Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,597 posts)
Wed Jul 1, 2020, 06:04 AM Jul 2020

Oklahoma voters narrowly approve Medicaid expansion

Source: AP

By SEAN MURPHY

OKLAHOMA CITY (AP) — Oklahoma voters narrowly decided on Tuesday to expand Medicaid health insurance to tens of thousands low-income residents, becoming the first state to amend its Constitution to do so.

With 100% of precincts reporting unofficial results, State Question 802 passed by less than 1 percentage point. The question fared well in metropolitan areas, including Oklahoma City and Tulsa, but was overwhelmingly opposed in rural counties.

Idaho, Maine, Nebraska and Utah have all expanded Medicaid through ballot questions, but did so by amending state statutes, according to the nonpartisan Kaiser Family Foundation.

Amending the Oklahoma Constitution will prevent the Republican-controlled Legislature, which has resisted Medicaid expansion for a decade, from tinkering with the program or rolling back coverage. Missouri voters also will decide on a constitutional amendment on Aug. 4.



FILE - In this Oct. 24, 2019, file photo, supporters of Yes on 802 Oklahomans Decide Healthcare, calling for Medicaid expansion to be put on the ballot, carry boxes of petitions into the office of the Oklahoma Secretary of State in Oklahoma City. Oklahoma voters will decide Tuesday, June 30, 2020, whether to expand Medicaid to tens of thousands of low-income residents and become the first state to amend their Constitution to do so. (AP Photo/Sue Ogrocki, File)


Read more: https://apnews.com/dc52dffc2b8792e88aeec28b9569a041

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Oklahoma voters narrowly approve Medicaid expansion (Original Post) Omaha Steve Jul 2020 OP
Should be a good sign, if a red state like Oklahoma is OK with bits of Obamacare muriel_volestrangler Jul 2020 #1
Approved in OKC and Tulsa, overwhelming no in rural areas bobbieinok Jul 2020 #2
the yahoos are still strong in the remote country RussBLib Jul 2020 #10
Wouldn't you think Alliepoo Jul 2020 #3
Here you go Bigredhunk Jul 2020 #4
+1 Lulu KC Jul 2020 #5
Glad it passed, but amazed that it was so close still_one Jul 2020 #6
Those who voted against it have a moral duty to refuse services. Free up oasis Jul 2020 #7
Does anyone know the reasoning for opposing it? lettucebe Jul 2020 #8
Brainwashing by FOX, and the republicans not_the_one Jul 2020 #9
In the 21st century, we still area51 Jul 2020 #11

muriel_volestrangler

(101,308 posts)
1. Should be a good sign, if a red state like Oklahoma is OK with bits of Obamacare
Wed Jul 1, 2020, 06:28 AM
Jul 2020

then Trump's attempt to destroy it totally will be unpopular.

RussBLib

(9,006 posts)
10. the yahoos are still strong in the remote country
Wed Jul 1, 2020, 12:32 PM
Jul 2020

when you live in a city, you learn how to cooperate a little more by your frequent exposure to other people.

Alliepoo

(2,215 posts)
3. Wouldn't you think
Wed Jul 1, 2020, 07:37 AM
Jul 2020

That the folks in rural areas might be more in need of health insurance? I just don’t get why they vote against their own best interest. That their apparent hatred of Democrats and liberal programs is so strong that the rural folks would want to deny themselves and their loved ones access to better healthcare just boggles my mind. Again and again and again!

Lulu KC

(2,565 posts)
5. +1
Wed Jul 1, 2020, 10:36 AM
Jul 2020

I once heard a talk by a former state rep in Missouri, a Republican, who had been trying and trying to get his peers (who of course dominate the statehouse) to accept the ACA $ and Medicaid expansion for Missouri. This was 2012 or 2013. He gave excellent analysis about how the biggest need for the program was in rural counties, about how often the hospitals were the biggest employers in those counties, and how there was more use of other federal "welfare" programs in those counties.
Nope. Why? Association with Obama. And we all know what that means.
He finally left that role behind--a secure incumbent--because he was so frustrated by the lack of mathematical skills! I can still see him writing on a white board, hands up in the air.
It left a huge impression on me. (Not enough that I can remember his name, though! :chuckle

oasis

(49,376 posts)
7. Those who voted against it have a moral duty to refuse services. Free up
Wed Jul 1, 2020, 11:07 AM
Jul 2020

those tax dollars for "Trump's Wall". dumbshits.

lettucebe

(2,336 posts)
8. Does anyone know the reasoning for opposing it?
Wed Jul 1, 2020, 11:18 AM
Jul 2020

I have no clue why people would vote against it, so if anyone has the counter argument, I'd love to hear it.

 

not_the_one

(2,227 posts)
9. Brainwashing by FOX, and the republicans
Wed Jul 1, 2020, 11:32 AM
Jul 2020

Anything that is "liberal" (f*gs, baby killers), or is any way connected to Obama (pssst, OMG there is/was a n****r in the WHITE house), all in the name of GAWD.

But they will be first in line to take advantage of it when it IS available.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Oklahoma voters narrowly ...