How Did Voters React to the Debate?
Source: ABC News (The Note blog)
When asked to describe their impressions of Romney, the women used words like rude, pushy and assertive and when asked to clarify if assertive was positive or negative, the woman who offered that description said it was negative.
...
Several women expressed disappointment that abortion rights were not brought up, saying that they would have liked to hear the candidates talk about that issue in their own words, since they mostly just hear small snippets in commercials.
Read more: http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/10/how-did-voters-react-to-the-debate/
still_one
(98,883 posts)Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)and that there would be 3 segments dedicated to the economy.
still_one
(98,883 posts)tarheelsunc
(2,117 posts)I don't think anyone could name even one of those questions now because Romney kept cutting Obama and Lehrer off to continue each question much longer than it should have gone on for.
spicegal
(758 posts)was lots of territory not covered. Romney ran out the clock with nonsense, leaving no time for other issues.
tblue
(16,350 posts)I doubt it.
Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)The debates with questions from the audience?
skeewee08
(1,983 posts)I believe Candy Crawley is the mod
gtar100
(4,192 posts)If the world wasn't so skewed by money and self-interest, he would never be in the position he's in. Bias oozes from him. But in today's America, that's what republicans pay millions of dollars for. Substandard talent is a byproduct of being a sell-out.
ailsagirl
(24,287 posts)Perhaps we're not the only ones who thought his behavior was abominable.
Indpndnt
(2,391 posts)Let Willard run loose and show his real self. I enjoyed it. He was a real ass.
ailsagirl
(24,287 posts)Not very presidential at all
Texas Lawyer
(350 posts)When Republican Mitt Romney said he would cut government funding to Public Broadcasting Service, a group of undecided and independent voters at the Dole Institute of Politics watching the first presidential debate moved their dials way down.
...
After the debate, Kansas University associate professor Mary Banwart asked the group members why they disapproved of Romney's verbal shot at PBS. "I thought that was a stupid move," Kathie Stovall of Lawrence said as others around the table nodded in agreement. Stovall said she supported PBS.
Banwart also noted that during the debate, the group seemed to grade Romney down the more aggressive he became in pointing out differences between himself and Obama, than they did when Obama did the same thing to Romney.
Elaine Grosser of Eudora, and a registered Republican, said she felt Obama did a better job of explaining himself than Romney, and she said that she did not appreciate Romney's remarks that were publicized last month about 47 percent of the population being dependent on the government and in Obama's column.
"I don't think he is in touch with us," Grosser, 68, said of Romney. Her husband, Stewart, 73, and retired from the Navy, said he was undecided about who to support. He agreed with Obama on some issues, but added, "He (Obama) seems to hit a brick wall with Congress." Later, he said he felt himself agreeing with Obama more during the debate. "I felt like Obama was giving stronger answers," he said.
http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2012/oct/03/group-dole-applies-dials-romney-obama-during-debat/
ailsagirl
(24,287 posts)Liberalynn
(7,549 posts)thanks for the booster
wordpix
(18,652 posts)Xipe Totec
(44,558 posts)From the article:
"Two things seemed to resonate Romneys history of reaching across the aisle in Massachusetts and the fact that these voters felt like they heard something new from him in terms of his plans, while Obama was telling them the same thing theyve been hearing for four years."
Not surprising since Romney's plan changes every time he tells it. It's always new, like he just finished pulling it out of his ass.
ffr
(23,398 posts)He supports plans put in place by Bill Clinton
He supports federal funding for education
He supports single payer health care reform
He supports regulations on the banking system
Heck he supports everything that anybody in the middle would want to hear.
In affect, he supports everything the current GOP platform is against.
Wonder how many of my Rep buddies will actually be crying tomorrow morning.
skeewee08
(1,983 posts)regnaD kciN
(27,639 posts)...two years into President Romney's term.
Jazzy_Obama
(23 posts)On top of being frusturated with Obama MSNBC & That stupid moderator overall I'm not feeling to good about tonight & to be quite honest I'm probably won't watch the news all day tomorrow
goodnight guys
skeewee08
(1,983 posts)The VP debate & 2 more Presidential debates
wordpix
(18,652 posts)I'm positive they will
Call me an optimist but posts like this one give me hope
Shuhered
(200 posts)Look. It was Obama and Michelle's Anniversary. They need a dinner out somewhere and snuggle time. My vote here in Iowa is already sent in as are many of my friends. Obama looked down a lot but was far too charitable with not coming after him with Romney's lies. I think that is the plan and that he will go for the kill by the third debate. There is a timely and methodical method to Obama's media.
Jazzy_Obama
(23 posts)I feel a lil better after thinking about what y'all said. I'm not giving up by a long shot I'm still preparing to fight till the end & march to the polls Oct 27(MD early vote starts) This is just a speed bump to our road to victory!
Shuhered
(200 posts)Yea life in Iowa is very much in favor of Obama. I have donated and, of course, signs are in the yard. Having mailed in my vote already, I feel confident that Obama's abilities have already won over enough swing states to guarantee a second term. But let's keep up the full court press!!!! VOTE!!! And often, heehee.
tblue37
(68,436 posts)Romney's answers.
whathehell
(30,468 posts)especially with the "split screen". At times it looked like Romney
was "lecturing" Obama. Bad optics.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)The "entitlement" appearance of Rmoney was also very negative when he was running over Lehrer's attempts to rein him in and stick with the time limit. I found Rmoney to look both entitled and just like the spoiled brat he is.
whathehell
(30,468 posts)It does look "disrespectful", but Obama, in my view, unwittingly enabled
this by constantly lowering his head. Everyone watching the debate is
not strongly pro-Obama" as we DUers. The undecideds are watching too
and they are not as likely as many of us to view it all as "Romney Bad".
My point was, this may look "bad" in a sense, for Romney, but it's JUST as
likely undecideds will view it differently, e.g. Obama looks weak.
Honest assessments are not signs of "disloyalty". The president
did not, in the view of MANY, if not most, did not have a good night last night.
He needs to step up his game for the remaining debates.
defacto7
(14,162 posts)Different view makes a huge difference. I was utterly surprised. Obama was great!
FailureToCommunicate
(14,605 posts)Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)He left ALL the meat on the table.
He could have pushed Romney into history's dustbin several times, easily, and didn't.
Kablooie
(19,107 posts)Kablooie
(19,107 posts)Ive not seen that from Obama.
Good god!
The GOP strategy is working.
OBAMA is getting the blame for not working with Republicans!
Remember when he had a special meeting with them at the beginning specifically to encourage bi-partisan discussions?
They all said he was very open and sensible, then they kicked him in the teeth.
That is a huge failing on the part of the Democrats.
They didn't get the truth out that the Republican are the whole problem, not Obama.
Too late now to do anything about it now unless Obama can make a convincing case in the next debate.
skeewee08
(1,983 posts)President O will
Rustycup
(41 posts)to say no and defeat Romney. This is the problem with Dems they do work across the aisle...Once Romney gets in they will work with him also.....it is a huge failure on their part. They don't get create and need to let people know they work with others the republicans don't. But MSM will spin it they are whining. They also need to start promoting government. My concern was when Obama said he and Romney agree on SS. WTF? Ryan wants to privatize it and means test it. The Dems are going to lose big if they don't get on saving SS. Do they not believe that? Then why vote for them. At least I know where Ryan stands.
Crap people are losing pensions, the stock market is not keeping up with 401K...when need all three pillars. Ugh! .
ailsagirl
(24,287 posts)Obama 'didn't reach across the aisle' nor be bipartisan!!!
That's got to be the toppling outrage!!
Obama has ALWAYS striven to be bipartisan and to work together as Americans, not Dems/repukes/independents, etc.
Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)I realize that this strategy made the Republicans look like the obstructionists that they are, but it was maddening.
defacto7
(14,162 posts)Please watch it again on c-span if you have any doubt at all. The view is different than the original and it is quite a surprise....
www.c-span.org/Debates/
skeewee08
(1,983 posts)progree
(12,976 posts)DallasNE
(8,008 posts)They will be coming. You can count on it. Except for his Tenther comments there wasn't much in it for Romney's base. And when will somebody apply math to Romney's proposals and report on it? Why is MSM giving Romney a free ride on this when it is the core issue of the campaign.
maddogesq
(1,248 posts)Blueprogress
(64 posts)I have been not too enthusiastic this election cycle. I have been disappointed with some of the actions of the President especially when it comes on to dealing with congress and the concessions he made. I had just recently updated my voter registration card and up until last night did not make a donation this election cycle. However, after watching the debates last night I am fired up again. I cannot believe people are saying Mitt Romney won. Although I agree Pres. Obama could have tried harder to swim out of the murky mess that was Mitt Romney last night; Mitt proved to me that he is nothing more than a rich 1%, who feels so entitled, does not follow rules and does not believe he has to prove anything to the voters that he wants to elect him. He also clearly does not believe in facts. He had many promises but few specifics. To me the president looked very presidential in that the midst of a fire storm he has a level head. However, pants of fire Mitt seems as if he was about to pounce on the "moderator", the Pres. or anyone who challenged him last night. He is not calm and collected enough to be the President. I think Mitt's performance was that of a school yard bully and he should not be rewarded for that. He was extremely rude and in a frightening way showed he is not steady. If Pres. Obama performed anywhere close to what Mitt did last night the media would be using the angry thug who breaks all rules message. Yes, Obama was not on his A game but nobody should act like Mitt did last night. In my opinion it was a terrible performance. I cannot wait to vote against this rude repugnant Rmoney.
Another issue I have with what I have been hearing is that the President was looking down too much- I must have been watching a different the debate, because the President was the only one who constantly looked directly at the camera and address the viewing audience. I wish here in Florida, we started early voting already, cant wait to vote for Obama.
Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)GOTV in Florida, do whatever you can, and we can change things together.
Overseas
(12,121 posts)question again and again.
He should have known R would lie all the way and should have moved through a range of domestic policy questions.
LibertyLover
(4,788 posts)He was way too deferrential to Romney and let him get away with way too much crap.