10th Trump judicial nominee so inexperienced she got rated 'not qualified'

[turbinetree]

Source: American Independent



By Emily Singer -September 9, 2020 12:34 PM

The American Bar Association said Kathryn Mizelle has never tried a case and does not have the necessary experience to be a judge.

The American Bar Association on Wednesday rated one of Donald Trump's nominees to a federal district court in Florida as "not qualified" — the 10th Trump judicial nominee to earn that stamp of disapproval.

In a letter to Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and Ranking Member Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), the ABA said Kathryn Kimball Mizelle does not have the experience to serve as a judge for the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, which Trump nominated her to.

Mizelle has been a practicing lawyer for a little less than eight years, far short of the 12-year minimum experience the ABA says a judicial nominee should have. Mizelle has also never tried a case, which the ABA said led a "substantial majority" of its Standing Committee members — which vote on whether a president's judicial nominees are qualified to serve on the federal bench — to determine Mizelle is not qualified to serve.

"Ms. Mizelle has a very keen intellect, a strong work ethic and an impressive resume. She presents as a delightful person and she has many friends who support her nomination. Her integrity and demeanor are not in question. These attributes however simply do not compensate for the short time she has actually practiced law and her lack of meaningful trial experience," Randall Noel, the chair of the ABA's Standing Committee, wrote in the letter to Graham and Feinstein.

Published with permission of The American Independent Foundation.

Read more: https://americanindependent.com/10th-trump-judicial-nominee-kathryn-mizelle-american-bar-association-no-experience/

---

Lets put this article in another context................Federalist Society.........

This individual doesn't even meet the minimum requirements..................


November 3, 2020 cannot get here fast enough,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

[CurtEastPoint]

1. Yeah, but she went to Covenant College (In all things Christ preeminent) and has nice hair.

AND... her husband CHAD (no shit) "has less than 10 years' experience as an attorney and will now run the DHS Office of the General Counsel, which oversees 2,500 attorneys and is ultimately responsible for all of the department's legal determinations.

[turbinetree]

3. This is BS...............he shouldn't even be in that position this smells like quid quo pro BS

I am about to spit nails.....................

[CurtEastPoint]

5. He and egghead Miller are buddies. natch.

[turbinetree]

7. Oh great another close racist buddy...................

[BKDem]

2. Boof Boy Kavenaugh didn't make the Federalist original list.

Somebody had to add him, I forget who.

[KS Toronado]

4. Believe John McGann (Sp?) his first chief of staff.

Not for sure if I spelled his name correctly.

[BKDem]

8. Yep. That's the guy.

Don McGahn, WH lawyer.

[turbinetree]

6. The one and only .................

Leonard Leo, executive vice president of the Federalist Society and a close adviser to the White House on judicial appointments.

[BKDem]

9. He's the major bad guy on judges.

But I think McGahn intervened for Kavenaugh. ( I could be wrong, of course.)

[turbinetree]

11. Yepper spot on................

another Federalist Society................ass..............


https://www.usnews.com/news/politics/articles/2019-12-24/battle-over-mcgahn-testimony-heightens-trump-impeachment-drama

[StClone]

10. Face it, they are not Judges they are all hacks who need to be removed

[JustABozoOnThisBus]

14. I think they are all hacks who cannot be removed.

What's that saying, "Elections have consequences"?

And approval of judges and justices no longer needs 60 senators.

[benld74]

12. When he's found guilty of all WE know he's guilty of

ALL judges nominated & seated need to be removed immediately.

[Mr.Bill]

13. There is a procedure for removing Judges.

It's the same as removing the President. We need 67 votes in the senate. Maybe by 2024.

[jaxexpat]

16. The golden fleece, the holy grail.

Or some timely judicial retirements.................

Not really too concerned with procedure at this point.

Say the lines, then we'll write the script around the dialogue. But SAY THE LINES.

[Polybius]

21. We're never getting 67 Senators

The country is too divided for one Party to be in such a supermassive majority again.

[FBaggins]

15. And how does that happen? nt

[Polybius]

20. It'll never happen in a million years

We're stuck with them until they retire.

[keithbvadu2]

17. She has all the experience/qualifications Trump wants - loyalty to him over country.

She has all the experience/qualifications Trump wants - loyalty to him over country.

[NCjack]

18. and, she has watched a-hell-ava-lot of conservative judge shows on TV.

[Polybius]

19. It won't matter

She'll be confirmed, and at 33 we can expect her on the bench for the next 50 years.