Senate Republicans, White House seek to reduce weekly unemployment benefit from $600 to $200
Last edited Mon Jul 27, 2020, 01:11 PM - Edit history (1)
Source: Washington Post
By
Erica Werner,
Jeff Stein and
Seung Min Kim
Senate Republicans will propose cutting weekly emergency unemployment benefits from $600 to $200 until states can bring a more complicated program online, according to two people familiar with the plan granted anonymity to share details that had not yet been released.
The proposal will come as part of a broader $1 trillion stimulus bill aimed at dealing with the economic fallout caused by the coronavirus. Republicans plan to release later on Monday and that they hope to use during negotiations with Democrats. The $600 weekly jobless benefit expires in a few days, and House Democrats have proposed extending it until January because the unemployment rate remains very high.
Senate Republicans want to reduce the $600 payment to $200 until states can implement a new approach that would pay workers 70 percent of the income they collected before they lost their jobs. The states are supposed to phase in the new formula within two months.
The Republican package will also propose cutting the current $600-per-week increase to $200-per-week as states implement the transition to the new wage replacement mechanism, these people said, as many state unemployment systems are expected to have difficulty implementing the more targeted program.
Read more: Link to sohttps://www.washingtonpost.com/us-policy/2020/07/27/senate-stimulus-coronavirus/
New link:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/us-policy/2020/07/27/senate-stimulus-coronavirus/
stopbush
(24,395 posts)Evolve Dammit
(16,723 posts)johnnyfins
(816 posts)They want the liability protections most of all. All of their friends in business are prolly beating down the door for that part. Looks like the added UI money will be between $300 and $400. It's like a Pawn Stars negotiation.
droidamus2
(1,699 posts)If the Democrats give them liability coverage and also reduced unemployment coverage that is going to hurt. The leadership may think that Fat Donnie is bad enough that they can get away with fully buckling in one provision and partially buckling in the other. At the very least if this is what we get and the Democrats win back the Presidency and the Senate we should push for leadership changes that puts people in power that know how to play hardball when it comes to negotiations. I am real tired of hearing the excuse of 'we tried but this was all we could get'.
forthemiddle
(1,379 posts)In the end, it is a negotiation. Until at least January (If we take the Senate), we have to deal, or we will get nothing (and vice versa).
So Speaker Pelosi can either meet them 1/2 way, or we don't get another relief package, and a whole lot of people will be hurting.
We were never going to get all $600.00, but I think $300.00 - $400.00 is better than nothing, and maybe Biden can campaign on raising it back up, if it's still needed come January 20th, 2021!
johnnyfins
(816 posts)If the extra UI money is cut drastically, or completely, there is going to be economic hardship like we haven't seen. It doesnt just affect the unemployed, either.
JCMach1
(27,555 posts)People can't wait two months.
bucolic_frolic
(43,123 posts)duforsure
(11,885 posts)Into a depression, and to starve the American people back to work while a deadly pandemic is ravaging the country. Is trump wanting a depression for profit?
Ohiogal
(31,963 posts)For two more months, or until the new state systems are in place. Whats so hard about that.
durablend
(7,459 posts)Simply cannot have that
Polybius
(15,372 posts)I'm desperate for cash, so I'll settle for $400 a week. $200 a week won't cut it.
Betty88
(717 posts)for unemployment. In NY, back in my day anyway, it was half your pay up to $420 or about that. Why not make it easy. Pay the people who are out what they made before total. Then no one can cry, oh they are making more, cause god forbid you get a few dollars extra while the world falls apart
Polybius
(15,372 posts)The link no longer works.
Response to Polybius (Reply #13)
swag This message was self-deleted by its author.
swag
(26,486 posts)Should be corrected now.
Thank you!