High Court Fast Tracks Remand of New York Trump Subpoena Case

[mahatmakanejeeves]

Source: Bloomberg Law

High Court Fast Tracks Remand of New York Trump Subpoena Case
July 17, 2020, 1:16 PM

The U.S. Supreme Court put a clash over a grand jury subpoena for President Donald Trump’s financial records on a fast track, formally returning it to the appeals court level ahead of schedule.

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance had asked the justices not to wait 25-plus days, as they normally do after issuing an opinion. The court ruled on July 9, rejecting Trump’s claim of sweeping immunity while leaving open the possibility he could raise more specific objections in the the lower courts. Vance told the Supreme Court that Trump consented to the fast-track request.

The justices haven’t acted...

To read the full article log in.

Read more: https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/high-court-fast-tracks-remand-of-new-york-trump-subpoena-case

---

Hat tip, Joe.My.God.

https://www.joemygod.com/2020/07/scotus-puts-trump-financials-case-on-fast-track/

[marybourg]

1. The Supreme Court "put a clash . . ."?

I can’t even guess what they (Bloomberg) meant.

[mahatmakanejeeves]

2. There was a clash over a grand jury subpoena.

They put that clash on a fast track.

Yeah, I thought it was awful too. I hope they rewrite it.

[marybourg]

5. Thanx. I couldn't make it out at all.

[pnwmom]

3. They meant "dispute." They put a dispute between the state and the defense on a fast track

to be decided.

[marybourg]

4. Thanx. I couldn't work that out at all.

[pnwmom]

6. Yeah, I know. My brain got stuck for a moment at that word, too.nt

[marybourg]

8. I kept looking for something the court *put* on the suit.

like an order of some sort.

[Bernardo de La Paz]

7. Put a clash on a fast track. A clash over a suit about tax returns. It's poor writing. . . . nt

[docgee]

10. I thought it meant they couldn't decide

If they should stay or they should go.

[lagomorph777]

9. Very good news.