The C.D.C. director, facing criticism, now says testing 'may be considered' for anyone exposed
Source: New York Times
The director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has scaled back the agencys recommendation advising some people not to get tested after exposure to the novel coronavirus, now saying testing may be considered for all close contacts of confirmed or probable Covid-19 patients.
The statement by Dr. Robert R. Redfield was issued to some news outlets late Wednesday, and more broadly Thursday morning, after a storm of criticism over the new C.D.C. guidelines involving potentially asymptomatic people which were the product of the White House Coronavirus task force and not the C.D.C.s own scientists. Dr. Redfield made the statement in an effort to clarify the new policy, an official said. However, the guidelines issued earlier this week remained on the C.D.C.s website as of Thursday morning, and it appears unlikely that the agency will change them.
Testing is meant to drive actions and achieve specific public health objectives, Dr. Redfield wrote. Everyone who needs a Covid-19 test, can get a test. Everyone who wants a test does not necessarily need a test; the key is to engage the needed public health community in the decision with the appropriate follow-up action.
The clarification is unusual. Public health experts say clear, consistent communications are essential to fighting an infectious disease outbreak, and Dr. Redfields comments may further confuse things.
Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/27/world/covid-19-coronavirus.html?action=click&module=Well&pgtype=Homepage§ion=World%20News
hellno45
(67 posts)dawg day
(7,947 posts)No symptoms, no known exposure. But I work with elderly people, and I wanted to be sure than I wasn't putting them at risk. I do not want to be told that my elderly clients aren't worth a test.
The more people who are tested, the more we learn about the epidemic. Like we know now -- just a small piece of data-- that my sticking close to home and always wearing a mask not at home, and not going to Trump rallies!- has worked so far.
And Trump should WANT more tests! The more non-infected people are tested negative, the less horribly horrific 6,015,317 cases seems. "Yes, but there are 80million NON-cases!"
I didn't even realize we've gone over 6 million cases. 183,959 deaths.
Bolsonaro's Brazil is working very very very hard to catch up to us.
IllinoisBirdWatcher
(2,315 posts)lapucelle
(18,252 posts)ForgoTheConsequence
(4,868 posts)The NIH, the Surgeon General, the CDC, these are not institutions that should be politicized. They should be a bedrock of the American government no matter what party is in power. If we destroy faith in these non-partisan institutions and science in general we are beyond fucked. Sadly,. I think we're already there.
chriscan64
(1,789 posts)We have (had?) a whole myriad of non-partisan, apolitical agencies full of career staffers, public health, diplomacy etc. Elected officials installed heads of these agencies and departments but all respected the work they did and took the advice given. It only took one psychopath to reveal how tenuous the whole system was.
BumRushDaShow
(128,958 posts)and our Health Director literally just said 5 minutes ago that we are NOT changing our recommendations for testing here, regardless of what the CDC said (and we know that was political b.s.).
matt819
(10,749 posts)Resign.
procon
(15,805 posts)They already threw science out the window when they started nodding in agreement like a bobble head doll to all of Trump's crazy ideas. Now they want to do a 180 and pretend like they are doing independent work again. Beside Fauci, Why would anyone believe anyone from the CDC?