Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,648 posts)
Mon Jul 13, 2020, 06:08 PM Jul 2020

Federal judge voids Georgia 'heartbeat' abortion restriction

Source: Associated Press


Jeff Amy, Associated Press
Updated 5:01 pm CDT, Monday, July 13, 2020

ATLANTA (AP) — A federal judge on Monday permanently blocked Georgia's 2019 “heartbeat" abortion law, finding that it violates the U.S. Constitution.

U.S. District Judge Steve Jones ruled against the state in a lawsuit filed by abortion providers and an advocacy group. Jones had temporarily blocked the law in October, and it never went into effect. The new ruling permanently enjoins the state from ever enforcing House Bill 481.

Georgia's measure sought to ban abortions once a “detectable human heartbeat” was present, with some limited exceptions. Cardiac activity can be detected by ultrasound as early as six weeks into a pregnancy, before many women realize they’re pregnant, according to a legal challenge. The bill narrowly passed the Georgia General Assembly amid intense lobbying for and against.

Those who challenged the lawsuit said the ruling proves their contention that the measure was unconstitutional. Lead plaintiff SisterSong, an Atlanta-based group that fights abortion restrictions on behalf of African American and other women of color, called it a “huge win for bodily autonomy.”

Read more: https://www.chron.com/news/article/Federal-judge-strikes-down-Georgia-abortion-15404989.php

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Federal judge voids Georgia 'heartbeat' abortion restriction (Original Post) Judi Lynn Jul 2020 OP
Good RhodeIslandOne Jul 2020 #1
Excellent news. iluvtennis Jul 2020 #2
Good decision! JudyM Jul 2020 #3
Excellent. One battle won in the ongoing, escalating, War Against Women. niyad Jul 2020 #4
Their goal, I am sure, is to wear us out with these kinds of laws. CTyankee Jul 2020 #7
Exactly. And many of us are still here from pre-Roe, still angry, still fighting. niyad Jul 2020 #9
The doctor should be treating the patient. LiberalFighter Jul 2020 #5
I'm sure rethuglicans are working on that Bayard Jul 2020 #6
That Sure Would Have Spoiled Birtherism! ProfessorGAC Jul 2020 #8

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
7. Their goal, I am sure, is to wear us out with these kinds of laws.
Tue Jul 14, 2020, 04:49 PM
Jul 2020

Fortunately, every time they do we get new recruits of angry women ready to fight for their rights.

LiberalFighter

(51,170 posts)
5. The doctor should be treating the patient.
Mon Jul 13, 2020, 07:43 PM
Jul 2020

The fetus is not a patient and not covered under insurance.
Pregnancy is a medical condition. Covered under insurance. The woman if she has insurance is covered. But not the fetus.

There is no other situation where a patient is forced to continue with their medical condition. If a patient has a cancer tumor they get to decide with the help of the doctor whether to have it removed or leave it alone. There is no requirement for a person with a heart attack forcing them to continue having a heart attack. There is no requirement for a man to be circumcised. All are decisions that the person decides for their own welfare.


Legislators should only legislate for citizens. Fetuses are not citizens.

ProfessorGAC

(65,248 posts)
8. That Sure Would Have Spoiled Birtherism!
Tue Jul 14, 2020, 05:08 PM
Jul 2020

Unintended consequences for them.
BHO would have been a citizen 9 months before he was born!!!

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Federal judge voids Georg...