contacted without the interviewee feeling they're betraying their contact's privacy. With multiple contacts for each interviewee, the tracing process is even harder.
onecaliberal
(32,854 posts)Clearly its complicated. If an infected person walks through a store of strangers, how do you track those people down? Were not hiring enough people, were not getting them trained quickly enough.. blah blah blah. We STILL dont have adequate testing let alone tracing. The plan is every man for himself.
DSandra
(999 posts)Much of America rejected government till the FDR era and then again since the Reagan revolution. We havent even been able to get together a healthcare system.
Buckeye_Democrat
(14,853 posts)I considered applying for some contact tracing jobs a few weeks ago, but then I thought about the likely headaches from uncooperative people and decided against it.
Not to mention that several of them will get infected from doing STUPID stuff like going to crowded bars, and they won't want to discuss it.
moosewhisperer
(114 posts)We need a national public service announcement campaign to tell educate people about why contact tracing is important, not only to cooperate, but to make sure they can recall contacts and their info.
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)Igel
(35,300 posts)Others had laws mandating it.
The whole "don't ask about protests" is also a bit of weirdness. Granted, it's an untraceable mess, but even then it might lead to "this particular person got it because the virus spontaneously generated."
EllieBC
(3,014 posts)Do we want correct data or feel good bullshit?
Steelrolled
(2,022 posts)I am looking forward to our return to Normal-Bizzaro world.
ancianita
(36,055 posts)And when he gives his next briefing, and gets questions about the problems, he'll discuss how those are handled, too.
Public health data is an upfront, slow slog, but a necessary one since pandemics are in the world's future.
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,340 posts)Most people will just hang up on you, and that's the "nice" response.
I would probably just hang up. I get so many calls, I'd figure "contract tracing" is just one more scam call. No way I'd name my friends to "some caller".
EllieBC
(3,014 posts)numbers we dont recognize or that come up unknown, I am not surprised people arent answering. This isnt 1982. People can ignore calls from callers they dont know.
truthisfreedom
(23,146 posts)And we're worse now. Suspicious and freaked out.